Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments

Performance standards are arguably one of the most controversial topics in educational measurement. There are uses of assessments such as licensure and certification where performance standards are essential. There are many other uses, however, where performance standards have been mandated or becom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert L. Linn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2003-09-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/259
_version_ 1811295389178920960
author Robert L. Linn
author_facet Robert L. Linn
author_sort Robert L. Linn
collection DOAJ
description Performance standards are arguably one of the most controversial topics in educational measurement. There are uses of assessments such as licensure and certification where performance standards are essential. There are many other uses, however, where performance standards have been mandated or become the preferred method of reporting assessment results where the standards are not essential to the use. Distinctions between essential and nonessential uses of performance standards are discussed. It is argued that the insistence on reporting in terms of performance standards in situations where they are not essential has been more harmful than helpful. Variability in the definitions of proficient academic achievement by states for purposes of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is discussed and it is argued that the variability is so great that characterizing achievement is meaningless. Illustrations of the great uncertainty in standards are provided.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:32:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-003dcbea361e47ee82506b4a902af4fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-2341
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:32:40Z
publishDate 2003-09-01
publisher Arizona State University
record_format Article
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
spelling doaj.art-003dcbea361e47ee82506b4a902af4fb2022-12-22T03:00:23ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412003-09-011131Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of AssessmentsRobert L. LinnPerformance standards are arguably one of the most controversial topics in educational measurement. There are uses of assessments such as licensure and certification where performance standards are essential. There are many other uses, however, where performance standards have been mandated or become the preferred method of reporting assessment results where the standards are not essential to the use. Distinctions between essential and nonessential uses of performance standards are discussed. It is argued that the insistence on reporting in terms of performance standards in situations where they are not essential has been more harmful than helpful. Variability in the definitions of proficient academic achievement by states for purposes of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is discussed and it is argued that the variability is so great that characterizing achievement is meaningless. Illustrations of the great uncertainty in standards are provided.http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/259
spellingShingle Robert L. Linn
Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments
Education Policy Analysis Archives
title Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments
title_full Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments
title_fullStr Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments
title_short Performance Standards': Utility for Different Uses of Assessments
title_sort performance standards utility for different uses of assessments
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/259
work_keys_str_mv AT robertllinn performancestandardsutilityfordifferentusesofassessments