Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity

Production of ethanol from lactose by fermentation with the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus (ATCC 46537)under various sonication regimens is reported. Batch fermentations were carried out at low-intensity sonication (11.8Wcm−2 sonication intensity at the sonotrode tip) using 10%, 20% and 40% duty cycl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman, Azilah, Ajit, R. M., Yunus, Chisti, Yusuf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bej 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/4501/1/Dr._A.Ziad_SD1.pdf
_version_ 1825821513286156288
author Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman
Azilah, Ajit
R. M., Yunus
Chisti, Yusuf
author_facet Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman
Azilah, Ajit
R. M., Yunus
Chisti, Yusuf
author_sort Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman
collection UMP
description Production of ethanol from lactose by fermentation with the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus (ATCC 46537)under various sonication regimens is reported. Batch fermentations were carried out at low-intensity sonication (11.8Wcm−2 sonication intensity at the sonotrode tip) using 10%, 20% and 40% duty cycles. (A duty cycle of 10%, for example,wasequivalent to sonication for 1 s followed by a rest period (no sonication)of 10 s.) Fermentations were carried out in a 7.5 L (3 L working volume) stirred bioreactor. The sonotrode was mounted in an external chamber and the fermentation broth was continuously recirculated between the bioreactor and the sonication chamber. The flow rate through the sonication loop was 0.2 L min−1.All duty cycles tested improved ethanol production relative to control (no sonication). A 20% duty cycle appeared to be optimal. With this cycle, a final ethanol concentration of 5.20±0.68 g L−1 was obtained, or nearly 3.5-fold that of the control fermentation. Sonication at 10% and 20% cycles appeared to stimulate yeast growth compared to the control fermentation, but 40% duty cycle had a measureable adverse impact on cell growth. Sonication at 10% and 20% cycles enhanced both the extracellular and the intracellular levels of -galactosidase enzyme. Although at the highest duty cycle sonication reduced cell growth, cell viability remained at ≥70% during most of the fermentation. Sonication at a controlled temperature can be used to substantially enhance productivity of bioethanol fermentations
first_indexed 2024-03-06T11:42:40Z
format Article
id UMPir4501
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T11:42:40Z
publishDate 2011
publisher journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bej
record_format dspace
spelling UMPir45012020-06-09T02:54:07Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/4501/ Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman Azilah, Ajit R. M., Yunus Chisti, Yusuf TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Production of ethanol from lactose by fermentation with the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus (ATCC 46537)under various sonication regimens is reported. Batch fermentations were carried out at low-intensity sonication (11.8Wcm−2 sonication intensity at the sonotrode tip) using 10%, 20% and 40% duty cycles. (A duty cycle of 10%, for example,wasequivalent to sonication for 1 s followed by a rest period (no sonication)of 10 s.) Fermentations were carried out in a 7.5 L (3 L working volume) stirred bioreactor. The sonotrode was mounted in an external chamber and the fermentation broth was continuously recirculated between the bioreactor and the sonication chamber. The flow rate through the sonication loop was 0.2 L min−1.All duty cycles tested improved ethanol production relative to control (no sonication). A 20% duty cycle appeared to be optimal. With this cycle, a final ethanol concentration of 5.20±0.68 g L−1 was obtained, or nearly 3.5-fold that of the control fermentation. Sonication at 10% and 20% cycles appeared to stimulate yeast growth compared to the control fermentation, but 40% duty cycle had a measureable adverse impact on cell growth. Sonication at 10% and 20% cycles enhanced both the extracellular and the intracellular levels of -galactosidase enzyme. Although at the highest duty cycle sonication reduced cell growth, cell viability remained at ≥70% during most of the fermentation. Sonication at a controlled temperature can be used to substantially enhance productivity of bioethanol fermentations journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bej 2011-02-24 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/4501/1/Dr._A.Ziad_SD1.pdf Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman and Azilah, Ajit and R. M., Yunus and Chisti, Yusuf (2011) Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity. Biochemical Engineering Journal. pp. 141-150. (Published) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X11000209 DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.01.006
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Ahmad Ziad, Sulaiman
Azilah, Ajit
R. M., Yunus
Chisti, Yusuf
Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
title Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
title_full Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
title_fullStr Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
title_short Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
title_sort ultrasound assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/4501/1/Dr._A.Ziad_SD1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadziadsulaiman ultrasoundassistedfermentationenhancesbioethanolproductivity
AT azilahajit ultrasoundassistedfermentationenhancesbioethanolproductivity
AT rmyunus ultrasoundassistedfermentationenhancesbioethanolproductivity
AT chistiyusuf ultrasoundassistedfermentationenhancesbioethanolproductivity