Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War

Backround. Against the background of the conflict between the director of the Kuibyshev Aviation Institute F.I. Stebikhov and Associate Professor S.S. Mezhevikin, the article examines the role of informal connections in the Soviet academic circles during the Second world war. The purpose of the arti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sergey D. Chebotarev, Mikhail M. Leonov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penza State University Publishing House 2023-11-01
Series:Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион: Гуманитарные науки
Subjects:
_version_ 1827778278422740992
author Sergey D. Chebotarev
Mikhail M. Leonov
author_facet Sergey D. Chebotarev
Mikhail M. Leonov
author_sort Sergey D. Chebotarev
collection DOAJ
description Backround. Against the background of the conflict between the director of the Kuibyshev Aviation Institute F.I. Stebikhov and Associate Professor S.S. Mezhevikin, the article examines the role of informal connections in the Soviet academic circles during the Second world war. The purpose of the article is to study the activities of the “most active members of the institute” – the dominant group that controlled the process of distribution of scarce goods and took part in solving the most significant issues facing the team. Materials and methods. The basis of the study was unpublished archival documents located in the funds of the Samara Regional State Archive of Socio-Political History and the Samara National Research University. The methodological basis of the study is the principles of historicism, objectivity and consistency. Results. The phases of the conflict are consistently studied, starting from the sending of the teachers to public works and ending with the dismissal. Strategies of behavior of the participants were identified, including complaints to officials and letters to the editorial offices of newspapers. Conclusions. In addition to the formal hierarchy, the institute had a system of informal relations. The most active members of the institute, which had weight and authority in the eyes of the staff, formed a common position on a number of significant issues and largely determined the attitude towards each member of the team. The authors come to the conclusion that it was the most active members of the institute that played a decisive role in the development and resolution of the conflict.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:30:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-00e4addd9a4545619889bfb92b992e58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-3024
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:30:45Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Penza State University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион: Гуманитарные науки
spelling doaj.art-00e4addd9a4545619889bfb92b992e582023-10-31T08:19:54ZengPenza State University Publishing HouseИзвестия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион: Гуманитарные науки2072-30242023-11-01310.21685/2072-3024-2023-3-6Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War Sergey D. Chebotarev0Mikhail M. Leonov1Samara National Research UniversitySamara National Research UniversityBackround. Against the background of the conflict between the director of the Kuibyshev Aviation Institute F.I. Stebikhov and Associate Professor S.S. Mezhevikin, the article examines the role of informal connections in the Soviet academic circles during the Second world war. The purpose of the article is to study the activities of the “most active members of the institute” – the dominant group that controlled the process of distribution of scarce goods and took part in solving the most significant issues facing the team. Materials and methods. The basis of the study was unpublished archival documents located in the funds of the Samara Regional State Archive of Socio-Political History and the Samara National Research University. The methodological basis of the study is the principles of historicism, objectivity and consistency. Results. The phases of the conflict are consistently studied, starting from the sending of the teachers to public works and ending with the dismissal. Strategies of behavior of the participants were identified, including complaints to officials and letters to the editorial offices of newspapers. Conclusions. In addition to the formal hierarchy, the institute had a system of informal relations. The most active members of the institute, which had weight and authority in the eyes of the staff, formed a common position on a number of significant issues and largely determined the attitude towards each member of the team. The authors come to the conclusion that it was the most active members of the institute that played a decisive role in the development and resolution of the conflict.informal connectionsclannishnessinstitutioncomplaintconflictsupplyscientistbureaucracy
spellingShingle Sergey D. Chebotarev
Mikhail M. Leonov
Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War
Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион: Гуманитарные науки
informal connections
clannishness
institution
complaint
conflict
supply
scientist
bureaucracy
title Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War
title_full Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War
title_fullStr Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War
title_full_unstemmed Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War
title_short Mezhevikin’s case. Conflict in the academic environment during the Great Patriotic War
title_sort mezhevikin s case conflict in the academic environment during the great patriotic war
topic informal connections
clannishness
institution
complaint
conflict
supply
scientist
bureaucracy
work_keys_str_mv AT sergeydchebotarev mezhevikinscaseconflictintheacademicenvironmentduringthegreatpatrioticwar
AT mikhailmleonov mezhevikinscaseconflictintheacademicenvironmentduringthegreatpatrioticwar