The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
One of the prescriptions for adaptive comanagement of social-ecological systems is to follow a bioregional approach. In water resources management, experience has been gained with a bioregional approach by the foundation of river basin organizations (RBOs). Here, we summarize the results of a resear...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2017-06-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art41/ |
| _version_ | 1830190198437183488 |
|---|---|
| author | Sander Meijerink Dave Huitema |
| author_facet | Sander Meijerink Dave Huitema |
| author_sort | Sander Meijerink |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | One of the prescriptions for adaptive comanagement of social-ecological systems is to follow a bioregional approach. In water resources management, experience has been gained with a bioregional approach by the foundation of river basin organizations (RBOs). Here, we summarize the results of a research project involving 27 colleagues who have undertaken an analysis of the global discussion on RBOs and the foundation of RBOs in Canada, USA, Great Britain, Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Thailand, and Australia. Drawing on Ostrom's institutional analysis and development framework, we first present a fine-grained analysis of the institutional architecture of these RBOs, which enables us to distinguish between autonomous, coordinating, partnership, and agency type RBOs. Second, we unravel the main controversies over this architecture by focusing on the key actors involved in either promoting or hindering RBO formation, globally and at the national level. Third, we summarize how the performance of RBOs can be evaluated in terms of coordination, accountability, legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness. Finally, we discuss the relationship between institutional design and performance. The main findings are: (1) the foundation of RBOs is not a neutral process but rather a highly political one, (2) the foundation of RBOs creates complex accountability relationships, and (3) institutional interplay, the capacity to generate financial resources, and a minimum degree of institutional stability are crucial to the successes of RBOs in realizing coordination and environmental effectiveness. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T23:17:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-005d89dd33ba4a9696c2fe6708f0d789 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1708-3087 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T23:17:17Z |
| publishDate | 2017-06-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-005d89dd33ba4a9696c2fe6708f0d7892022-12-21T21:28:59ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872017-06-012224110.5751/ES-09388-2202419388The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizationsSander Meijerink0Dave Huitema1Institute for Management Research, Radboud UniversityVU University AmsterdamOne of the prescriptions for adaptive comanagement of social-ecological systems is to follow a bioregional approach. In water resources management, experience has been gained with a bioregional approach by the foundation of river basin organizations (RBOs). Here, we summarize the results of a research project involving 27 colleagues who have undertaken an analysis of the global discussion on RBOs and the foundation of RBOs in Canada, USA, Great Britain, Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Thailand, and Australia. Drawing on Ostrom's institutional analysis and development framework, we first present a fine-grained analysis of the institutional architecture of these RBOs, which enables us to distinguish between autonomous, coordinating, partnership, and agency type RBOs. Second, we unravel the main controversies over this architecture by focusing on the key actors involved in either promoting or hindering RBO formation, globally and at the national level. Third, we summarize how the performance of RBOs can be evaluated in terms of coordination, accountability, legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness. Finally, we discuss the relationship between institutional design and performance. The main findings are: (1) the foundation of RBOs is not a neutral process but rather a highly political one, (2) the foundation of RBOs creates complex accountability relationships, and (3) institutional interplay, the capacity to generate financial resources, and a minimum degree of institutional stability are crucial to the successes of RBOs in realizing coordination and environmental effectiveness.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art41/accountabilitybioregional approachinstitutional analysisinstitutional interplayriver basin organizations |
| spellingShingle | Sander Meijerink Dave Huitema The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations Ecology and Society accountability bioregional approach institutional analysis institutional interplay river basin organizations |
| title | The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations |
| title_full | The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations |
| title_fullStr | The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations |
| title_full_unstemmed | The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations |
| title_short | The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations |
| title_sort | institutional design politics and effects of a bioregional approach observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations |
| topic | accountability bioregional approach institutional analysis institutional interplay river basin organizations |
| url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art41/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sandermeijerink theinstitutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations AT davehuitema theinstitutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations AT sandermeijerink institutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations AT davehuitema institutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations |