Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials

Good Participatory Practice (GPP) guidelines support and direct community engagement practices in biomedical HIV prevention trials, however no standardized metrics define the implementation and evaluation of these practices. Collaboratively, the Community Program staff of the HIV Vaccine Trials Netw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gail B. Broder, Jonathan P. Lucas, Jontraye Davis, Stephaun E. Wallace, Nandisile Luthuli, Kagisho Baepanye, Rhonda R. White, Marcus Bolton, Cheryl Blanchette, Michele P. Andrasik, Douglas S. Krakower
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7498108/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818412871928774656
author Gail B. Broder
Jonathan P. Lucas
Jontraye Davis
Stephaun E. Wallace
Nandisile Luthuli
Kagisho Baepanye
Rhonda R. White
Marcus Bolton
Cheryl Blanchette
Michele P. Andrasik
Douglas S. Krakower
author_facet Gail B. Broder
Jonathan P. Lucas
Jontraye Davis
Stephaun E. Wallace
Nandisile Luthuli
Kagisho Baepanye
Rhonda R. White
Marcus Bolton
Cheryl Blanchette
Michele P. Andrasik
Douglas S. Krakower
author_sort Gail B. Broder
collection DOAJ
description Good Participatory Practice (GPP) guidelines support and direct community engagement practices in biomedical HIV prevention trials, however no standardized metrics define the implementation and evaluation of these practices. Collaboratively, the Community Program staff of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) and the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) created a metric to describe, monitor, and evaluate one component of GPP, recruitment practices, in two HIV monoclonal Antibody Mediated Prevention (AMP) clinical trials, HVTN 703/HPTN 081 and HVTN 704/HPTN 085. Through consultation with community representatives from each clinical research site (hereafter “site(s)”), who made up the study Community Working Groups, recruitment strategy descriptors were developed for both trials to characterize responses to “How did you hear about the AMP study?” The Community Working Groups also helped to define and establish time points that were selected to allow comparisons across sites. Data were collected by 43 of 46 clinical research sites from January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018. All 43 sites used multiple recruitment strategies successfully, but strategies varied by region. Globally, referrals was the most efficient and effective recruitment strategy as evidenced by the screening: enrollment ratio of 2.2:1 in Africa, and 2.1:1 in the Americas/Switzerland. Print materials were also valuable globally (3:1 Africa, 4.2:1 Americas/Switzerland). In Africa, in-person outreach was also quite effective (2.3:1) and led to the most enrollments (748 of 1186, 63%). In the Americas/Switzerland, outreach was also effective (2.6:1), but internet use resulted in the most screens (1893 of 4275, 44%) and enrollments (677 of 1531, 44%), compared to 12 of 2887 (0.4%) and 2 of 1204 (0.1%) in Africa, respectively. Standardized metrics and data collection aid meaningful comparisons of optimal community engagement methods for trial enrollment. Internet strategies had better success in the Americas/Switzerland than in sub-Saharan African countries. Data are essential in outreach staff efforts to improve screening-to-enrollment ratios. Because the effectiveness of recruitment strategies varies by region, it is critical that clinical research sites tailor community engagement and recruitment strategies to their local environment, and that they are supported with resources enabling use of a range of approaches.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T10:54:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00c9ab32774a46de94aa81081796d806
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T10:54:12Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-00c9ab32774a46de94aa81081796d8062022-12-21T23:05:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trialsGail B. BroderJonathan P. LucasJontraye DavisStephaun E. WallaceNandisile LuthuliKagisho BaepanyeRhonda R. WhiteMarcus BoltonCheryl BlanchetteMichele P. AndrasikDouglas S. KrakowerGood Participatory Practice (GPP) guidelines support and direct community engagement practices in biomedical HIV prevention trials, however no standardized metrics define the implementation and evaluation of these practices. Collaboratively, the Community Program staff of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) and the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) created a metric to describe, monitor, and evaluate one component of GPP, recruitment practices, in two HIV monoclonal Antibody Mediated Prevention (AMP) clinical trials, HVTN 703/HPTN 081 and HVTN 704/HPTN 085. Through consultation with community representatives from each clinical research site (hereafter “site(s)”), who made up the study Community Working Groups, recruitment strategy descriptors were developed for both trials to characterize responses to “How did you hear about the AMP study?” The Community Working Groups also helped to define and establish time points that were selected to allow comparisons across sites. Data were collected by 43 of 46 clinical research sites from January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018. All 43 sites used multiple recruitment strategies successfully, but strategies varied by region. Globally, referrals was the most efficient and effective recruitment strategy as evidenced by the screening: enrollment ratio of 2.2:1 in Africa, and 2.1:1 in the Americas/Switzerland. Print materials were also valuable globally (3:1 Africa, 4.2:1 Americas/Switzerland). In Africa, in-person outreach was also quite effective (2.3:1) and led to the most enrollments (748 of 1186, 63%). In the Americas/Switzerland, outreach was also effective (2.6:1), but internet use resulted in the most screens (1893 of 4275, 44%) and enrollments (677 of 1531, 44%), compared to 12 of 2887 (0.4%) and 2 of 1204 (0.1%) in Africa, respectively. Standardized metrics and data collection aid meaningful comparisons of optimal community engagement methods for trial enrollment. Internet strategies had better success in the Americas/Switzerland than in sub-Saharan African countries. Data are essential in outreach staff efforts to improve screening-to-enrollment ratios. Because the effectiveness of recruitment strategies varies by region, it is critical that clinical research sites tailor community engagement and recruitment strategies to their local environment, and that they are supported with resources enabling use of a range of approaches.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7498108/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Gail B. Broder
Jonathan P. Lucas
Jontraye Davis
Stephaun E. Wallace
Nandisile Luthuli
Kagisho Baepanye
Rhonda R. White
Marcus Bolton
Cheryl Blanchette
Michele P. Andrasik
Douglas S. Krakower
Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials
PLoS ONE
title Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials
title_full Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials
title_fullStr Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials
title_full_unstemmed Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials
title_short Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials
title_sort standardized metrics can reveal region specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in hiv prevention trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7498108/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT gailbbroder standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT jonathanplucas standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT jontrayedavis standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT stephaunewallace standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT nandisileluthuli standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT kagishobaepanye standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT rhondarwhite standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT marcusbolton standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT cherylblanchette standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT michelepandrasik standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials
AT douglasskrakower standardizedmetricscanrevealregionspecificopportunitiesincommunityengagementtoaidrecruitmentinhivpreventiontrials