Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
The current study examined the reliability and consistency of switching and mixing costs in the language and the color-shape tasks in three pre-existing data sets, to assess whether they are equally well suited for the study of individual differences. Specifically, we considered if the language task...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/140 |
_version_ | 1819061266230018048 |
---|---|
author | Dorit Segal Anat Prior Tamar H. Gollan |
author_facet | Dorit Segal Anat Prior Tamar H. Gollan |
author_sort | Dorit Segal |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The current study examined the reliability and consistency of switching and mixing costs in the language and the color-shape tasks in three pre-existing data sets, to assess whether they are equally well suited for the study of individual differences. Specifically, we considered if the language task is as reliable as the color-shape task – an important question given the wide use of language switching tasks but little information available to address this question. Switching costs had low to moderate reliability and internal consistency, and these were similar for the language and the color-shape tasks. Mixing costs were more reliable in the language task than in the color-shape task when tested twice on the same day and trended in the same direction when tested a week apart. In addition, mixing costs were larger and more consistent than switching costs in all data sets and they were also were more reliable than switching costs in the language task when tested on the same day. These results reveal the language task to be as good as the color-shape task for measuring switching and mixing ability. Low variability of switching costs may decrease their reliability and consistency, in turn interfering with the chance of detecting cross task correlations. We advocate for exploring procedures to increase the variability of switching costs, which might increase reliability and consistency of these measures, and improve the ability to determine if bilingual language use relies on cognitive mechanisms that overlap with those underlying nonlinguistic multi-tasking. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T14:40:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-01044f5b99a04d03904cb8d90bb54998 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2514-4820 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T14:40:09Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Cognition |
spelling | doaj.art-01044f5b99a04d03904cb8d90bb549982022-12-21T19:00:12ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-01-014110.5334/joc.140150Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing CostsDorit Segal0Anat Prior1Tamar H. Gollan2University of California, San DiegoUniversity of HaifaUniversity of California, San DiegoThe current study examined the reliability and consistency of switching and mixing costs in the language and the color-shape tasks in three pre-existing data sets, to assess whether they are equally well suited for the study of individual differences. Specifically, we considered if the language task is as reliable as the color-shape task – an important question given the wide use of language switching tasks but little information available to address this question. Switching costs had low to moderate reliability and internal consistency, and these were similar for the language and the color-shape tasks. Mixing costs were more reliable in the language task than in the color-shape task when tested twice on the same day and trended in the same direction when tested a week apart. In addition, mixing costs were larger and more consistent than switching costs in all data sets and they were also were more reliable than switching costs in the language task when tested on the same day. These results reveal the language task to be as good as the color-shape task for measuring switching and mixing ability. Low variability of switching costs may decrease their reliability and consistency, in turn interfering with the chance of detecting cross task correlations. We advocate for exploring procedures to increase the variability of switching costs, which might increase reliability and consistency of these measures, and improve the ability to determine if bilingual language use relies on cognitive mechanisms that overlap with those underlying nonlinguistic multi-tasking.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/140reliabilityvariabilitylanguage switchingcolor-shape switchingmulti-taskingbilingualism |
spellingShingle | Dorit Segal Anat Prior Tamar H. Gollan Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs Journal of Cognition reliability variability language switching color-shape switching multi-tasking bilingualism |
title | Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs |
title_full | Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs |
title_fullStr | Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs |
title_full_unstemmed | Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs |
title_short | Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs |
title_sort | do all switches cost the same reliability of language switching and mixing costs |
topic | reliability variability language switching color-shape switching multi-tasking bilingualism |
url | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doritsegal doallswitchescostthesamereliabilityoflanguageswitchingandmixingcosts AT anatprior doallswitchescostthesamereliabilityoflanguageswitchingandmixingcosts AT tamarhgollan doallswitchescostthesamereliabilityoflanguageswitchingandmixingcosts |