Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.

Islet transplantation to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D) has shown varied long-term success, due in part to insufficient blood supply to maintain the islets. In the current study, collagen and collagen:chitosan (10:1) hydrogels, +/- circulating angiogenic cells (CACs), were compared for their ability to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanne E McBane, Branka Vulesevic, Donna T Padavan, Kimberly A McEwan, Gregory S Korbutt, Erik J Suuronen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3799615?pdf=render
_version_ 1819315496863924224
author Joanne E McBane
Branka Vulesevic
Donna T Padavan
Kimberly A McEwan
Gregory S Korbutt
Erik J Suuronen
author_facet Joanne E McBane
Branka Vulesevic
Donna T Padavan
Kimberly A McEwan
Gregory S Korbutt
Erik J Suuronen
author_sort Joanne E McBane
collection DOAJ
description Islet transplantation to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D) has shown varied long-term success, due in part to insufficient blood supply to maintain the islets. In the current study, collagen and collagen:chitosan (10:1) hydrogels, +/- circulating angiogenic cells (CACs), were compared for their ability to produce a pro-angiogenic environment in a streptozotocin-induced mouse model of T1D. Initial characterization showed that collagen-chitosan gels were mechanically stronger than the collagen gels (0.7 kPa vs. 0.4 kPa elastic modulus, respectively), had more cross-links (9.2 vs. 7.4/µm(2)), and were degraded more slowly by collagenase. After gelation with CACs, live/dead staining showed greater CAC viability in the collagen-chitosan gels after 18 h compared to collagen (79% vs. 69%). In vivo, collagen-chitosan gels, subcutaneously implanted for up to 6 weeks in a T1D mouse, showed increased levels of pro-angiogenic cytokines over time. By 6 weeks, anti-islet cytokine levels were decreased in all matrix formulations ± CACs. The 6-week implants demonstrated increased expression of VCAM-1 in collagen-chitosan implants. Despite this, infiltrating vWF(+) and CXCR4(+) angiogenic cell numbers were not different between the implant types, which may be due to a delayed and reduced cytokine response in a T1D versus non-diabetic setting. The mechanical, degradation and cytokine data all suggest that the collagen-chitosan gel may be a suitable candidate for use as a pro-angiogenic ectopic islet transplant site.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T10:01:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00dd36c481aa4eb584fb84d4779cc63b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T10:01:02Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-00dd36c481aa4eb584fb84d4779cc63b2022-12-21T17:01:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7753810.1371/journal.pone.0077538Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.Joanne E McBaneBranka VulesevicDonna T PadavanKimberly A McEwanGregory S KorbuttErik J SuuronenIslet transplantation to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D) has shown varied long-term success, due in part to insufficient blood supply to maintain the islets. In the current study, collagen and collagen:chitosan (10:1) hydrogels, +/- circulating angiogenic cells (CACs), were compared for their ability to produce a pro-angiogenic environment in a streptozotocin-induced mouse model of T1D. Initial characterization showed that collagen-chitosan gels were mechanically stronger than the collagen gels (0.7 kPa vs. 0.4 kPa elastic modulus, respectively), had more cross-links (9.2 vs. 7.4/µm(2)), and were degraded more slowly by collagenase. After gelation with CACs, live/dead staining showed greater CAC viability in the collagen-chitosan gels after 18 h compared to collagen (79% vs. 69%). In vivo, collagen-chitosan gels, subcutaneously implanted for up to 6 weeks in a T1D mouse, showed increased levels of pro-angiogenic cytokines over time. By 6 weeks, anti-islet cytokine levels were decreased in all matrix formulations ± CACs. The 6-week implants demonstrated increased expression of VCAM-1 in collagen-chitosan implants. Despite this, infiltrating vWF(+) and CXCR4(+) angiogenic cell numbers were not different between the implant types, which may be due to a delayed and reduced cytokine response in a T1D versus non-diabetic setting. The mechanical, degradation and cytokine data all suggest that the collagen-chitosan gel may be a suitable candidate for use as a pro-angiogenic ectopic islet transplant site.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3799615?pdf=render
spellingShingle Joanne E McBane
Branka Vulesevic
Donna T Padavan
Kimberly A McEwan
Gregory S Korbutt
Erik J Suuronen
Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.
PLoS ONE
title Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.
title_full Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.
title_fullStr Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.
title_short Evaluation of a collagen-chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro-angiogenic site for islet transplantation.
title_sort evaluation of a collagen chitosan hydrogel for potential use as a pro angiogenic site for islet transplantation
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3799615?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT joanneemcbane evaluationofacollagenchitosanhydrogelforpotentialuseasaproangiogenicsiteforislettransplantation
AT brankavulesevic evaluationofacollagenchitosanhydrogelforpotentialuseasaproangiogenicsiteforislettransplantation
AT donnatpadavan evaluationofacollagenchitosanhydrogelforpotentialuseasaproangiogenicsiteforislettransplantation
AT kimberlyamcewan evaluationofacollagenchitosanhydrogelforpotentialuseasaproangiogenicsiteforislettransplantation
AT gregoryskorbutt evaluationofacollagenchitosanhydrogelforpotentialuseasaproangiogenicsiteforislettransplantation
AT erikjsuuronen evaluationofacollagenchitosanhydrogelforpotentialuseasaproangiogenicsiteforislettransplantation