Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash

Subgrade soil plays an important role in road structural design; therefore, poor subgrade soil may cause insufficient support for the pavement and may reduce its life. The poor properties subgrade soil should be replaced with a strong soil to improve the pavements properties and this cost a lot. Con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shalaw Abdullah Saleh, Salar Khudhur Hussein, Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tishk International University 2020-12-01
Series:Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-6-issue-2-article-5/
_version_ 1797726900861272064
author Shalaw Abdullah Saleh
Salar Khudhur Hussein
Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw
author_facet Shalaw Abdullah Saleh
Salar Khudhur Hussein
Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw
author_sort Shalaw Abdullah Saleh
collection DOAJ
description Subgrade soil plays an important role in road structural design; therefore, poor subgrade soil may cause insufficient support for the pavement and may reduce its life. The poor properties subgrade soil should be replaced with a strong soil to improve the pavements properties and this cost a lot. Considering that, improving the poor subgrade soil properties by mixing it with different additive materials in site and stabilize it may be a better solution. This study was carried out to improve sample subgrade soil properties by stabilizing it using three different additive materials with different properties and quantities. For this purpose (ordinary portland cement), (limestone powder) and (fly ash) with percentages of (3%, 6% and 10%) were utilized. The modified mixture test results of (proctor test), Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR test) showed that stabilization of the subgrade soil using different percentages of those additives improved the mechanical properties of the subgrade soil. Utilizing the above additive percentages, the CBR values improved from (5.25%) to (44.3%, 71%, 102.5%) while cement was utilized and to (8.75%, 9%, 10.2%) when fly ash was utilized and to (9.95%, 10.94%, 12.6%) with lime used.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:52:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0100b3fb7cbd41f9a7c025b7fbde18d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-5629
2414-5602
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:52:07Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Tishk International University
record_format Article
series Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-0100b3fb7cbd41f9a7c025b7fbde18d12023-09-02T06:52:04ZengTishk International UniversityEurasian Journal of Science and Engineering2414-56292414-56022020-12-0162395210.23918/eajse.v6i2p39Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly AshShalaw Abdullah Saleh0Salar Khudhur Hussein1Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw2Civil Engineering Department, Tishk International University, Erbil, IraqCivil Engineering Department, Technical College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Iraq3Road Construction Department, Erbil Technology College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Iraq & Civil Engineering Department, Tishk International University, Erbil, IraqSubgrade soil plays an important role in road structural design; therefore, poor subgrade soil may cause insufficient support for the pavement and may reduce its life. The poor properties subgrade soil should be replaced with a strong soil to improve the pavements properties and this cost a lot. Considering that, improving the poor subgrade soil properties by mixing it with different additive materials in site and stabilize it may be a better solution. This study was carried out to improve sample subgrade soil properties by stabilizing it using three different additive materials with different properties and quantities. For this purpose (ordinary portland cement), (limestone powder) and (fly ash) with percentages of (3%, 6% and 10%) were utilized. The modified mixture test results of (proctor test), Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR test) showed that stabilization of the subgrade soil using different percentages of those additives improved the mechanical properties of the subgrade soil. Utilizing the above additive percentages, the CBR values improved from (5.25%) to (44.3%, 71%, 102.5%) while cement was utilized and to (8.75%, 9%, 10.2%) when fly ash was utilized and to (9.95%, 10.94%, 12.6%) with lime used.https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-6-issue-2-article-5/soil stabilizationordinary portland cementfly ashcbrlimestone powderwater contentadditives
spellingShingle Shalaw Abdullah Saleh
Salar Khudhur Hussein
Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw
Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering
soil stabilization
ordinary portland cement
fly ash
cbr
limestone powder
water content
additives
title Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
title_full Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
title_fullStr Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
title_short Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
title_sort effect of soil stabilization on subgrade soil using cement lime and fly ash
topic soil stabilization
ordinary portland cement
fly ash
cbr
limestone powder
water content
additives
url https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-6-issue-2-article-5/
work_keys_str_mv AT shalawabdullahsaleh effectofsoilstabilizationonsubgradesoilusingcementlimeandflyash
AT salarkhudhurhussein effectofsoilstabilizationonsubgradesoilusingcementlimeandflyash
AT ganjeenajalalkhoshnaw effectofsoilstabilizationonsubgradesoilusingcementlimeandflyash