Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer screening modalities and guidelines continue to evolve and are increasingly based on risk factors, including genetic risk and a personal or family history of cancer. Here, we review genetic testing of high-penetrance hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ava Willoughby, Paul R. Andreassen, Amanda Ewart Toland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/9/1/15
_version_ 1797758886284886016
author Ava Willoughby
Paul R. Andreassen
Amanda Ewart Toland
author_facet Ava Willoughby
Paul R. Andreassen
Amanda Ewart Toland
author_sort Ava Willoughby
collection DOAJ
description Breast cancer screening modalities and guidelines continue to evolve and are increasingly based on risk factors, including genetic risk and a personal or family history of cancer. Here, we review genetic testing of high-penetrance hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, for the purpose of identifying high-risk individuals who would benefit from earlier screening and more sensitive methods such as magnetic resonance imaging. We also consider risk-based screening in the general population, including whether every woman should be genetically tested for high-risk genes and the potential use of polygenic risk scores. In addition to enabling early detection, the results of genetic screens of breast cancer susceptibility genes can be utilized to guide decision-making about when to elect prophylactic surgeries that reduce cancer risk and the choice of therapeutic options. Variants of uncertain significance, especially missense variants, are being identified during panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A finding of a variant of uncertain significance does not provide a basis for increased cancer surveillance or prophylactic procedures. Given that variant classification is often challenging, we also consider the role of multifactorial statistical analyses by large consortia and functional tests for this purpose.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:36:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00ddb81014c74acc8cf0ad7524d83126
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:36:28Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-00ddb81014c74acc8cf0ad7524d831262023-08-02T07:56:53ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262019-03-01911510.3390/jpm9010015jpm9010015Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast CancerAva Willoughby0Paul R. Andreassen1Amanda Ewart Toland2Departments of Cancer Biology and Genetics and Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USADivision of Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USADepartments of Cancer Biology and Genetics and Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USABreast cancer screening modalities and guidelines continue to evolve and are increasingly based on risk factors, including genetic risk and a personal or family history of cancer. Here, we review genetic testing of high-penetrance hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, for the purpose of identifying high-risk individuals who would benefit from earlier screening and more sensitive methods such as magnetic resonance imaging. We also consider risk-based screening in the general population, including whether every woman should be genetically tested for high-risk genes and the potential use of polygenic risk scores. In addition to enabling early detection, the results of genetic screens of breast cancer susceptibility genes can be utilized to guide decision-making about when to elect prophylactic surgeries that reduce cancer risk and the choice of therapeutic options. Variants of uncertain significance, especially missense variants, are being identified during panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A finding of a variant of uncertain significance does not provide a basis for increased cancer surveillance or prophylactic procedures. Given that variant classification is often challenging, we also consider the role of multifactorial statistical analyses by large consortia and functional tests for this purpose.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/9/1/15Risk stratificationrisk modelspolygenic risk scorehereditary breast and ovarian cancerbreast cancer screeninggenetic riskgenetic testingBRCA1BRCA2
spellingShingle Ava Willoughby
Paul R. Andreassen
Amanda Ewart Toland
Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Risk stratification
risk models
polygenic risk score
hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
breast cancer screening
genetic risk
genetic testing
BRCA1
BRCA2
title Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
title_full Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
title_short Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
title_sort genetic testing to guide risk stratified screens for breast cancer
topic Risk stratification
risk models
polygenic risk score
hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
breast cancer screening
genetic risk
genetic testing
BRCA1
BRCA2
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/9/1/15
work_keys_str_mv AT avawilloughby genetictestingtoguideriskstratifiedscreensforbreastcancer
AT paulrandreassen genetictestingtoguideriskstratifiedscreensforbreastcancer
AT amandaewarttoland genetictestingtoguideriskstratifiedscreensforbreastcancer