Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain

Abstract. Pain, by definition, is a subjective experience, and as such its presence has usually been based on a self-report. However, limitations of self-reports for pain diagnostics, particularly for legal and insurance purposes, has led some to consider a brain-imaging–based objective measure of p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen D. Davis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2016-10-01
Series:PAIN Reports
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000577
_version_ 1811306349552730112
author Karen D. Davis
author_facet Karen D. Davis
author_sort Karen D. Davis
collection DOAJ
description Abstract. Pain, by definition, is a subjective experience, and as such its presence has usually been based on a self-report. However, limitations of self-reports for pain diagnostics, particularly for legal and insurance purposes, has led some to consider a brain-imaging–based objective measure of pain. This review will provide an overview of (1) differences between pain and nociception, (2) intersubject variability in pain perception and the associated brain structures and functional circuits, and (3) capabilities and limitations of current brain-imaging technologies. I then discuss how these factors impact objective proxies of pain. Finally, the ethical, privacy, and legal implications of a brain-imaging–based objective measure of pain are considered as potential future technological developments necessary to create a so-called “painometer test.”
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:43:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00a76058cd054eb283ba7ba172aa7d35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2471-2531
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:43:58Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series PAIN Reports
spelling doaj.art-00a76058cd054eb283ba7ba172aa7d352022-12-22T02:53:46ZengWolters KluwerPAIN Reports2471-25312016-10-0114e57710.1097/PR9.0000000000000577201610000-00003Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose painKaren D. Davis0Department of Surgery and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto; Division of Brain, Imaging and Behaviour-Systems Neuroscience, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaAbstract. Pain, by definition, is a subjective experience, and as such its presence has usually been based on a self-report. However, limitations of self-reports for pain diagnostics, particularly for legal and insurance purposes, has led some to consider a brain-imaging–based objective measure of pain. This review will provide an overview of (1) differences between pain and nociception, (2) intersubject variability in pain perception and the associated brain structures and functional circuits, and (3) capabilities and limitations of current brain-imaging technologies. I then discuss how these factors impact objective proxies of pain. Finally, the ethical, privacy, and legal implications of a brain-imaging–based objective measure of pain are considered as potential future technological developments necessary to create a so-called “painometer test.”http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000577
spellingShingle Karen D. Davis
Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
PAIN Reports
title Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
title_full Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
title_fullStr Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
title_full_unstemmed Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
title_short Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
title_sort legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain
url http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000577
work_keys_str_mv AT karenddavis legalandethicalissuesofusingbrainimagingtodiagnosepain