Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population

Introduction: Approximately 5%–11% of neurologically normal population has extensor plantar response (EPR). Method: This study is aimed to identify differentiating features of EPR between physiological and pathological population. Results: A total of 43 patients with pyramidal lesions and 113 normal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shweh Fern Loo, Nicole Kelsie Justin, Ri An Lee, Yin Cheng Hew, Kheng Seang Lim, Chong Tin Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2018;volume=21;issue=2;spage=144;epage=149;aulast=Loo
_version_ 1811294530632155136
author Shweh Fern Loo
Nicole Kelsie Justin
Ri An Lee
Yin Cheng Hew
Kheng Seang Lim
Chong Tin Tan
author_facet Shweh Fern Loo
Nicole Kelsie Justin
Ri An Lee
Yin Cheng Hew
Kheng Seang Lim
Chong Tin Tan
author_sort Shweh Fern Loo
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Approximately 5%–11% of neurologically normal population has extensor plantar response (EPR). Method: This study is aimed to identify differentiating features of EPR between physiological and pathological population. Results: A total of 43 patients with pyramidal lesions and 113 normal controls were recruited for this study. The pathological EPRs were more reproducible, with 89.4% having at least two positive Babinski responses and 91.5% having two positive Chaddock responses (vs. 14.3% and 4.8% in controls, P < 0.001). The pathological EPR was more sensitive to stimulation, in which 89.1% were elicited when the stimulation reached mid-lateral sole (vs. 11.9% in controls, P < 0.001). Most (93.6%) pathological cases had sustained big toe extension throughout stimulation (vs. 73.8% in controls, P < 0.001). As compared to those with brain lesion, the plantar responses in those with spinal lesion are less likely to have ankle dorsiflexion (5.3% vs. 25%, P < 0.05) more likely to have sustained extensor response with Babinski (94.7% vs. 71.4%, P < 0.05), Chaddock (89.5% vs. 64.3%, P < 0.05), and Schaefer (26.3% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.05) methods. A scoring system was computed using four variables, i.e., two consecutive positive Babinski or Chaddock responses, extensor response at mid-lateral sole, and sustained extension throughout stimulation. A score ≥3 is predictive of pathological origin, with sensitivity and specificity of 78.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The pathological EPR is more reproducible, sensitive to stimulation, and sustainable compared to physiological extensor response.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:18:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-004dc0d8dc6b45c0a99cebbb055e1bb1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-2327
1998-3549
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:18:55Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
spelling doaj.art-004dc0d8dc6b45c0a99cebbb055e1bb12022-12-22T03:00:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology0972-23271998-35492018-01-0121214414910.4103/aian.AIAN_254_17Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal populationShweh Fern LooNicole Kelsie JustinRi An LeeYin Cheng HewKheng Seang LimChong Tin TanIntroduction: Approximately 5%–11% of neurologically normal population has extensor plantar response (EPR). Method: This study is aimed to identify differentiating features of EPR between physiological and pathological population. Results: A total of 43 patients with pyramidal lesions and 113 normal controls were recruited for this study. The pathological EPRs were more reproducible, with 89.4% having at least two positive Babinski responses and 91.5% having two positive Chaddock responses (vs. 14.3% and 4.8% in controls, P < 0.001). The pathological EPR was more sensitive to stimulation, in which 89.1% were elicited when the stimulation reached mid-lateral sole (vs. 11.9% in controls, P < 0.001). Most (93.6%) pathological cases had sustained big toe extension throughout stimulation (vs. 73.8% in controls, P < 0.001). As compared to those with brain lesion, the plantar responses in those with spinal lesion are less likely to have ankle dorsiflexion (5.3% vs. 25%, P < 0.05) more likely to have sustained extensor response with Babinski (94.7% vs. 71.4%, P < 0.05), Chaddock (89.5% vs. 64.3%, P < 0.05), and Schaefer (26.3% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.05) methods. A scoring system was computed using four variables, i.e., two consecutive positive Babinski or Chaddock responses, extensor response at mid-lateral sole, and sustained extension throughout stimulation. A score ≥3 is predictive of pathological origin, with sensitivity and specificity of 78.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The pathological EPR is more reproducible, sensitive to stimulation, and sustainable compared to physiological extensor response.http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2018;volume=21;issue=2;spage=144;epage=149;aulast=LooBabinskiChaddockphysiological plantar responseplantar responsereflexSchaefer
spellingShingle Shweh Fern Loo
Nicole Kelsie Justin
Ri An Lee
Yin Cheng Hew
Kheng Seang Lim
Chong Tin Tan
Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Babinski
Chaddock
physiological plantar response
plantar response
reflex
Schaefer
title Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
title_full Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
title_fullStr Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
title_short Differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
title_sort differentiating extensor plantar response in pathological and normal population
topic Babinski
Chaddock
physiological plantar response
plantar response
reflex
Schaefer
url http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2018;volume=21;issue=2;spage=144;epage=149;aulast=Loo
work_keys_str_mv AT shwehfernloo differentiatingextensorplantarresponseinpathologicalandnormalpopulation
AT nicolekelsiejustin differentiatingextensorplantarresponseinpathologicalandnormalpopulation
AT rianlee differentiatingextensorplantarresponseinpathologicalandnormalpopulation
AT yinchenghew differentiatingextensorplantarresponseinpathologicalandnormalpopulation
AT khengseanglim differentiatingextensorplantarresponseinpathologicalandnormalpopulation
AT chongtintan differentiatingextensorplantarresponseinpathologicalandnormalpopulation