Readers as research detectives by Gøtzsche Peter C

Get full text

Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it by Gøtzsche Peter C

Get full text

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies by Gøtzsche Peter C, Lundh Andreas

Get full text

Sponsors’ participation in conduct and reporting of industry trials: a descriptive study by Lundh Andreas, Krogsbøll Lasse T, Gøtzsche Peter C

Get full text

Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study by Gøtzsche Peter C, Klahn Anders, Jørgensen Karsten

Get full text

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention by Gøtzsche Peter C, Hróbjartsson Asbjørn, Krogsbøll Lasse

Get full text

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study by Gøtzsche Peter C, Moustgaard Rasmus, Schroll Jeppe B

Get full text

Flaws in design, analysis and interpretation of Pfizer's antifungal trials of voriconazole and uncritical subsequent quotations by Jørgensen Karsten J, Johansen Helle, Gøtzsche Peter C

Get full text

Fungal infection-related mortality versus total mortality as an outcome in trials of antifungal agents by Gøtzsche Peter C, Johansen Helle K, Due Anne K

Get full text

Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study by Gøtzsche Peter C, Zahl Per-Henrik, Jørgensen Karsten J

Get full text

Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: Differences in methodological quality and conclusions by Faurschou Annesofie, Tendal Britta, Maric Katja L, Jørgensen Anders W, Gøtzsche Peter C

Get full text