Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash
Subgrade soil plays an important role in road structural design; therefore, poor subgrade soil may cause insufficient support for the pavement and may reduce its life. The poor properties subgrade soil should be replaced with a strong soil to improve the pavements properties and this cost a lot. Con...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tishk International University
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-6-issue-2-article-5/ |
_version_ | 1797726900861272064 |
---|---|
author | Shalaw Abdullah Saleh Salar Khudhur Hussein Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw |
author_facet | Shalaw Abdullah Saleh Salar Khudhur Hussein Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw |
author_sort | Shalaw Abdullah Saleh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Subgrade soil plays an important role in road structural design; therefore, poor subgrade soil may cause insufficient support for the pavement and may reduce its life. The poor properties subgrade soil should be replaced with a strong soil to improve the pavements properties and this cost a lot. Considering that, improving the poor subgrade soil properties by mixing it with different additive materials in site and stabilize it may be a better solution. This study was carried out to improve sample subgrade soil properties by stabilizing it using three different additive materials with different properties and quantities. For this purpose (ordinary portland cement), (limestone powder) and (fly ash) with percentages of (3%, 6% and 10%) were utilized. The modified mixture test results of (proctor test), Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR test) showed that stabilization of the subgrade soil using different percentages of those additives improved the mechanical properties of the subgrade soil. Utilizing the above additive percentages, the CBR values improved from (5.25%) to (44.3%, 71%, 102.5%) while cement was utilized and to (8.75%, 9%, 10.2%) when fly ash was utilized and to (9.95%, 10.94%, 12.6%) with lime used. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:52:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0100b3fb7cbd41f9a7c025b7fbde18d1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2414-5629 2414-5602 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:52:07Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | Tishk International University |
record_format | Article |
series | Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-0100b3fb7cbd41f9a7c025b7fbde18d12023-09-02T06:52:04ZengTishk International UniversityEurasian Journal of Science and Engineering2414-56292414-56022020-12-0162395210.23918/eajse.v6i2p39Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly AshShalaw Abdullah Saleh0Salar Khudhur Hussein1Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw2Civil Engineering Department, Tishk International University, Erbil, IraqCivil Engineering Department, Technical College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Iraq3Road Construction Department, Erbil Technology College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Iraq & Civil Engineering Department, Tishk International University, Erbil, IraqSubgrade soil plays an important role in road structural design; therefore, poor subgrade soil may cause insufficient support for the pavement and may reduce its life. The poor properties subgrade soil should be replaced with a strong soil to improve the pavements properties and this cost a lot. Considering that, improving the poor subgrade soil properties by mixing it with different additive materials in site and stabilize it may be a better solution. This study was carried out to improve sample subgrade soil properties by stabilizing it using three different additive materials with different properties and quantities. For this purpose (ordinary portland cement), (limestone powder) and (fly ash) with percentages of (3%, 6% and 10%) were utilized. The modified mixture test results of (proctor test), Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR test) showed that stabilization of the subgrade soil using different percentages of those additives improved the mechanical properties of the subgrade soil. Utilizing the above additive percentages, the CBR values improved from (5.25%) to (44.3%, 71%, 102.5%) while cement was utilized and to (8.75%, 9%, 10.2%) when fly ash was utilized and to (9.95%, 10.94%, 12.6%) with lime used.https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-6-issue-2-article-5/soil stabilizationordinary portland cementfly ashcbrlimestone powderwater contentadditives |
spellingShingle | Shalaw Abdullah Saleh Salar Khudhur Hussein Ganjeena Jalal Khoshnaw Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering soil stabilization ordinary portland cement fly ash cbr limestone powder water content additives |
title | Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash |
title_full | Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash |
title_fullStr | Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash |
title_short | Effect of Soil Stabilization on Subgrade Soil Using Cement, Lime and Fly Ash |
title_sort | effect of soil stabilization on subgrade soil using cement lime and fly ash |
topic | soil stabilization ordinary portland cement fly ash cbr limestone powder water content additives |
url | https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-6-issue-2-article-5/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shalawabdullahsaleh effectofsoilstabilizationonsubgradesoilusingcementlimeandflyash AT salarkhudhurhussein effectofsoilstabilizationonsubgradesoilusingcementlimeandflyash AT ganjeenajalalkhoshnaw effectofsoilstabilizationonsubgradesoilusingcementlimeandflyash |