Yersiniosis in New Zealand

The rate of yersiniosis in New Zealand (NZ) is high compared with other developed countries, and rates have been increasing over recent years. Typically, >99% of human cases in NZ are attributed to <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i> (YE), although in 2014, a large outbreak of 220 cases wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucia Rivas, Hugo Strydom, Shevaun Paine, Jing Wang, Jackie Wright
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/2/191
_version_ 1797411871249137664
author Lucia Rivas
Hugo Strydom
Shevaun Paine
Jing Wang
Jackie Wright
author_facet Lucia Rivas
Hugo Strydom
Shevaun Paine
Jing Wang
Jackie Wright
author_sort Lucia Rivas
collection DOAJ
description The rate of yersiniosis in New Zealand (NZ) is high compared with other developed countries, and rates have been increasing over recent years. Typically, >99% of human cases in NZ are attributed to <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i> (YE), although in 2014, a large outbreak of 220 cases was caused by <i>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</i>. Up until 2012, the most common NZ strain was YE biotype 4. The emergent strain since this time is YE biotype 2/3 serotype O:9. The pathogenic potential of some YE biotypes remains unclear. Most human cases of yersiniosis are considered sporadic without an identifiable source. Key restrictions in previous investigations included insufficient sensitivity for the isolation of <i>Yersinia</i> spp. from foods, although foodborne transmission is the most likely route of infection. In NZ, YE has been isolated from a variety of sick and healthy domestic and farm animals but the pathways from zoonotic reservoir to human remain unproven. Whole-genome sequencing provides unprecedented discriminatory power for typing <i>Yersinia</i> and is now being applied to NZ epidemiological investigations. A “One-Health” approach is necessary to elucidate the routes of transmission of <i>Yersinia</i> and consequently inform targeted interventions for the prevention and management of yersiniosis in NZ
first_indexed 2024-03-09T04:52:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00678776c7fd480c9993b921cc5a970e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T04:52:32Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj.art-00678776c7fd480c9993b921cc5a970e2023-12-03T13:09:06ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172021-02-0110219110.3390/pathogens10020191Yersiniosis in New ZealandLucia Rivas0Hugo Strydom1Shevaun Paine2Jing Wang3Jackie Wright4Christchurch Science Centre, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Ilam, Christchurch 8041, New ZealandNational Centre for Biosecurity and Infectious Disease, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Upper Hutt, Wellington 5018, New ZealandKenepuru Science Centre, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Porirua, Wellington 5022, New ZealandKenepuru Science Centre, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Porirua, Wellington 5022, New ZealandNational Centre for Biosecurity and Infectious Disease, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Upper Hutt, Wellington 5018, New ZealandThe rate of yersiniosis in New Zealand (NZ) is high compared with other developed countries, and rates have been increasing over recent years. Typically, >99% of human cases in NZ are attributed to <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i> (YE), although in 2014, a large outbreak of 220 cases was caused by <i>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</i>. Up until 2012, the most common NZ strain was YE biotype 4. The emergent strain since this time is YE biotype 2/3 serotype O:9. The pathogenic potential of some YE biotypes remains unclear. Most human cases of yersiniosis are considered sporadic without an identifiable source. Key restrictions in previous investigations included insufficient sensitivity for the isolation of <i>Yersinia</i> spp. from foods, although foodborne transmission is the most likely route of infection. In NZ, YE has been isolated from a variety of sick and healthy domestic and farm animals but the pathways from zoonotic reservoir to human remain unproven. Whole-genome sequencing provides unprecedented discriminatory power for typing <i>Yersinia</i> and is now being applied to NZ epidemiological investigations. A “One-Health” approach is necessary to elucidate the routes of transmission of <i>Yersinia</i> and consequently inform targeted interventions for the prevention and management of yersiniosis in NZhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/2/191<i>Yersinia</i>yersiniosis<i>enterocolitica</i><i>pseudotuberculosis</i>foodborneNew Zealand
spellingShingle Lucia Rivas
Hugo Strydom
Shevaun Paine
Jing Wang
Jackie Wright
Yersiniosis in New Zealand
Pathogens
<i>Yersinia</i>
yersiniosis
<i>enterocolitica</i>
<i>pseudotuberculosis</i>
foodborne
New Zealand
title Yersiniosis in New Zealand
title_full Yersiniosis in New Zealand
title_fullStr Yersiniosis in New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Yersiniosis in New Zealand
title_short Yersiniosis in New Zealand
title_sort yersiniosis in new zealand
topic <i>Yersinia</i>
yersiniosis
<i>enterocolitica</i>
<i>pseudotuberculosis</i>
foodborne
New Zealand
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/2/191
work_keys_str_mv AT luciarivas yersiniosisinnewzealand
AT hugostrydom yersiniosisinnewzealand
AT shevaunpaine yersiniosisinnewzealand
AT jingwang yersiniosisinnewzealand
AT jackiewright yersiniosisinnewzealand