Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions
The authors of this paper analyse administrative adjudication process brought in by Amendments to the Administrative Dispute Act of 2012. Namely, when the new Administrative Dispute act was brought in and enacted at the beginning of 2012, meant that for the first time in Croatia that administrative...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/177178 |
| _version_ | 1797421575124811776 |
|---|---|
| author | Marko Šikić Frane Staničić |
| author_facet | Marko Šikić Frane Staničić |
| author_sort | Marko Šikić |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The authors of this paper analyse administrative adjudication process brought in by Amendments to the Administrative Dispute Act of 2012. Namely, when the new Administrative Dispute act was brought in and enacted at the beginning of 2012, meant that for the first time in Croatia that administrative dispute, which was regulated in the law by cases, could be resolved by an individual judge. Reforms from the end of 2012 allowed a system in which administrative disputes before first instance administrative courts could be resolved by an individual judge. The authors of this paper firstly show the tradition of regulating the composition of the court in administrative dispute in Croatia in the 19th century.
This paper then provides an extensive comparative research into the composition oft he court in European countries which organised specialised administrative courts. They also pointed out the system of regulating the composition of the court in administrative dispute which enabled disputes to be resolved by an practically unknown individual judge. The authors of this paper demonstrate that this was an unnecessary and potentially dangerous reform with negative consequences in the administrative adjudication process concerning the extent and quality of dispute litigants' rights. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T07:19:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0064c4d14cfc42feb7e180c616a1c9a6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0584-9063 1847-0459 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T07:19:30Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu |
| spelling | doaj.art-0064c4d14cfc42feb7e180c616a1c9a62023-12-03T07:41:26ZengPravni fakultet Sveučilišta u SplituZbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu0584-90631847-04592014-01-01512363391Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisionsMarko ŠikićFrane StaničićThe authors of this paper analyse administrative adjudication process brought in by Amendments to the Administrative Dispute Act of 2012. Namely, when the new Administrative Dispute act was brought in and enacted at the beginning of 2012, meant that for the first time in Croatia that administrative dispute, which was regulated in the law by cases, could be resolved by an individual judge. Reforms from the end of 2012 allowed a system in which administrative disputes before first instance administrative courts could be resolved by an individual judge. The authors of this paper firstly show the tradition of regulating the composition of the court in administrative dispute in Croatia in the 19th century. This paper then provides an extensive comparative research into the composition oft he court in European countries which organised specialised administrative courts. They also pointed out the system of regulating the composition of the court in administrative dispute which enabled disputes to be resolved by an practically unknown individual judge. The authors of this paper demonstrate that this was an unnecessary and potentially dangerous reform with negative consequences in the administrative adjudication process concerning the extent and quality of dispute litigants' rights.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/177178Administrative Dispute Actreformcourt compositioncouncilindividual judge |
| spellingShingle | Marko Šikić Frane Staničić Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu Administrative Dispute Act reform court composition council individual judge |
| title | Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions |
| title_full | Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions |
| title_fullStr | Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions |
| title_short | Composition of Courts in Administrative Disputes – with particular reference to individual judges’ decisions |
| title_sort | composition of courts in administrative disputes with particular reference to individual judges decisions |
| topic | Administrative Dispute Act reform court composition council individual judge |
| url | http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/177178 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT markosikic compositionofcourtsinadministrativedisputeswithparticularreferencetoindividualjudgesdecisions AT franestanicic compositionofcourtsinadministrativedisputeswithparticularreferencetoindividualjudgesdecisions |