Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa.
Urine microscopy is the standard diagnostic method for urogenital S. haematobium infection. However, this may lead to under-diagnosis of urogenital schistosomiasis, as the disease may present itself with genital symptoms in the absence of ova in the urine. Currently there is no single reliable and a...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5815575?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819148152105598976 |
|---|---|
| author | Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-Arachchige Sigve Holmen Artemis Koukounari Elisabeth Kleppa Pavitra Pillay Motshedisi Sebitloane Patricia Ndhlovu Lisette van Lieshout Birgitte Jyding Vennervald Svein Gunnar Gundersen Myra Taylor Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland |
| author_facet | Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-Arachchige Sigve Holmen Artemis Koukounari Elisabeth Kleppa Pavitra Pillay Motshedisi Sebitloane Patricia Ndhlovu Lisette van Lieshout Birgitte Jyding Vennervald Svein Gunnar Gundersen Myra Taylor Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland |
| author_sort | Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-Arachchige |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Urine microscopy is the standard diagnostic method for urogenital S. haematobium infection. However, this may lead to under-diagnosis of urogenital schistosomiasis, as the disease may present itself with genital symptoms in the absence of ova in the urine. Currently there is no single reliable and affordable diagnostic method to diagnose the full spectrum of urogenital S. haematobium infection. In this study we explore the classic indicators in the diagnosis of urogenital S. haematobium infection, with focus on young women.In a cross-sectional study of 1237 sexually active young women in rural South Africa, we assessed four diagnostic indicators of urogenital S. haematobium infection: microscopy of urine, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of cervicovaginal lavage (CVL), urogenital symptoms, and sandy patches detected clinically in combination with computerised image analysis of photocolposcopic images. We estimated the accuracy of these diagnostic indicators through the following analyses: 1) cross tabulation (assumed empirical gold standard) of the tests against the combined findings of sandy patches and/or computerized image analysis and 2) a latent class model of the four indicators without assuming any gold standard.The empirical approach showed that urine microscopy had a sensitivity of 34.7% and specificity of 75.2% while the latent class analysis approach (LCA) suggested a sensitivity of 81.0% and specificity of 85.6%. The empirical approach and LCA showed that Schistosoma PCR in CVL had low sensitivity (14.1% and 52.4%, respectively) and high specificity (93.0% and 98.0, respectively). Using LCA, the presence of sandy patches showed a sensitivity of 81.6 and specificity of 42.4%. The empirical approach and LCA showed that urogenital symptoms had a high sensitivity (89.4% and 100.0%, respectively), whereas specificity was low (10.6% and 12.3%, respectively).All the diagnostic indicators used in the study had limited accuracy. Using urine microscopy or Schistosoma PCR in CVL would only confirm a fraction of the sandy patches found by colposcopic examination. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:41:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0090f00a519d4e51baef7cc4f0f7cc91 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:41:10Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-0090f00a519d4e51baef7cc4f0f7cc912022-12-21T18:23:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019145910.1371/journal.pone.0191459Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa.Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-ArachchigeSigve HolmenArtemis KoukounariElisabeth KleppaPavitra PillayMotshedisi SebitloanePatricia NdhlovuLisette van LieshoutBirgitte Jyding VennervaldSvein Gunnar GundersenMyra TaylorEyrun Floerecke KjetlandUrine microscopy is the standard diagnostic method for urogenital S. haematobium infection. However, this may lead to under-diagnosis of urogenital schistosomiasis, as the disease may present itself with genital symptoms in the absence of ova in the urine. Currently there is no single reliable and affordable diagnostic method to diagnose the full spectrum of urogenital S. haematobium infection. In this study we explore the classic indicators in the diagnosis of urogenital S. haematobium infection, with focus on young women.In a cross-sectional study of 1237 sexually active young women in rural South Africa, we assessed four diagnostic indicators of urogenital S. haematobium infection: microscopy of urine, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of cervicovaginal lavage (CVL), urogenital symptoms, and sandy patches detected clinically in combination with computerised image analysis of photocolposcopic images. We estimated the accuracy of these diagnostic indicators through the following analyses: 1) cross tabulation (assumed empirical gold standard) of the tests against the combined findings of sandy patches and/or computerized image analysis and 2) a latent class model of the four indicators without assuming any gold standard.The empirical approach showed that urine microscopy had a sensitivity of 34.7% and specificity of 75.2% while the latent class analysis approach (LCA) suggested a sensitivity of 81.0% and specificity of 85.6%. The empirical approach and LCA showed that Schistosoma PCR in CVL had low sensitivity (14.1% and 52.4%, respectively) and high specificity (93.0% and 98.0, respectively). Using LCA, the presence of sandy patches showed a sensitivity of 81.6 and specificity of 42.4%. The empirical approach and LCA showed that urogenital symptoms had a high sensitivity (89.4% and 100.0%, respectively), whereas specificity was low (10.6% and 12.3%, respectively).All the diagnostic indicators used in the study had limited accuracy. Using urine microscopy or Schistosoma PCR in CVL would only confirm a fraction of the sandy patches found by colposcopic examination.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5815575?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-Arachchige Sigve Holmen Artemis Koukounari Elisabeth Kleppa Pavitra Pillay Motshedisi Sebitloane Patricia Ndhlovu Lisette van Lieshout Birgitte Jyding Vennervald Svein Gunnar Gundersen Myra Taylor Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa. PLoS ONE |
| title | Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa. |
| title_full | Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa. |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa. |
| title_short | Evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital Schistosoma haematobium infection in young women: A cross sectional study in rural South Africa. |
| title_sort | evaluating diagnostic indicators of urogenital schistosoma haematobium infection in young women a cross sectional study in rural south africa |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5815575?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hashininilushikagalappaththiarachchige evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT sigveholmen evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT artemiskoukounari evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT elisabethkleppa evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT pavitrapillay evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT motshedisisebitloane evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT patriciandhlovu evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT lisettevanlieshout evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT birgittejydingvennervald evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT sveingunnargundersen evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT myrataylor evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica AT eyrunfloereckekjetland evaluatingdiagnosticindicatorsofurogenitalschistosomahaematobiuminfectioninyoungwomenacrosssectionalstudyinruralsouthafrica |