Object tracking for autonomous vehicle using YOLO V3

Accuracy and performance of an object detection model have always been the main requirements for an object tracking system. In this project, the performance of machine learning based object detection using YOLO v3 technique will be investigated. Two models were provided where one model is trained us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hung, William Chin Wei, Muhammad Aizzat, Zakaria, Muhammad Izhar, Ishak, Mohamad Heerwan, Peeie
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/39447/1/Object%20Tracking%20for%20Autonomous%20Vehicle%20Using%20YOLO%20V3.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/39447/2/Object%20tracking%20for%20autonomous%20vehicle%20using%20YOLO%20V3_ABS.pdf
Description
Summary:Accuracy and performance of an object detection model have always been the main requirements for an object tracking system. In this project, the performance of machine learning based object detection using YOLO v3 technique will be investigated. Two models were provided where one model is trained using online Common Objects in Contact (COCO) dataset only, and the other model is trained with additional images from Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) with several different locations dataset. The performance of the trained models were evaluated using mean Average Precision (mAP), and precision techniques. The model with highest precision was selected to be implemented on actual road test. The results show that the model 2 has the highest precision and was able to detect every class of objects. Each output box had displayed the class and the distance to the objects from the RGBD camera of the vehicle. It is observed that the first model that was trained to perform the mAP value of 90.2% and a performance of 0.484 precision. For the second model, it can be seen that the accuracy of the detections are higher than that of model 1. Therefore, model 2 has a better performance with a value of 0.596 precision.