Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)

Purpose: Aim of this retrospective cohort study was the comparison of the transiliac fixator (TIFI) and spinopelvic fixation (SPF) for fixation of dorsal pelvic ring fractures in terms of clinical outcome, complications, and quality of life.Methods: Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women; mean age...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ricarda Johanna Seemann, Erik Hempel, Gabriele Rußow, Serafeim Tsitsilonis, Ulrich Stöckle, Sven Märdian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.745051/full
_version_ 1818346317763575808
author Ricarda Johanna Seemann
Erik Hempel
Gabriele Rußow
Gabriele Rußow
Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Ulrich Stöckle
Sven Märdian
author_facet Ricarda Johanna Seemann
Erik Hempel
Gabriele Rußow
Gabriele Rußow
Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Ulrich Stöckle
Sven Märdian
author_sort Ricarda Johanna Seemann
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Aim of this retrospective cohort study was the comparison of the transiliac fixator (TIFI) and spinopelvic fixation (SPF) for fixation of dorsal pelvic ring fractures in terms of clinical outcome, complications, and quality of life.Methods: Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women; mean age 47 ± 19 years) with dorsal pelvic ring fractures (type-C-injuries after AO/OTA) that have been stabilized by either TIFI (group TIFI, n = 22) or SPF (group SPF, n = 16) between May 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measurements included demographic data, perioperative parameters, and complications and were obtained from the medical information system. Quality of life was assessed using the German version of the short form 36 (SF-36) and short muskuloskeletal function assessment (SMFA-D). Clinical results were assessed using Merle d'Aubigné-Score, Iowa Pelvic Score, and Majeed Pelvic Score.Results: Both groups show relatively good post-operative results, which has previously been reported. Quality of life was comparable in both groups. Group TIFI was slightly superior regarding complication rates, cutting/suture time, and fluoroscopy time. Group SPF seemed to be superior regarding pain and pelvic scores.Conclusion: None of the methods could demonstrate significant superiority over the other. Management of pelvic injuries remains a highly individual challenge adapted to the individual patients' condition. Nevertheless, if fractures allow for stabilization with TIFI, the use of this method should be taken into consideration as a less invasive and more tissue-conserving approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T17:16:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-010bde435bc245069f909bae504cf273
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T17:16:21Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-010bde435bc245069f909bae504cf2732022-12-21T23:37:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-11-01810.3389/fsurg.2021.745051745051Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)Ricarda Johanna Seemann0Erik Hempel1Gabriele Rußow2Gabriele Rußow3Serafeim Tsitsilonis4Serafeim Tsitsilonis5Ulrich Stöckle6Sven Märdian7Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyJulius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyJulius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyPurpose: Aim of this retrospective cohort study was the comparison of the transiliac fixator (TIFI) and spinopelvic fixation (SPF) for fixation of dorsal pelvic ring fractures in terms of clinical outcome, complications, and quality of life.Methods: Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women; mean age 47 ± 19 years) with dorsal pelvic ring fractures (type-C-injuries after AO/OTA) that have been stabilized by either TIFI (group TIFI, n = 22) or SPF (group SPF, n = 16) between May 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measurements included demographic data, perioperative parameters, and complications and were obtained from the medical information system. Quality of life was assessed using the German version of the short form 36 (SF-36) and short muskuloskeletal function assessment (SMFA-D). Clinical results were assessed using Merle d'Aubigné-Score, Iowa Pelvic Score, and Majeed Pelvic Score.Results: Both groups show relatively good post-operative results, which has previously been reported. Quality of life was comparable in both groups. Group TIFI was slightly superior regarding complication rates, cutting/suture time, and fluoroscopy time. Group SPF seemed to be superior regarding pain and pelvic scores.Conclusion: None of the methods could demonstrate significant superiority over the other. Management of pelvic injuries remains a highly individual challenge adapted to the individual patients' condition. Nevertheless, if fractures allow for stabilization with TIFI, the use of this method should be taken into consideration as a less invasive and more tissue-conserving approach.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.745051/fulldorsal pelvic ring fracturestransiliac fixatorspinopelvic fixationoutcomePROMS
spellingShingle Ricarda Johanna Seemann
Erik Hempel
Gabriele Rußow
Gabriele Rußow
Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Ulrich Stöckle
Sven Märdian
Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)
Frontiers in Surgery
dorsal pelvic ring fractures
transiliac fixator
spinopelvic fixation
outcome
PROMS
title Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)
title_full Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)
title_fullStr Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)
title_short Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)
title_sort clinical and patient related outcome after stabilization of dorsal pelvic ring fractures a retrospective study comparing transiliac fixator tifi and spinopelvic fixation spf
topic dorsal pelvic ring fractures
transiliac fixator
spinopelvic fixation
outcome
PROMS
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.745051/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ricardajohannaseemann clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT erikhempel clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT gabrielerußow clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT gabrielerußow clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT serafeimtsitsilonis clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT serafeimtsitsilonis clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT ulrichstockle clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf
AT svenmardian clinicalandpatientrelatedoutcomeafterstabilizationofdorsalpelvicringfracturesaretrospectivestudycomparingtransiliacfixatortifiandspinopelvicfixationspf