Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints
Experimental analysis is often viewed as an important source of reference compared to finite element due to the accuracy of giving reliable data. Currently, finite element analysis is widely used as an early adoption in development, hence trusting the finite element data is crucial for the user. Fin...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29854/1/Model%20updating%20of%20frame%20structure%20with%20bolted%20joints.pdf |
| _version_ | 1796994322557566976 |
|---|---|
| author | M. H. N., Izham M. S. M., Sani |
| author_facet | M. H. N., Izham M. S. M., Sani |
| author_sort | M. H. N., Izham |
| collection | UMP |
| description | Experimental analysis is often viewed as an important source of reference compared to finite element due to the accuracy of giving reliable data. Currently, finite element analysis is widely used as an early adoption in development, hence trusting the finite element data is crucial for the user. Finite element analysis often shows discrepancies to the test result. The complexity of the joints (bolted) might cause the discrepancies to occur. This study aims to reduce the discrepancies between the experimental and numerical analysis on a frame structure with bolted joints by model updating. Model updating is a process of making adjustment to certain parameters of finite element model to reduce discrepancy between analytical predictions of finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental results. Modal properties (natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratio) of a frame structure with bolted joints are determined using both experimental modal analysis (EMA) and finite element analysis (FEA). Both data obtained is correlated before optimising the properties with sensitivity analysis. Joint strategy of this paper is focusing on RBE2, CBAR and CELAS element. CELAS was selected to represent the bolted modelling due to its lowest percentage average of 2.03% compares to CBAR 6.55% or RBE2 3.56%. Selected parameters were identified by performing a sensitivity analysis and the discrepancies was reduced by performing model updating procedure. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T12:46:16Z |
| format | Conference or Workshop Item |
| id | UMPir29854 |
| institution | Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T12:46:16Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | UMPir298542023-09-07T04:03:28Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29854/ Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints M. H. N., Izham M. S. M., Sani TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Experimental analysis is often viewed as an important source of reference compared to finite element due to the accuracy of giving reliable data. Currently, finite element analysis is widely used as an early adoption in development, hence trusting the finite element data is crucial for the user. Finite element analysis often shows discrepancies to the test result. The complexity of the joints (bolted) might cause the discrepancies to occur. This study aims to reduce the discrepancies between the experimental and numerical analysis on a frame structure with bolted joints by model updating. Model updating is a process of making adjustment to certain parameters of finite element model to reduce discrepancy between analytical predictions of finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental results. Modal properties (natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratio) of a frame structure with bolted joints are determined using both experimental modal analysis (EMA) and finite element analysis (FEA). Both data obtained is correlated before optimising the properties with sensitivity analysis. Joint strategy of this paper is focusing on RBE2, CBAR and CELAS element. CELAS was selected to represent the bolted modelling due to its lowest percentage average of 2.03% compares to CBAR 6.55% or RBE2 3.56%. Selected parameters were identified by performing a sensitivity analysis and the discrepancies was reduced by performing model updating procedure. IOP Publishing 2019-08-14 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29854/1/Model%20updating%20of%20frame%20structure%20with%20bolted%20joints.pdf M. H. N., Izham and M. S. M., Sani (2019) Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series; 1st Colloquium on Noise, Vibration and Comfort, CNVC 2019 , 7 March 2019 , Kelab Shah Alam, Selangor. pp. 1-9., 1262 (1). ISSN 1742-6588 (print); 1742-6596 (online) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1262/1/012023 |
| spellingShingle | TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery M. H. N., Izham M. S. M., Sani Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| title | Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| title_full | Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| title_fullStr | Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| title_full_unstemmed | Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| title_short | Model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| title_sort | model updating of frame structure with bolted joints |
| topic | TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery |
| url | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29854/1/Model%20updating%20of%20frame%20structure%20with%20bolted%20joints.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mhnizham modelupdatingofframestructurewithboltedjoints AT msmsani modelupdatingofframestructurewithboltedjoints |