Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of <i>in vitro</i> bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/14/3915 |
_version_ | 1797526694845743104 |
---|---|
author | Tamara Peric Evgenija Markovic Dejan Markovic Bojan Petrovic |
author_facet | Tamara Peric Evgenija Markovic Dejan Markovic Bojan Petrovic |
author_sort | Tamara Peric |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of <i>in vitro</i> bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published until April 2021. The search strategy was: (“glass”) and (“ionomer”) and (“primary” or “deciduous”) and (“bond” or “tensile” or “shear”). Two researchers independently retrieved articles that reported on the bond strength of GIC to primary dentin and/or enamel. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the bond strength values of conventional (C) GIC and resin-modified (RM) GIC to different substrates. From 831 potentially eligible articles, 30 were selected for the full-text examination, and 7 were included in the analysis. Studies were rated at high (3), medium (3), and low (1) risk of bias. RM-GIC showed higher bond strength to primary enamel and dentin compared to the C-GIC. Meta-analysis of <i>in vitro</i> studies, evaluating bonding properties of GI restoratives to primary teeth, suggests the superior performance of RM-GIC. However, there is a lack of studies that examine the properties of novel GI formulations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:33:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0044cc716cc24ae1ba5a91713969ef9e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1944 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:33:00Z |
publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Materials |
spelling | doaj.art-0044cc716cc24ae1ba5a91713969ef9e2023-11-22T04:16:46ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-07-011414391510.3390/ma14143915Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary TeethTamara Peric0Evgenija Markovic1Dejan Markovic2Bojan Petrovic3School of Dental Medicine, Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotića 11, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Orthodontics, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotića 11, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry Clinic of Vojvodina, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaRestoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of <i>in vitro</i> bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published until April 2021. The search strategy was: (“glass”) and (“ionomer”) and (“primary” or “deciduous”) and (“bond” or “tensile” or “shear”). Two researchers independently retrieved articles that reported on the bond strength of GIC to primary dentin and/or enamel. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the bond strength values of conventional (C) GIC and resin-modified (RM) GIC to different substrates. From 831 potentially eligible articles, 30 were selected for the full-text examination, and 7 were included in the analysis. Studies were rated at high (3), medium (3), and low (1) risk of bias. RM-GIC showed higher bond strength to primary enamel and dentin compared to the C-GIC. Meta-analysis of <i>in vitro</i> studies, evaluating bonding properties of GI restoratives to primary teeth, suggests the superior performance of RM-GIC. However, there is a lack of studies that examine the properties of novel GI formulations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/14/3915primary teethrestorationglass-ionomer cementsbond strength testmeta-analysis |
spellingShingle | Tamara Peric Evgenija Markovic Dejan Markovic Bojan Petrovic Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth Materials primary teeth restoration glass-ionomer cements bond strength test meta-analysis |
title | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_full | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_fullStr | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_short | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_sort | meta analysis of in vitro bonding of glass ionomer restorative materials to primary teeth |
topic | primary teeth restoration glass-ionomer cements bond strength test meta-analysis |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/14/3915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamaraperic metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth AT evgenijamarkovic metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth AT dejanmarkovic metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth AT bojanpetrovic metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth |