Comparison of randomized controlled trials discontinued or revised for poor recruitment and completed trials with the same research question: a matched qualitative study by Briel, M, Speich, B, Von Elm, E, Gloy, V

Problems of stopping trials early. by Guyatt, G, Briel, M, Glasziou, P, Bassler, D, Montori, V

Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematic. by Bassler, D, Montori, V, Briel, M, Glasziou, P, Guyatt, G

Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: is there a problem and if so, what is it? by Bassler, D, Montori, V, Briel, M, Glasziou, P, Walter, S, Ramsay, T, Guyatt, G

A scoping review shows that several nonvalidated budget planning tools for randomized trials are available by Speich, B, Gloy, V, Schur, N, Ewald, H, Hemkens, L, Schwenkglenks, M, Briel, M

A meta-research study revealed several challenges in obtaining placebos for investigator-initiated drug trials by Speich, B, Logullo, P, Deuster, S, Marian, IR, Moschandreas, J, Herav, AT, Gloy, V, Briel, M, Hopewell, S

What proportion of ethically approved randomised clinical trials can be found in a trial registry? by Speich, B, Gryaznov, D, Gloy, V, McCord, K, Agarwal, A, Kasenda, B, Briel, M

Reporting quality of journal abstracts for surgical randomized controlled trials before and after the implementation of the CONSORT extension for abstracts by Speich, B, Cord, KA, Agarwal, A, Gloy, V, Gryaznov, D, Moffa, G, Hopewell, S, Briel, M

Current use and costs of electronic health records for clinical trial research: a descriptive study by Mc Cord, K, Hannah, E, Ladanie, A, Briel, M, Speich, B, Bucher, H, Hemkens, L

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for... by Speich, B, Schroter, S, Briel, M, Moher, D, Puebla, I, Clark, A, Schlussel, MM, Ravaud, P, Boutron, I, Hopewell, S

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus. by Bassler, D, Mueller, K, Briel, M, Kleijnen, J, Marusic, A, Wager, E, Antes, G, von Elm, E, Altman, D, Meerpohl, J

A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: the Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study by Speich, B, Odutayo, A, Peckham, N, Ooms, A, Stokes, JR, Saccilotto, R, Gryaznov, D, von Niederhäusern, B, Copsey, B, Altman, DG, Briel, M, Hopewell, S

Design, analysis and reporting of multi-arm trials and strategies to address multiple testing by Odutayo, A, Gryaznov, D, Copsey, B, Monk, P, Speich, B, Roberts, C, Vadher, K, Dutton, P, Briel, M, Hopewell, S, Altman, D, ASPIRE Study Group

Systematic review on costs and resource use of randomized clinical trials shows a lack of transparent and comprehensive data by Speich, B, Von Niederhäusern, B, Schur, N, Hemkens, L, Fürst, T, Bhatnagar, N, Alturki, R, Agarwal, A, Kasenda, B, Pauli-Magnus, C, Schwenkglenks, M, Briel, M

Retrospective assessment of resource use and costs in two investigator-initiated randomized trials exemplified a comprehensive cost item list by Speich, B, Von Niederhäusern, B, Blum, CA, Keiser, J, Schur, N, Fürst, T, Kasenda, B, Christ-Crain, M, Hemkens, LG, Pauli-Magnus, C, Schwenkglenks, M, Briel, M

Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity. by Elamin, M, Flynn, D, Bassler, D, Briel, M, Alonso-Coello, P, Karanicolas, P, Guyatt, G, Malaga, G, Furukawa, T, Kunz, R, Schünemann, H, Murad, M, Barbui, C, Cipriani, A, Montori, V

Reminding peer reviewers of reporting guideline items to improve completeness in published articles: primary results of 2 randomized trials by Speich, B, Mann, E, Schönenberger, CM, Mellor, K, Griessbach, AN, Dhiman, P, Gandhi, P, Lohner, S, Agarwal, A, Odutayo, A, Puebla, I, Clark, A, Chan, A-W, Schlussel, MM, Ravaud, P, Moher, D, Briel, M, Boutron, I, Schroter, S, Hopewell, S

Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis. by Bala, M, Akl, E, Sun, X, Bassler, D, Mertz, D, Mejza, F, Vandvik, P, Malaga, G, Johnston, B, Dahm, P, Alonso-Coello, P, Diaz-Granados, N, Srinathan, S, Hassouneh, B, Briel, M, Busse, J, You, J, Walter, S, Altman, D, Guyatt, G

Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review by Akl, EA, Briel, M, You, JJ, Sun, X, Johnston, BC, Busse, JW, Mulla, S, Lamontagne, F, Bassler, D, Vera, C, Alshurafa, M, Katsios, CM, Zhou, Q, Cukierman-Yaffe, T, Gangji, A, Mills, EJ, Walter, SD, Cook, DJ, Schünemann, HJ, Altman, DG, Guyatt, GH

The impact of 18F-FDG PET on the management of patients with suspected large vessel vasculitis. by Fuchs, M, Briel, M, Daikeler, T, Walker, U, Rasch, H, Berg, S, Ng, Q, Raatz, H, Jayne, D, Kötter, I, Blockmans, D, Cid, M, Prieto-González, S, Lamprecht, P, Salvarani, C, Karageorgaki, Z, Watts, R, Luqmani, R, Müller-Brand, J, Tyndall, A, Walter, M