The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms

Even the highest courts are under pressure to perform effectively and efficiently. In some instances, the pressure comes from supervisory and elected authorities, such as parliaments, which demand information regarding judicial output. In Switzerland a decision has been made by the Parliament to app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreas Lienhard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Association for Court Administration 2008-10-01
Series:International Journal for Court Administration
Online Access:https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/102
_version_ 1818207854929117184
author Andreas Lienhard
author_facet Andreas Lienhard
author_sort Andreas Lienhard
collection DOAJ
description Even the highest courts are under pressure to perform effectively and efficiently. In some instances, the pressure comes from supervisory and elected authorities, such as parliaments, which demand information regarding judicial output. In Switzerland a decision has been made by the Parliament to apply “steering instruments”, which were introduced as part of general administrative reforms. These procedures also include mechanisms for “controlling” 2 judicial activity. In this article, we examine reforms relating to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court , and the compatibility of those reforms with separation of powers principles.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:35:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0060a24dd07d43ec87611aeda9ea76cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2156-7964
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:35:33Z
publishDate 2008-10-01
publisher International Association for Court Administration
record_format Article
series International Journal for Court Administration
spelling doaj.art-0060a24dd07d43ec87611aeda9ea76cb2022-12-22T00:37:58ZengInternational Association for Court AdministrationInternational Journal for Court Administration2156-79642008-10-0112435510.18352/ijca.10298The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management MechanismsAndreas LienhardEven the highest courts are under pressure to perform effectively and efficiently. In some instances, the pressure comes from supervisory and elected authorities, such as parliaments, which demand information regarding judicial output. In Switzerland a decision has been made by the Parliament to apply “steering instruments”, which were introduced as part of general administrative reforms. These procedures also include mechanisms for “controlling” 2 judicial activity. In this article, we examine reforms relating to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court , and the compatibility of those reforms with separation of powers principles.https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/102
spellingShingle Andreas Lienhard
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms
International Journal for Court Administration
title The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms
title_full The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms
title_fullStr The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms
title_short The Swiss Federal Supreme Court: A Constitutional Assessment of Control and Management Mechanisms
title_sort swiss federal supreme court a constitutional assessment of control and management mechanisms
url https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/102
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaslienhard theswissfederalsupremecourtaconstitutionalassessmentofcontrolandmanagementmechanisms
AT andreaslienhard swissfederalsupremecourtaconstitutionalassessmentofcontrolandmanagementmechanisms