Better biodiversity accounting is needed to prevent bioperversity and maximize co‐benefits from savanna burning
Abstract Strategies for mitigating climate change through altered land management practices can provide win–win outcomes for the environment and the economy. Emissions trading for greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement in Australia's remote, fire‐prone, and sparsely populated tropical savannas provides...
Main Authors: | Ben Corey, Alan N. Andersen, Sarah Legge, John C. Z. Woinarski, Ian J. Radford, Justin J. Perry |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Conservation Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12685 |
Similar Items
-
Biochar application to temperate grasslands: challenges and opportunities for delivering multiple ecosystem services
by: Robert W. Brown, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Quantification of greenhouse gases emission from sugarcane burnings: a study case in savanna areas of Brazil
by: Alcione Borges, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
by: Tek Narayan Maraseni, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Fire, Rain and CO<sub>2</sub>: Potential Drivers of Tropical Savanna Vegetation Change, with Implications for Carbon Crediting
by: Greg Barber, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Cap and Trade Offsets: the Case for following RGGI’s Model Rule
by: Nathan Markey
Published: (2010-02-01)