Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering ‘nature-positive’ outcomes? A review of ‘nature-positive’ definitions, company progress and challenges by zu Ermgassen, SOSE, Howard, M, Bennun, L, Addison, PFE, Bull, JW, Loveridge, R, Pollard, E, Starkey, M

Global no net loss of natural ecosystems by Maron, M, Simmonds, J, Watson, J, Sonter, L, Bennun, L, Griffiths, VF, Quétier, F, Von Hase, A, Edwards, S, Rainey, H, Bull, J, Savy, C, Victurine, R, Kiesecker, J, Puydarrieux, P, Stevens, T, Cozannet, N, Jones, J

Moving from biodiversity offsets to a target-based approach for ecological compensation by Simmonds, J, Sonter, L, Watson, J, Bennun, L, Costa, H, Dutson, G, Edwards, S, Grantham, H, Griffiths, V, Jones, J, Kiesecker, J, Possingham, H, Puydarrieux, P, Quetier, F, Rainer, H, Rainey, H, Roe, D, Savy, C, Souquet, M, Ten Kate, K, Victurine, R, Von Hase, A, Maron, M

Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals by Sonter, LJ, Simmonds, JS, Watson, JEM, Jones, JPG, Kiesecker, JM, Costa, HM, Bennun, L, Edwards, S, Grantham, HS, Griffiths, VF, Jones, K, Sochi, K, Puydarrieux, P, Quétier, F, Rainer, H, Rainey, H, Roe, D, Satar, M, Soares-Filho, BS, Starkey, M, ten Kate, K, Victurine, R, von Hase, A, Wells, JA, Maron, M