Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology

This study had compared raw biomass and pre-treated biomass co-gasified with coal with the aim of investigating the reliability of pre-treated biomass for enhancing gasification performance. Sawdust (SD) and wood pellet (palletisation form of sawdust - WP) and blends of these two feedstocks with sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatin Zafirah, Mansur, C. K. M., Faizal, Monir, Minhaj Uddin, Nur Asma Fazli, Abdul Samad, Atnaw, Samson M., Shaharin Anwar, Sulaiman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/28382/1/Co-gasification%20between%20coal.sawdust%20and%20coal1.pdf
_version_ 1796994067061538816
author Fatin Zafirah, Mansur
C. K. M., Faizal
Monir, Minhaj Uddin
Nur Asma Fazli, Abdul Samad
Atnaw, Samson M.
Shaharin Anwar, Sulaiman
author_facet Fatin Zafirah, Mansur
C. K. M., Faizal
Monir, Minhaj Uddin
Nur Asma Fazli, Abdul Samad
Atnaw, Samson M.
Shaharin Anwar, Sulaiman
author_sort Fatin Zafirah, Mansur
collection UMP
description This study had compared raw biomass and pre-treated biomass co-gasified with coal with the aim of investigating the reliability of pre-treated biomass for enhancing gasification performance. Sawdust (SD) and wood pellet (palletisation form of sawdust - WP) and blends of these two feedstocks with sub-bituminous coal (CL), were gasified in an air atmosphere using an external heated fixed-bed downdraft gasifier system. Response surface methodology (RSM) incorporating the central composite design (CCD) was applied to assist the comparison of all operating variables. The three independent variables were investigated within a specific range of coal blending ratios from 25% to 75%, gasification temperature from 650 °C to 850 °C and equivalence ratio from 0.20 to 0.30 against the dependent variables, namely the H2/CO ratio and higher heating value of the syngas (HHVsyngas). The results revealed the H2/CO ratio and a higher heating value of the syngas of more than 1.585 and 6.072 MJ/Nm3, respectively. Findings also showed that the H2/CO ratio in the syngas from CL/WP possessed a higher value than the CL/SD. In contrast, CL/SD possessed a higher heating value for syngas with about 1% difference compared to the CL/WP. Therefore, co-gasified coal with wood pellets could potentially be a substitute for sawdust.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T12:42:34Z
format Article
id UMPir28382
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T12:42:34Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling UMPir283822020-06-04T00:08:12Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/28382/ Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology Fatin Zafirah, Mansur C. K. M., Faizal Monir, Minhaj Uddin Nur Asma Fazli, Abdul Samad Atnaw, Samson M. Shaharin Anwar, Sulaiman T Technology (General) This study had compared raw biomass and pre-treated biomass co-gasified with coal with the aim of investigating the reliability of pre-treated biomass for enhancing gasification performance. Sawdust (SD) and wood pellet (palletisation form of sawdust - WP) and blends of these two feedstocks with sub-bituminous coal (CL), were gasified in an air atmosphere using an external heated fixed-bed downdraft gasifier system. Response surface methodology (RSM) incorporating the central composite design (CCD) was applied to assist the comparison of all operating variables. The three independent variables were investigated within a specific range of coal blending ratios from 25% to 75%, gasification temperature from 650 °C to 850 °C and equivalence ratio from 0.20 to 0.30 against the dependent variables, namely the H2/CO ratio and higher heating value of the syngas (HHVsyngas). The results revealed the H2/CO ratio and a higher heating value of the syngas of more than 1.585 and 6.072 MJ/Nm3, respectively. Findings also showed that the H2/CO ratio in the syngas from CL/WP possessed a higher value than the CL/SD. In contrast, CL/SD possessed a higher heating value for syngas with about 1% difference compared to the CL/WP. Therefore, co-gasified coal with wood pellets could potentially be a substitute for sawdust. Elsevier 2020 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/28382/1/Co-gasification%20between%20coal.sawdust%20and%20coal1.pdf Fatin Zafirah, Mansur and C. K. M., Faizal and Monir, Minhaj Uddin and Nur Asma Fazli, Abdul Samad and Atnaw, Samson M. and Shaharin Anwar, Sulaiman (2020) Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45 (32). pp. 15963-15976. ISSN 0360-3199. (Published) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.029
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Fatin Zafirah, Mansur
C. K. M., Faizal
Monir, Minhaj Uddin
Nur Asma Fazli, Abdul Samad
Atnaw, Samson M.
Shaharin Anwar, Sulaiman
Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology
title Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology
title_full Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology
title_fullStr Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology
title_full_unstemmed Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology
title_short Co-gasification between coal/sawdust and coal/wood pellet: A parametric study using response surface methodology
title_sort co gasification between coal sawdust and coal wood pellet a parametric study using response surface methodology
topic T Technology (General)
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/28382/1/Co-gasification%20between%20coal.sawdust%20and%20coal1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fatinzafirahmansur cogasificationbetweencoalsawdustandcoalwoodpelletaparametricstudyusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT ckmfaizal cogasificationbetweencoalsawdustandcoalwoodpelletaparametricstudyusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT monirminhajuddin cogasificationbetweencoalsawdustandcoalwoodpelletaparametricstudyusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT nurasmafazliabdulsamad cogasificationbetweencoalsawdustandcoalwoodpelletaparametricstudyusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT atnawsamsonm cogasificationbetweencoalsawdustandcoalwoodpelletaparametricstudyusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT shaharinanwarsulaiman cogasificationbetweencoalsawdustandcoalwoodpelletaparametricstudyusingresponsesurfacemethodology