Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy

A Christian approach to literature is easily confused with a theological approach. There are many dangers implicit in such an approach. Sallie McFague TeSelle says the following about theologians who presume to violate the bounds of both theology and literature by attempting literary criticism: “The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Haarhoff, A. L. Combrink
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Scriber Editorial Systems 1979-03-01
Series:Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Online Access:https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/1145
_version_ 1818453126308429824
author I. Haarhoff
A. L. Combrink
author_facet I. Haarhoff
A. L. Combrink
author_sort I. Haarhoff
collection DOAJ
description A Christian approach to literature is easily confused with a theological approach. There are many dangers implicit in such an approach. Sallie McFague TeSelle says the following about theologians who presume to violate the bounds of both theology and literature by attempting literary criticism: “There is no reason to suppose that those trained in theology, or philosophy for that matter, are likely to possess, what is essential to the practice of literary criticism, that ‘sensitiveness of the intelligence’ described by Matthew Arnold as equivalent to conscience in moral matters. A theological training seems to have a disabling effect and has subsequently to be struggled against when literary criticism is the concern.” (TeSelle 1966:4).
first_indexed 2024-12-14T21:34:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00b0fa2a9dde401ab6d21dc4b34222a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0023-270X
2304-8557
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-12-14T21:34:02Z
publishDate 1979-03-01
publisher Scriber Editorial Systems
record_format Article
series Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
spelling doaj.art-00b0fa2a9dde401ab6d21dc4b34222a62022-12-21T22:46:36ZafrScriber Editorial SystemsKoers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship0023-270X2304-85571979-03-0144610.4102/koers.v44i6.1145Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedyI. HaarhoffA. L. CombrinkA Christian approach to literature is easily confused with a theological approach. There are many dangers implicit in such an approach. Sallie McFague TeSelle says the following about theologians who presume to violate the bounds of both theology and literature by attempting literary criticism: “There is no reason to suppose that those trained in theology, or philosophy for that matter, are likely to possess, what is essential to the practice of literary criticism, that ‘sensitiveness of the intelligence’ described by Matthew Arnold as equivalent to conscience in moral matters. A theological training seems to have a disabling effect and has subsequently to be struggled against when literary criticism is the concern.” (TeSelle 1966:4).https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/1145
spellingShingle I. Haarhoff
A. L. Combrink
Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
title Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
title_full Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
title_fullStr Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
title_full_unstemmed Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
title_short Tragedy and the sovereignty of God: Christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
title_sort tragedy and the sovereignty of god christian literary criticism and the concept of tragedy
url https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/1145
work_keys_str_mv AT ihaarhoff tragedyandthesovereigntyofgodchristianliterarycriticismandtheconceptoftragedy
AT alcombrink tragedyandthesovereigntyofgodchristianliterarycriticismandtheconceptoftragedy