Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing
Nowadays, brazing has been widely used in many industries, especially in the automotive application. The brazing process is introduced as it can be used to join the different metals together without melting the parent material. In this present study, furnace brazing and laser brazing of Ti-6Al- 4V t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32578/1/Comparative%20study%20between%20furnace%20brazing%20and%20laser%20brazing.pdf |
| _version_ | 1796994822691618816 |
|---|---|
| author | Y. Erny, A. M. Y. Fadhil, A. R. Aiman, Mohd Halil Mahadzir, Ishak Quazi, M. M. |
| author_facet | Y. Erny, A. M. Y. Fadhil, A. R. Aiman, Mohd Halil Mahadzir, Ishak Quazi, M. M. |
| author_sort | Y. Erny, A. M. Y. |
| collection | UMP |
| description | Nowadays, brazing has been widely used in many industries, especially in the automotive application. The brazing process is introduced as it can be used to join the different metals together without melting the parent material. In this present study, furnace brazing and laser brazing of Ti-6Al- 4V titanium alloy and 316 L stainless steel (SS) with silver-based, BAg 8-1.5Ti filler metal were studied. There are significantly different between furnace brazing, also known as conventional brazing method and laser brazing in terms of joining strength and microstructure reaction. Furnace brazing was performed at 870°C and 880°C with 30 minutes of heating duration. Meanwhile, laser brazing was performed using a 200Watt continuous wave laser with varying laser power. Both of brazing method was conducted with a vacuum pressure of 3×10−3 Pa. Besides, to maintain the accuracy of the temperature measurement of laser brazing, an infrared thermometer is used. The tensile test was conducted to analyse the mechanical properties. The cross-sections of the brazed joints have been examined using an optical microscope. The brazed joints of the furnace brazing show an average tensile strength of 55.89 kPa for 880°C and 43.16 kPa for 870°C. Nonetheless, the maximum tensile strength of laser brazed joints was 27.95 kPa, which is lower than furnace brazed joints. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T12:53:18Z |
| format | Conference or Workshop Item |
| id | UMPir32578 |
| institution | Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T12:53:18Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | UMPir325782022-02-08T07:22:46Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32578/ Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing Y. Erny, A. M. Y. Fadhil, A. R. Aiman, Mohd Halil Mahadzir, Ishak Quazi, M. M. TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Nowadays, brazing has been widely used in many industries, especially in the automotive application. The brazing process is introduced as it can be used to join the different metals together without melting the parent material. In this present study, furnace brazing and laser brazing of Ti-6Al- 4V titanium alloy and 316 L stainless steel (SS) with silver-based, BAg 8-1.5Ti filler metal were studied. There are significantly different between furnace brazing, also known as conventional brazing method and laser brazing in terms of joining strength and microstructure reaction. Furnace brazing was performed at 870°C and 880°C with 30 minutes of heating duration. Meanwhile, laser brazing was performed using a 200Watt continuous wave laser with varying laser power. Both of brazing method was conducted with a vacuum pressure of 3×10−3 Pa. Besides, to maintain the accuracy of the temperature measurement of laser brazing, an infrared thermometer is used. The tensile test was conducted to analyse the mechanical properties. The cross-sections of the brazed joints have been examined using an optical microscope. The brazed joints of the furnace brazing show an average tensile strength of 55.89 kPa for 880°C and 43.16 kPa for 870°C. Nonetheless, the maximum tensile strength of laser brazed joints was 27.95 kPa, which is lower than furnace brazed joints. IOP Publishing 2021 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32578/1/Comparative%20study%20between%20furnace%20brazing%20and%20laser%20brazing.pdf Y. Erny, A. M. Y. and Fadhil, A. R. and Aiman, Mohd Halil and Mahadzir, Ishak and Quazi, M. M. (2021) Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; International Conference on Automotive Innovation & Green Energy Vehicle (AIGEV 2020) , 10 - 11 November 2020 , Pekan, Malaysia. pp. 1-10., 1068 (012003). ISSN 1757-899X https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1068/1/012003 |
| spellingShingle | TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Y. Erny, A. M. Y. Fadhil, A. R. Aiman, Mohd Halil Mahadzir, Ishak Quazi, M. M. Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| title | Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| title_full | Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| title_fullStr | Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| title_short | Comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| title_sort | comparative study between furnace brazing and laser brazing |
| topic | TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery |
| url | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32578/1/Comparative%20study%20between%20furnace%20brazing%20and%20laser%20brazing.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yernyamy comparativestudybetweenfurnacebrazingandlaserbrazing AT fadhilar comparativestudybetweenfurnacebrazingandlaserbrazing AT aimanmohdhalil comparativestudybetweenfurnacebrazingandlaserbrazing AT mahadzirishak comparativestudybetweenfurnacebrazingandlaserbrazing AT quazimm comparativestudybetweenfurnacebrazingandlaserbrazing |