Résultat(s) 1 - 20 résultats de 33 pour la requête 'Oxman, A', Temps de recherche: 0,04s
Affiner les résultats
-
1
-
2
What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? par Oxman, A, Glasziou, P, Williams, J
Publié 2008Journal article -
3
What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? par Oxman, A, Glasziou, P, Williams, J
Publié 2009Journal article -
4
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. par Starr, M, Chalmers, I, Clarke, M, Oxman, A
Publié 2009Journal article -
5
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. par Hopewell, S, Loudon, K, Clarke, M, Oxman, A, Dickersin, K
Publié 2009Journal article -
6
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement par Zwarentein, M, Treweek, S, Gagnier, J, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Haynes, B, Oxman, A, Moher, D
Publié 2009Journal article -
7
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. par Zwarenstein, M, Treweek, S, Gagnier, J, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Haynes, B, Oxman, A, Moher, D
Publié 2008Journal article -
8
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. par Zwarenstein, M, Treweek, S, Gagnier, J, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Haynes, B, Oxman, A, Moher, D
Publié 2008Journal article -
9
Critical thinking in healthcare and education. par Sharples, J, Oxman, A, Mahtani, K, Chalmers, I, Oliver, S, Collins, K, Austvoll-Dahlgren, A, Hoffmann, T
Publié 2017Journal article -
10
GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. par Schünemann, H, Oxman, A, Brozek, J, Glasziou, P, Bossuyt, P, Chang, S, Muti, P, Jaeschke, R, Guyatt, G
Publié 2008Journal article -
11
GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. par Schünemann, H, Oxman, A, Brozek, J, Glasziou, P, Bossuyt, P, Chang, S, Muti, P, Jaeschke, R, Guyatt, G
Publié 2008Journal article -
12
-
13
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. par Higgins, J, Altman, D, Gøtzsche, P, Jüni, P, Moher, D, Oxman, A, Savovic, J, Schulz, K, Weeks, L, Sterne, J
Publié 2011Journal article -
14
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. par Thorpe, K, Zwarenstein, M, Oxman, A, Treweek, S, Furberg, C, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Bergel, E, Harvey, I, Magid, D, Chalkidou, K
Publié 2009Journal article -
15
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers par Thorpe, K, Zwarenstein, M, Oxman, A, Treweek, S, Furberg, C, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Bergel, E, Harvey, I, Magid, D, Chalkidou, K
Publié 2009Journal article -
16
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials par Higgins, J, Altman, D, Gøtzsche, P, Jüni, P, Moher, D, Oxman, A, Savović, J, Schulz, K, Weeks, L, Sterne, J
Publié 2011Journal article -
17
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. par Thorpe, K, Zwarenstein, M, Oxman, A, Treweek, S, Furberg, C, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Bergel, E, Harvey, I, Magid, D, Chalkidou, K
Publié 2009Journal article -
18
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. par Guyatt, G, Oxman, A, Kunz, R, Atkins, D, Brozek, J, Vist, G, Alderson, P, Glasziou, P, Falck-Ytter, Y, Schünemann, H
Publié 2011Journal article -
19
-
20
GRADE: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies par Schünemann, H, Oxman, A, Brozek, J, Glasziou, P, Jaeschke, R, Vist, G, Williams, J, Kunz, R, Craig, J, Montori, V, Bossuyt, P, Guyatt, G
Publié 2008Journal article