Active Participation and Interaction, Key Performance Factors of Face-to-Face Learning
During the last decade and, particularly, from the restrictions on mobility brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, online and digital teaching is positioning itself as an alternative to face-to-face teaching. As of today, however, the soundness of this alternative teaching in terms of learning outcomes a...
Main Authors: | Miguel Marco-Fondevila, Mar Rueda-Tomás, María Pilar Latorre-Martínez |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Education Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/7/429 |
Similar Items
-
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
by: Stéphane Plaszczynski, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Face Recognition and Tracking Framework for Human–Robot Interaction
by: Aly Khalifa, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Comparative Study of the Effect of Three Teaching Methods of Group, Personal (Face-to-Face), and Compact Disc on Correcting the Pronunciation and Reading of the Prayer in the Students of Qom University of Medical Sciences
by: Shabanali Khansanami, et al.
Published: (2013-07-01) -
Teachers’ Perceptions, Preparations, And Challenges in the Implementation of Limited Face-To-Face Classroom Interaction in the New Normal
by: Hyacinth Pearl E. Hayahay, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Speech Driven Gaze in a Face-to-Face Interaction
by: Ülkü Arslan Aydin, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)