Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium

Spiking of the rare earth demand and price globally has put tremendous pressure to look for a new alternative in extractant that could provide better separation and higher output, yet with minimal cost. This work aimed to perform the techno-economic assessment on the new extractant against the conve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nurul Ain, Ismail, Mohammad Alwi, Abidin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35843/1/Techno-economic%20assessment%20of%20the%20separation.pdf
_version_ 1825814669530497024
author Nurul Ain, Ismail
Mohammad Alwi, Abidin
author_facet Nurul Ain, Ismail
Mohammad Alwi, Abidin
author_sort Nurul Ain, Ismail
collection UMP
description Spiking of the rare earth demand and price globally has put tremendous pressure to look for a new alternative in extractant that could provide better separation and higher output, yet with minimal cost. This work aimed to perform the techno-economic assessment on the new extractant against the conventional extractants; DEHPA and 2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid-2-ethylhexyl ester (EHEHPA) in pursuance of evaluating the feasibility of these extractants on an industrial scale. This work focused on a recent extractant type, which incorporates two common extractants and produces a bifunctional ionic liquid called [A336][DEHPA]. It is a mixture of Aliquat 336 (A336) and di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (DEHPA) through acid/base neutralization. Previously, [A336][DEHPA] has shown good extraction capabilities with low extraction stages in the separation of samarium, europium, and gadolinium. EHEHPA has been selected as the baseline using the information from the literature. The assessment is divided into two scenarios; 1) the separation of samarium from the middle rare earth concentrate and 2) the separation of europium and gadolinium. The analysis outcome reveals that for both scenarios, DEHPA manages to provide 99.9% purity and 90% recovery of rare earth with lower investment compared to the EHEHPA. Although the [A336][DEHPA] could provide an environmental-friendly option, the enormous expenses make the process infeasible.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T13:02:00Z
format Article
id UMPir35843
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T13:02:00Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format dspace
spelling UMPir358432022-12-06T02:42:23Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35843/ Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium Nurul Ain, Ismail Mohammad Alwi, Abidin TP Chemical technology Spiking of the rare earth demand and price globally has put tremendous pressure to look for a new alternative in extractant that could provide better separation and higher output, yet with minimal cost. This work aimed to perform the techno-economic assessment on the new extractant against the conventional extractants; DEHPA and 2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid-2-ethylhexyl ester (EHEHPA) in pursuance of evaluating the feasibility of these extractants on an industrial scale. This work focused on a recent extractant type, which incorporates two common extractants and produces a bifunctional ionic liquid called [A336][DEHPA]. It is a mixture of Aliquat 336 (A336) and di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (DEHPA) through acid/base neutralization. Previously, [A336][DEHPA] has shown good extraction capabilities with low extraction stages in the separation of samarium, europium, and gadolinium. EHEHPA has been selected as the baseline using the information from the literature. The assessment is divided into two scenarios; 1) the separation of samarium from the middle rare earth concentrate and 2) the separation of europium and gadolinium. The analysis outcome reveals that for both scenarios, DEHPA manages to provide 99.9% purity and 90% recovery of rare earth with lower investment compared to the EHEHPA. Although the [A336][DEHPA] could provide an environmental-friendly option, the enormous expenses make the process infeasible. Elsevier Ltd. 2021 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35843/1/Techno-economic%20assessment%20of%20the%20separation.pdf Nurul Ain, Ismail and Mohammad Alwi, Abidin (2021) Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 121 (102958). pp. 1-5. ISSN 1474-7065. (Published) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102958 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102958
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Nurul Ain, Ismail
Mohammad Alwi, Abidin
Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
title Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
title_full Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
title_fullStr Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
title_full_unstemmed Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
title_short Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
title_sort techno economic assessment of the separation of samarium europium and gadolinium
topic TP Chemical technology
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35843/1/Techno-economic%20assessment%20of%20the%20separation.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nurulainismail technoeconomicassessmentoftheseparationofsamariumeuropiumandgadolinium
AT mohammadalwiabidin technoeconomicassessmentoftheseparationofsamariumeuropiumandgadolinium