Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines

The automaticity of reading is often explored through the Stroop effect, whereby color-naming is affected by color words. Color associates (e.g., ‘sky’) also produce a Stroop effect, suggesting that automatic reading occurs through to the level of semantics, even when reading sub-lexically (e.g., th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric eLorentz, Tessa eMcKibben, Chelsea eEkstrand, Layla eGould, Kathryn eAnton, Ron eBorowsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386/full
_version_ 1818318835676086272
author Eric eLorentz
Tessa eMcKibben
Chelsea eEkstrand
Layla eGould
Kathryn eAnton
Ron eBorowsky
author_facet Eric eLorentz
Tessa eMcKibben
Chelsea eEkstrand
Layla eGould
Kathryn eAnton
Ron eBorowsky
author_sort Eric eLorentz
collection DOAJ
description The automaticity of reading is often explored through the Stroop effect, whereby color-naming is affected by color words. Color associates (e.g., ‘sky’) also produce a Stroop effect, suggesting that automatic reading occurs through to the level of semantics, even when reading sub-lexically (e.g., the pseudohomophone ‘skigh’). However, several previous experiments have confounded congruency with contingency learning, whereby faster responding occurs for more frequent stimuli. Contingency effects reflect a higher frequency-pairing of the word with a font color in the congruent condition than in the incongruent condition due to the limited set of congruent pairings. To determine the extent to which the Stroop effect can be attributed to contingency learning of font colors paired with lexical (word-level) and sub-lexical (phonetically decoded) letter strings, as well as assess facilitation and interference relative to contingency effects, we developed two neutral baselines: each one matched on pair-frequency for congruent and incongruent color words. In Experiments 1 and 3, color words (e.g., ‘blue’) and their pseudohomophones (e.g., ‘bloo’) produced significant facilitation and interference relative to neutral baselines, regardless of whether the onset (i.e., first phoneme) was matched to the color words. Color associates (e.g., ‘ocean’) and their pseudohomophones (e.g., ‘oshin’), however, showed no significant facilitation or interference relative to onset matched neutral baselines (Experiment 2). When onsets were unmatched, color associate words produced consistent facilitation on RT (e.g., ‘ocean’ vs. ‘dozen’), but pseudohomophones (e.g., ‘oshin’ vs. ‘duhzen’) failed to produce facilitation or interference. Our findings suggest that the Stroop effects for color and associated stimuli are sensitive to the type of neutral baseline used, as well as stimulus type (word vs. pseudohomophone). In general, contingency learning plays a large role when repeating congruent items more than incongruent items, but appropriate pair-frequency matched neutral baselines allow for the assessment of genuine facilitation and interference. Using such baselines, we found reading processes proceed to a semantic level for familiar words, but not pseudohomophones (i.e., phonetic decoding). Such assessment is critical for separating the effects of genuine congruency from contingency during automatic word reading in the Stroop task, and when used with color associates, isolates the semantic contribution.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:59:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-004c6162b5024090a9253d15359d9141
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:59:32Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-004c6162b5024090a9253d15359d91412022-12-21T23:51:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-03-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386181420Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral BaselinesEric eLorentz0Tessa eMcKibben1Chelsea eEkstrand2Layla eGould3Kathryn eAnton4Ron eBorowsky5University of SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanThe automaticity of reading is often explored through the Stroop effect, whereby color-naming is affected by color words. Color associates (e.g., ‘sky’) also produce a Stroop effect, suggesting that automatic reading occurs through to the level of semantics, even when reading sub-lexically (e.g., the pseudohomophone ‘skigh’). However, several previous experiments have confounded congruency with contingency learning, whereby faster responding occurs for more frequent stimuli. Contingency effects reflect a higher frequency-pairing of the word with a font color in the congruent condition than in the incongruent condition due to the limited set of congruent pairings. To determine the extent to which the Stroop effect can be attributed to contingency learning of font colors paired with lexical (word-level) and sub-lexical (phonetically decoded) letter strings, as well as assess facilitation and interference relative to contingency effects, we developed two neutral baselines: each one matched on pair-frequency for congruent and incongruent color words. In Experiments 1 and 3, color words (e.g., ‘blue’) and their pseudohomophones (e.g., ‘bloo’) produced significant facilitation and interference relative to neutral baselines, regardless of whether the onset (i.e., first phoneme) was matched to the color words. Color associates (e.g., ‘ocean’) and their pseudohomophones (e.g., ‘oshin’), however, showed no significant facilitation or interference relative to onset matched neutral baselines (Experiment 2). When onsets were unmatched, color associate words produced consistent facilitation on RT (e.g., ‘ocean’ vs. ‘dozen’), but pseudohomophones (e.g., ‘oshin’ vs. ‘duhzen’) failed to produce facilitation or interference. Our findings suggest that the Stroop effects for color and associated stimuli are sensitive to the type of neutral baseline used, as well as stimulus type (word vs. pseudohomophone). In general, contingency learning plays a large role when repeating congruent items more than incongruent items, but appropriate pair-frequency matched neutral baselines allow for the assessment of genuine facilitation and interference. Using such baselines, we found reading processes proceed to a semantic level for familiar words, but not pseudohomophones (i.e., phonetic decoding). Such assessment is critical for separating the effects of genuine congruency from contingency during automatic word reading in the Stroop task, and when used with color associates, isolates the semantic contribution.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386/fullreadingsemanticscontingency learningStroop effectpseudohomophonescolor associates
spellingShingle Eric eLorentz
Tessa eMcKibben
Chelsea eEkstrand
Layla eGould
Kathryn eAnton
Ron eBorowsky
Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines
Frontiers in Psychology
reading
semantics
contingency learning
Stroop effect
pseudohomophones
color associates
title Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines
title_full Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines
title_fullStr Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines
title_short Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines
title_sort disentangling genuine semantic stroop effects in reading from contingency effects on the need for two neutral baselines
topic reading
semantics
contingency learning
Stroop effect
pseudohomophones
color associates
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ericelorentz disentanglinggenuinesemanticstroopeffectsinreadingfromcontingencyeffectsontheneedfortwoneutralbaselines
AT tessaemckibben disentanglinggenuinesemanticstroopeffectsinreadingfromcontingencyeffectsontheneedfortwoneutralbaselines
AT chelseaeekstrand disentanglinggenuinesemanticstroopeffectsinreadingfromcontingencyeffectsontheneedfortwoneutralbaselines
AT laylaegould disentanglinggenuinesemanticstroopeffectsinreadingfromcontingencyeffectsontheneedfortwoneutralbaselines
AT kathryneanton disentanglinggenuinesemanticstroopeffectsinreadingfromcontingencyeffectsontheneedfortwoneutralbaselines
AT roneborowsky disentanglinggenuinesemanticstroopeffectsinreadingfromcontingencyeffectsontheneedfortwoneutralbaselines