Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction

Background Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction surgery with nipple-sparing mastectomy has recently been favored by patients. However, in patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures, it is difficult to select the appropriate implant size, making it challenging to achieve a symm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jung Yeol Seo, Seung Hyun Kim, Jae Woo Lee, Min Wook Kim, Dae Kyun Jeong, Seong Hwan Bae, Hyun Yul Kim, Youn Joo Jung, Su Bong Nam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2023-07-01
Series:Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-aaps.org/upload/pdf/aaps-2022-00689.pdf
_version_ 1797755711447367680
author Jung Yeol Seo
Seung Hyun Kim
Jae Woo Lee
Min Wook Kim
Dae Kyun Jeong
Seong Hwan Bae
Hyun Yul Kim
Youn Joo Jung
Su Bong Nam
author_facet Jung Yeol Seo
Seung Hyun Kim
Jae Woo Lee
Min Wook Kim
Dae Kyun Jeong
Seong Hwan Bae
Hyun Yul Kim
Youn Joo Jung
Su Bong Nam
author_sort Jung Yeol Seo
collection DOAJ
description Background Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction surgery with nipple-sparing mastectomy has recently been favored by patients. However, in patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures, it is difficult to select the appropriate implant size, making it challenging to achieve a symmetrical breast shape. Therefore, this study investigated the differences in breast asymmetry and other complications in patients who underwent a two-stage procedure or direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction to determine whether the two-stage procedure can produce more favorable outcomes. Methods The participants of this study were patients who underwent immediate two-stage breast reconstruction or DTI breast reconstruction from May 2018 to April 2022, did not receive postoperative radiotherapy, and did not wish to undergo any balancing procedures. An acellular dermal matrix was used for breast reconstruction in all patients, and a single reconstructive surgeon performed all the operations. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results No significant differences in complications were found between the patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction and those who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction. In the two-stage breast reconstruction group, breast volume asymmetry was observed in 18.4% (seven patients), which was significantly lower than the percentage of 44.7% (17 patients) observed in the DTI group. Conclusions Breast asymmetry was observed in a significant proportion of the patients in both groups. However, because breast volume asymmetry was more common in the DTI group than in the two-stage breast reconstruction group, two-stage breast reconstruction may be a favorable method for patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:51:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0038c6a6051e40b1b96010f632f01460
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-0831
2288-9337
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:51:07Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Korean Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
record_format Article
series Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-0038c6a6051e40b1b96010f632f014602023-08-03T06:11:18ZengKorean Society for Aesthetic Plastic SurgeryArchives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery2234-08312288-93372023-07-0129313614010.14730/aaps.2022.00689809Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstructionJung Yeol Seo0Seung Hyun Kim1Jae Woo Lee2Min Wook Kim3Dae Kyun Jeong4Seong Hwan Bae5Hyun Yul Kim6Youn Joo Jung7Su Bong Nam8 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, KoreaBackground Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction surgery with nipple-sparing mastectomy has recently been favored by patients. However, in patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures, it is difficult to select the appropriate implant size, making it challenging to achieve a symmetrical breast shape. Therefore, this study investigated the differences in breast asymmetry and other complications in patients who underwent a two-stage procedure or direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction to determine whether the two-stage procedure can produce more favorable outcomes. Methods The participants of this study were patients who underwent immediate two-stage breast reconstruction or DTI breast reconstruction from May 2018 to April 2022, did not receive postoperative radiotherapy, and did not wish to undergo any balancing procedures. An acellular dermal matrix was used for breast reconstruction in all patients, and a single reconstructive surgeon performed all the operations. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results No significant differences in complications were found between the patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction and those who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction. In the two-stage breast reconstruction group, breast volume asymmetry was observed in 18.4% (seven patients), which was significantly lower than the percentage of 44.7% (17 patients) observed in the DTI group. Conclusions Breast asymmetry was observed in a significant proportion of the patients in both groups. However, because breast volume asymmetry was more common in the DTI group than in the two-stage breast reconstruction group, two-stage breast reconstruction may be a favorable method for patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures.http://e-aaps.org/upload/pdf/aaps-2022-00689.pdfmammaplastybreast implantscomplication
spellingShingle Jung Yeol Seo
Seung Hyun Kim
Jae Woo Lee
Min Wook Kim
Dae Kyun Jeong
Seong Hwan Bae
Hyun Yul Kim
Youn Joo Jung
Su Bong Nam
Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
mammaplasty
breast implants
complication
title Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
title_full Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
title_fullStr Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
title_short Differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two-stage and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
title_sort differences in complications and asymmetry in patients who did not receive a balancing procedure in two stage and direct to implant breast reconstruction
topic mammaplasty
breast implants
complication
url http://e-aaps.org/upload/pdf/aaps-2022-00689.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jungyeolseo differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT seunghyunkim differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT jaewoolee differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT minwookkim differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT daekyunjeong differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT seonghwanbae differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT hyunyulkim differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT younjoojung differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction
AT subongnam differencesincomplicationsandasymmetryinpatientswhodidnotreceiveabalancingprocedureintwostageanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstruction