Application of the IDEAL framework to robotic urologic surgery. by Dahm, P, Sedrakyan, A, McCulloch, P

Opioid rotation in patients initiated on oxycodone or morphine: a register study by Ericson L, Ambring A, Björholt I, Dahm P

Get full text

Evidence-based urology in practice: heterogeneity in a systematic review meta-analysis by Imamura, M, Cook, J, MacLennan, S, N’Dow, J, Dahm, P

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles by Skoetz, N, Goldkuhle, M, van Dalen, EC, Akl, EA, Trivella, M, Mustafa, RA, Nowak, A, Dahm, P, Schünemann, H, Bender, R, GRADE Working Group

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. by Guyatt, G, Oxman, A, Akl, E, Kunz, R, Vist, G, Brozek, J, Norris, S, Falck-Ytter, Y, Glasziou, P, DeBeer, H, Jaeschke, R, Rind, D, Meerpohl, J, Dahm, P, Schünemann, H

No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations by Hirst, A, Philippou, Y, Blazeby, J, Campbell, B, Campbell, M, Feinberg, J, Rovers, M, Blencowe, N, Pennel, C, Quinn, T, Rogers, W, Cook, J, Kolias, A, Agha, R, Dahm, P, Sedrakyan, A, McCulloch, P

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. by Guyatt, G, Oxman, A, Kunz, R, Woodcock, J, Brozek, J, Helfand, M, Alonso-Coello, P, Glasziou, P, Jaeschke, R, Akl, E, Norris, S, Vist, G, Dahm, P, Shukla, V, Higgins, J, Falck-Ytter, Y, Schünemann, H

Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis. by Bala, M, Akl, E, Sun, X, Bassler, D, Mertz, D, Mejza, F, Vandvik, P, Malaga, G, Johnston, B, Dahm, P, Alonso-Coello, P, Diaz-Granados, N, Srinathan, S, Hassouneh, B, Briel, M, Busse, J, You, J, Walter, S, Altman, D, Guyatt, G

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. by Guyatt, G, Oxman, A, Sultan, S, Glasziou, P, Akl, E, Alonso-Coello, P, Atkins, D, Kunz, R, Brozek, J, Montori, V, Jaeschke, R, Rind, D, Dahm, P, Meerpohl, J, Vist, G, Berliner, E, Norris, S, Falck-Ytter, Y, Murad, M, Schünemann, H

Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized t... by Sun, X, Briel, M, Busse, J, Akl, E, You, J, Mejza, F, Bala, M, Diaz-Granados, N, Bassler, D, Mertz, D, Srinathan, S, Vandvik, P, Malaga, G, Alshurafa, M, Dahm, P, Alonso-Coello, P, Heels-Ansdell, D, Bhatnagar, N, Johnston, B, Wang, L, Walter, S, Altman, D, Guyatt, G

Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review by Sun, X, Briel, M, Busse, JW, You, JJ, Akl, EA, Mejza, F, Bala, MM, Bassler, D, Mertz, D, Diaz-Granados, N, Vandvik, PO, Malaga, G, Srinathan, SK, Dahm, P, Johnston, BC, Alonso-Coello, P, Hassouneh, B, Walter, SD, Heels-Ansdell, D, Bhatnagar, N, Altman, DG, Guyatt, GH

Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): A study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized t... by Sun, X, Briel, M, Busse, J, Akl, E, You, J, Mejza, F, Bala, M, Diaz-Granados, N, Bassler, D, Mertz, D, Srinathan, S, Vandvik, P, Malaga, G, Alshurafa, M, Dahm, P, Alonso-Coello, P, Heels-Ansdell, D, Bhatnagar, N, Johnston, B, Wang, L, Walter, S, Altman, D, Guyatt, G