Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score

Context: Preoperative severity of myelopathy, age, and duration of symptoms have been shown to be highly predictive of the outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM). The role of radiological parameters is still controversial. Aims: Define the prognostic factors in CCM and formulate a prognost...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rishi Anil Aggarwal, Sudhir Kumar Srivastava, Sunil Krishna Bhosale, Pradip Sharad Nemade
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2016;volume=7;issue=2;spage=82;epage=86;aulast=Aggarwal
_version_ 1818151700513423360
author Rishi Anil Aggarwal
Sudhir Kumar Srivastava
Sunil Krishna Bhosale
Pradip Sharad Nemade
author_facet Rishi Anil Aggarwal
Sudhir Kumar Srivastava
Sunil Krishna Bhosale
Pradip Sharad Nemade
author_sort Rishi Anil Aggarwal
collection DOAJ
description Context: Preoperative severity of myelopathy, age, and duration of symptoms have been shown to be highly predictive of the outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM). The role of radiological parameters is still controversial. Aims: Define the prognostic factors in CCM and formulate a prognostic score to predict the outcome following surgery in CCM. Settings and Design: Retrospective. Materials and Methods: This study included 78 consecutive patients with CCM treated surgically. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale was used to quantify severity of myelopathy at admission and at 12-month follow-up. The outcome was defined as "good" if the patient had mJOA score ≥16 and "poor" if the score was <16. Age, sex, duration of symptoms, comorbidities, intrinsic hand muscle wasting (IHMW), diagnosis, surgical technique, Torg ratio, instability on dynamic radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity changes were assessed. Statistics: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 20.0) was used for statistical analysis. The association was assessed amongst variables using logistic regression analysis. Parameters having a statistically significant correlation with the outcome were included in formulating a prognostic score. Results: Severity of myelopathy, IHMW, age, duration, diabetes, and instability on radiographs were predictive of the outcome with a P value <0.01. Genders, diagnosis, surgical procedure, Torg ratio, and intensity changes on MRI were not significantly related to the outcome. A 8-point scoring system was devised incorporating the significant clinicoradiological parameters, and it was found that nearly all patients (97.82%) with a score below 5 had good outcome and all patients (100%) with a score above 5 had poor outcome. The outcome is difficult to predict with a score of 5. Conclusions: Clinical parameters are better predictors of the outcome as compared to radiological findings, following surgery in CCM. A simple scoring system based on clinicoradiological parameters is suggested in this paper to predict the outcome following surgery in cases of CCM.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:43:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00958abaeb0f4af3a963a7cafe130653
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-8237
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:43:00Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
spelling doaj.art-00958abaeb0f4af3a963a7cafe1306532022-12-22T01:04:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372016-01-0172828610.4103/0974-8237.181828Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic scoreRishi Anil AggarwalSudhir Kumar SrivastavaSunil Krishna BhosalePradip Sharad NemadeContext: Preoperative severity of myelopathy, age, and duration of symptoms have been shown to be highly predictive of the outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM). The role of radiological parameters is still controversial. Aims: Define the prognostic factors in CCM and formulate a prognostic score to predict the outcome following surgery in CCM. Settings and Design: Retrospective. Materials and Methods: This study included 78 consecutive patients with CCM treated surgically. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale was used to quantify severity of myelopathy at admission and at 12-month follow-up. The outcome was defined as "good" if the patient had mJOA score ≥16 and "poor" if the score was <16. Age, sex, duration of symptoms, comorbidities, intrinsic hand muscle wasting (IHMW), diagnosis, surgical technique, Torg ratio, instability on dynamic radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity changes were assessed. Statistics: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 20.0) was used for statistical analysis. The association was assessed amongst variables using logistic regression analysis. Parameters having a statistically significant correlation with the outcome were included in formulating a prognostic score. Results: Severity of myelopathy, IHMW, age, duration, diabetes, and instability on radiographs were predictive of the outcome with a P value <0.01. Genders, diagnosis, surgical procedure, Torg ratio, and intensity changes on MRI were not significantly related to the outcome. A 8-point scoring system was devised incorporating the significant clinicoradiological parameters, and it was found that nearly all patients (97.82%) with a score below 5 had good outcome and all patients (100%) with a score above 5 had poor outcome. The outcome is difficult to predict with a score of 5. Conclusions: Clinical parameters are better predictors of the outcome as compared to radiological findings, following surgery in CCM. A simple scoring system based on clinicoradiological parameters is suggested in this paper to predict the outcome following surgery in cases of CCM.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2016;volume=7;issue=2;spage=82;epage=86;aulast=AggarwalCompressive cervical myelopathy (CCM)predictors of the outcomescoresurgical outcome
spellingShingle Rishi Anil Aggarwal
Sudhir Kumar Srivastava
Sunil Krishna Bhosale
Pradip Sharad Nemade
Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM)
predictors of the outcome
score
surgical outcome
title Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
title_full Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
title_fullStr Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
title_short Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
title_sort prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy a novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
topic Compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM)
predictors of the outcome
score
surgical outcome
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2016;volume=7;issue=2;spage=82;epage=86;aulast=Aggarwal
work_keys_str_mv AT rishianilaggarwal predictionofsurgicaloutcomeincompressivecervicalmyelopathyanovelclinicoradiologicalprognosticscore
AT sudhirkumarsrivastava predictionofsurgicaloutcomeincompressivecervicalmyelopathyanovelclinicoradiologicalprognosticscore
AT sunilkrishnabhosale predictionofsurgicaloutcomeincompressivecervicalmyelopathyanovelclinicoradiologicalprognosticscore
AT pradipsharadnemade predictionofsurgicaloutcomeincompressivecervicalmyelopathyanovelclinicoradiologicalprognosticscore