Equitable participation in biobanks: The risks and benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" approach by Prictor, M, Teare, H, Kaye, J

Perceptions of legislation relating to the sharing of genomic biobank results with donors-a survey of BBMRI-ERIC biobanks by Brunfeldt, M, Teare, H, Soini, S, Kääriäinen, H

Wider research applications of dynamic consent by Schuler Scott, A, Goldsmith, M, Teare, H

Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants by Teare, H, Morrison, M, Whitley, E, Kaye, J

Synthesis and reactivity of [18F]-N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide by Teare, H, Robins, E, Årstad, E, Luthra, S, Gouverneur, V

Synthesis and reactivity of [18F]-N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide. by Teare, H, Robins, E, Arstad, E, Luthra, S, Gouverneur, V

A convergent approach for the synthesis of fluorinated sphingosine analogues by Teare, H, Huguet, F, Tredwell, M, Thibaudeau, S, Luthra, S, Gouverneur, V

Why we trust dynamic consent to deliver on privacy by Schuler Scott, A, Goldsmith, M, Teare, H, Webb, H, Creese, S

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. by Kaye, J, Whitley, E, Lund, D, Morrison, M, Teare, H, Melham, K

Using an electronic device in the waiting room for patient engagement with a musculoskeletal patient registry: a mixed methods study by Coathup, V, Finlay, T, Teare, H, Kaye, J, South, M, Watt, F, Luqmani, R

Using digital technologies to engage with medical research: views of myotonic dystrophy patients in Japan by Coathup, V, Teare, H, Minari, J, Yoshizawa, G, Kaye, J, Takahashi, M, Kato, K

Radiosynthesis and evaluation of [18F]Selectfluor bis(triflate). by Teare, H, Robins, E, Kirjavainen, A, Forsback, S, Sandford, G, Solin, O, Luthra, S, Gouverneur, V

The RUDY Study: Using digital technologies to enable a research partnership by Teare, H, Hogg, J, Kaye, J, Luqmani, R, Rush, E, Turner, A, Watts, L, Williams, M, Javaid, M

Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives by Woolley, J, McGowan, M, Teare, H, Coathup, V, Fishman, J, Settersten, R, Sterckx, S, Kaye, J, Juengst, E

Motivations for data sharing—views of research participants from four European countries: A DIRECT study by Shah, N, Coathup, V, Teare, H, Forgie, I, Giordano, G, Hansen, T, Groeneveld, L, Hudson, M, Pearson, E, Ruetten, H, Kaye, J

Sharing data for future research-engaging participants' views about data governance beyond the original project: a DIRECT study by Shah, N, Coathup, V, Teare, H, Forgie, I, Giordano, G, Hansen, T, Groeneveld, L, Hudson, M, Pearson, E, Ruetten, H, Kaye, J

Health-related quality of life and a cost-utility simulation of adults in the UK with osteogenesis imperfecta, X-linked hypophosphatemia and fibrous dysplasia by Forestier-Zhang, L, Watts, L, Turner, A, Teare, H, Kaye, J, Barrett, J, Cooper, C, Eastell, R, Wordsworth, P, Javaid, M, Pinedo-Villanueva, R

The RUDY study: a novel approach to patient driven research in rare musculoskeletal diseases by Watts, L, Zhang, L, Turner, A, Teare, H, Gray, D, Gray, N, Popert, R, Hogg, J, Barrett, J, Luqmani, R, Wordsworth, P, Kaye, J, Javaid, M

The governance structure for data access in the DIRECT consortium: an innovative medicines initiative (IMI) project by Teare, H, De Masi, F, Banasik, K, Barnett, A, Herrgard, S, Jablonka, B, Postma, J, McDonald, T, Forgie, I, Chmura, P, Rydzka, E, Gupta, R, Brunak, S, Pearson, E, Kaye, J

Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research by Budin-Ljøsne, I, Teare, H, Kaye, J, Beck, S, Bentzen, H, Caenazzo, L, Collett, C, D'Abramo, F, Felzmann, H, Finlay, T, Javaid, M, Jones, E, Katić, V, Simpson, A, Mascalzoni, D