Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial

Abstract Backgrounds and Aims This controlled randomized clinical trial was designed to compare effectiveness, side effects, and severity of symptoms before and after therapy between quadruple (QT) and sequential regimens (SQ) for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori). Methods Patients were randomly alloc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elham Tabesh, Farzad Yadmehr, Awat Feizi, Farzin Khorvash, Setayesh Sindarreh, Atousa Hakamifard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1842
_version_ 1797331662874345472
author Elham Tabesh
Farzad Yadmehr
Awat Feizi
Farzin Khorvash
Setayesh Sindarreh
Atousa Hakamifard
author_facet Elham Tabesh
Farzad Yadmehr
Awat Feizi
Farzin Khorvash
Setayesh Sindarreh
Atousa Hakamifard
author_sort Elham Tabesh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Backgrounds and Aims This controlled randomized clinical trial was designed to compare effectiveness, side effects, and severity of symptoms before and after therapy between quadruple (QT) and sequential regimens (SQ) for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori). Methods Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A received a 14‐day QT including pantoprazole 40 mg q12 h, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg q12 h, clarithromycin 500 mg q12 h, and amoxicillin 1000 mg q12 h and group B received ST including pantoprazole 40 mg q12 h and amoxicillin 1000 mg q12 h for the initial 5 days followed by pantoprazole 40 mg q12 h, clarithromycin 500 mg q12 h and tinidazole 500 mg q12 h for the next 5 days. Adverse drug reactions and patients' compliance were assessed after finishing the treatment course and also 4 weeks after. All patients were naive, therefore ST and QT were first‐line therapies. To evaluate severity of symptoms we used Short‐Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF‐LDQ) before taking the first dose of regimens, at the end of therapy, and also 4 weeks after (follow‐up). Results The mean age in Group A (n = 83) was 48.55 ± 12.56 and 47.24 ± 12.78 in Group B (n = 79). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding age, gender, endoscopic findings, and also eradication rate. The analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in SF‐LDQ score between baseline and after therapy and baseline and follow‐up in both regimen groups. Both regimens were well tolerated by the majority of patients, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse drug reactions Conclusion This study showed that ST can be used as an alternative first‐line therapy to QT in patients with H. pylori infection.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:37:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-004d5dfd0e354361ba9c6120260b6bc4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:37:44Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-004d5dfd0e354361ba9c6120260b6bc42024-02-02T18:04:59ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352024-01-0171n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.1842Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trialElham Tabesh0Farzad Yadmehr1Awat Feizi2Farzin Khorvash3Setayesh Sindarreh4Atousa Hakamifard5Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranNosocomial Infection Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranCancer Prevention Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranAbstract Backgrounds and Aims This controlled randomized clinical trial was designed to compare effectiveness, side effects, and severity of symptoms before and after therapy between quadruple (QT) and sequential regimens (SQ) for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori). Methods Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A received a 14‐day QT including pantoprazole 40 mg q12 h, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg q12 h, clarithromycin 500 mg q12 h, and amoxicillin 1000 mg q12 h and group B received ST including pantoprazole 40 mg q12 h and amoxicillin 1000 mg q12 h for the initial 5 days followed by pantoprazole 40 mg q12 h, clarithromycin 500 mg q12 h and tinidazole 500 mg q12 h for the next 5 days. Adverse drug reactions and patients' compliance were assessed after finishing the treatment course and also 4 weeks after. All patients were naive, therefore ST and QT were first‐line therapies. To evaluate severity of symptoms we used Short‐Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF‐LDQ) before taking the first dose of regimens, at the end of therapy, and also 4 weeks after (follow‐up). Results The mean age in Group A (n = 83) was 48.55 ± 12.56 and 47.24 ± 12.78 in Group B (n = 79). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding age, gender, endoscopic findings, and also eradication rate. The analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in SF‐LDQ score between baseline and after therapy and baseline and follow‐up in both regimen groups. Both regimens were well tolerated by the majority of patients, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse drug reactions Conclusion This study showed that ST can be used as an alternative first‐line therapy to QT in patients with H. pylori infection.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1842Helicobacter pylorieradicationquadruplesequential
spellingShingle Elham Tabesh
Farzad Yadmehr
Awat Feizi
Farzin Khorvash
Setayesh Sindarreh
Atousa Hakamifard
Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
Health Science Reports
Helicobacter pylori
eradication
quadruple
sequential
title Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Helicobacter pylori
eradication
quadruple
sequential
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1842
work_keys_str_mv AT elhamtabesh sequentialtherapyversusquadrupletherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT farzadyadmehr sequentialtherapyversusquadrupletherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT awatfeizi sequentialtherapyversusquadrupletherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT farzinkhorvash sequentialtherapyversusquadrupletherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT setayeshsindarreh sequentialtherapyversusquadrupletherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT atousahakamifard sequentialtherapyversusquadrupletherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial