Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining

BackgroundPeri‐stent contrast staining (PSS) after metallic drug‐eluting stent deployment is associated with target lesion revascularization and very late stent thrombosis. However, the type of PSS that influences the clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to reveal which PSS type was inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takahiro Tokuda, Masahiro Yamawaki, Mitsuyohi Takahara, Shinsuke Mori, Kenji Makino, Yosuke Honda, Hiroya Takafuji, Takuro Takama, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Yasunari Sakamoto, Hideyuki Takimura, Norihiro Kobayashi, Motoharu Araki, Keisuke Hirano, Yoshiaki Ito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.115.002878
_version_ 1811275109992759296
author Takahiro Tokuda
Masahiro Yamawaki
Mitsuyohi Takahara
Shinsuke Mori
Kenji Makino
Yosuke Honda
Hiroya Takafuji
Takuro Takama
Masakazu Tsutsumi
Yasunari Sakamoto
Hideyuki Takimura
Norihiro Kobayashi
Motoharu Araki
Keisuke Hirano
Yoshiaki Ito
author_facet Takahiro Tokuda
Masahiro Yamawaki
Mitsuyohi Takahara
Shinsuke Mori
Kenji Makino
Yosuke Honda
Hiroya Takafuji
Takuro Takama
Masakazu Tsutsumi
Yasunari Sakamoto
Hideyuki Takimura
Norihiro Kobayashi
Motoharu Araki
Keisuke Hirano
Yoshiaki Ito
author_sort Takahiro Tokuda
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPeri‐stent contrast staining (PSS) after metallic drug‐eluting stent deployment is associated with target lesion revascularization and very late stent thrombosis. However, the type of PSS that influences the clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to reveal which PSS type was influencing clinical outcomes. Methods and ResultsThis study included 5580 de novo lesions of 4405 patients who were implanted with a first‐ or second‐generation drug‐eluting stent and who were evaluated using follow‐up angiography within 12 months after stent implantation. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients divided into focal PSS and segmental PSS groups for 6 years after stent implantation. Total PSS was observed in 97 lesions (2.2%), of which 42 and 55 lesions were focal and segmental PSS, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for intraoperative chronic total occlusion (segmental PSS=47.3% versus focal PSS=11.9%, P=0.0001). The incidence of segmental PSS tended to be higher in patients with a first‐generation drug‐eluting stent (83.6% versus 16.4%, P=0.05). The cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis in the 6 years of segmental PSS group was significantly higher than that of the focal PSS group (13.9% versus 0%, P=0.04). The cumulative incidence of overall target lesion revascularization for restenosis, excluding target lesion revascularization procedures for stent thrombosis, was significantly higher in the segmental PSS group (38.0% versus 0%, P=0.01). ConclusionsThe incidence of segmental PSS tended to be higher in patients with a first‐generation drug‐eluting stent and appeared to be significantly associated with target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:32:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0107e9371a864505b8f0e6b8f751f317
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:32:13Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-0107e9371a864505b8f0e6b8f751f3172022-12-22T03:12:14ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802016-03-015310.1161/JAHA.115.002878Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast StainingTakahiro Tokuda0Masahiro Yamawaki1Mitsuyohi Takahara2Shinsuke Mori3Kenji Makino4Yosuke Honda5Hiroya Takafuji6Takuro Takama7Masakazu Tsutsumi8Yasunari Sakamoto9Hideyuki Takimura10Norihiro Kobayashi11Motoharu Araki12Keisuke Hirano13Yoshiaki Ito14Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Diabetes Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, JapanBackgroundPeri‐stent contrast staining (PSS) after metallic drug‐eluting stent deployment is associated with target lesion revascularization and very late stent thrombosis. However, the type of PSS that influences the clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to reveal which PSS type was influencing clinical outcomes. Methods and ResultsThis study included 5580 de novo lesions of 4405 patients who were implanted with a first‐ or second‐generation drug‐eluting stent and who were evaluated using follow‐up angiography within 12 months after stent implantation. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients divided into focal PSS and segmental PSS groups for 6 years after stent implantation. Total PSS was observed in 97 lesions (2.2%), of which 42 and 55 lesions were focal and segmental PSS, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for intraoperative chronic total occlusion (segmental PSS=47.3% versus focal PSS=11.9%, P=0.0001). The incidence of segmental PSS tended to be higher in patients with a first‐generation drug‐eluting stent (83.6% versus 16.4%, P=0.05). The cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis in the 6 years of segmental PSS group was significantly higher than that of the focal PSS group (13.9% versus 0%, P=0.04). The cumulative incidence of overall target lesion revascularization for restenosis, excluding target lesion revascularization procedures for stent thrombosis, was significantly higher in the segmental PSS group (38.0% versus 0%, P=0.01). ConclusionsThe incidence of segmental PSS tended to be higher in patients with a first‐generation drug‐eluting stent and appeared to be significantly associated with target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.115.002878peri‐stent contrast stainingsegmental peri‐stent contrast stainingstent thrombosis
spellingShingle Takahiro Tokuda
Masahiro Yamawaki
Mitsuyohi Takahara
Shinsuke Mori
Kenji Makino
Yosuke Honda
Hiroya Takafuji
Takuro Takama
Masakazu Tsutsumi
Yasunari Sakamoto
Hideyuki Takimura
Norihiro Kobayashi
Motoharu Araki
Keisuke Hirano
Yoshiaki Ito
Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
peri‐stent contrast staining
segmental peri‐stent contrast staining
stent thrombosis
title Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining
title_full Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining
title_fullStr Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining
title_short Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri‐Stent Contrast Staining
title_sort comparison of long term clinical outcomes of lesions exhibiting focal and segmental peri stent contrast staining
topic peri‐stent contrast staining
segmental peri‐stent contrast staining
stent thrombosis
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.115.002878
work_keys_str_mv AT takahirotokuda comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT masahiroyamawaki comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT mitsuyohitakahara comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT shinsukemori comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT kenjimakino comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT yosukehonda comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT hiroyatakafuji comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT takurotakama comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT masakazutsutsumi comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT yasunarisakamoto comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT hideyukitakimura comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT norihirokobayashi comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT motoharuaraki comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT keisukehirano comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining
AT yoshiakiito comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesoflesionsexhibitingfocalandsegmentalperistentcontraststaining