Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery

Here we provide the correlation among different carotid ultrasound (US) variables to assess echogenicity n standard carotid US and to assess intraplaque neovascularization on contrast enhanced US. We recruited 45 consecutive subjects with an asymptomatic≥50% carotid artery stenosis. Carotid plaque e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mattia Cattaneo, Daniel Staub, Alessandra P. Porretta, Jeanne Marie Gallino, Paolo Santini, Costanzo Limoni, Rolf Wyttenbach, Augusto Gallino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-12-01
Series:Data in Brief
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916306138
_version_ 1811234138277019648
author Mattia Cattaneo
Daniel Staub
Alessandra P. Porretta
Jeanne Marie Gallino
Paolo Santini
Costanzo Limoni
Rolf Wyttenbach
Augusto Gallino
author_facet Mattia Cattaneo
Daniel Staub
Alessandra P. Porretta
Jeanne Marie Gallino
Paolo Santini
Costanzo Limoni
Rolf Wyttenbach
Augusto Gallino
author_sort Mattia Cattaneo
collection DOAJ
description Here we provide the correlation among different carotid ultrasound (US) variables to assess echogenicity n standard carotid US and to assess intraplaque neovascularization on contrast enhanced US. We recruited 45 consecutive subjects with an asymptomatic≥50% carotid artery stenosis. Carotid plaque echogenicity at standard US was visually graded according to Gray–Weale classification (GW) and measured by the greyscale median (GSM), a semi-automated computerized measurement performed by Adobe Photoshop®. On CEUS imaging IPNV was graded according to the visual appearance of contrast within the plaque according to three different methods: CEUS_A (1=absent; 2=present); CEUS_B a three-point scale (increasing IPNV from 1 to 3); CEUS_C a four-point scale (increasing IPNV from 0 to 3). We have also implemented a new simple quantification method derived from region of interest (ROI) signal intensity ratio as assessed by QLAB software. Further information is available in “Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization and its correlation to plaque echogenicity in human carotid arteries atherosclerosis (M. Cattaneo, D. Staub, A.P. Porretta, J.M. Gallino, P. Santini, C. Limoni et al., 2016) [1].
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:31:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-011df67722874971a7bafd56676221b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-3409
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:31:37Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Data in Brief
spelling doaj.art-011df67722874971a7bafd56676221b72022-12-22T03:34:59ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092016-12-019C56356710.1016/j.dib.2016.09.041Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid arteryMattia Cattaneo0Daniel Staub1Alessandra P. Porretta2Jeanne Marie Gallino3Paolo Santini4Costanzo Limoni5Rolf Wyttenbach6Augusto Gallino7Hospital of San Giovanni, Department of Cardiology, Bellinzona, SwitzerlandUniversity Hospital Basel, Department of Angiology, Basel, SwitzerlandHospital of San Giovanni, Department of Cardiology, Bellinzona, SwitzerlandHospital of San Giovanni, Department of Cardiology, Bellinzona, SwitzerlandHospital of San Giovanni, Department of Radiology, Bellinzona, SwitzerlandUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SwitzerlandHospital of San Giovanni, Department of Radiology, Bellinzona, SwitzerlandHospital of San Giovanni, Department of Cardiology, Bellinzona, SwitzerlandHere we provide the correlation among different carotid ultrasound (US) variables to assess echogenicity n standard carotid US and to assess intraplaque neovascularization on contrast enhanced US. We recruited 45 consecutive subjects with an asymptomatic≥50% carotid artery stenosis. Carotid plaque echogenicity at standard US was visually graded according to Gray–Weale classification (GW) and measured by the greyscale median (GSM), a semi-automated computerized measurement performed by Adobe Photoshop®. On CEUS imaging IPNV was graded according to the visual appearance of contrast within the plaque according to three different methods: CEUS_A (1=absent; 2=present); CEUS_B a three-point scale (increasing IPNV from 1 to 3); CEUS_C a four-point scale (increasing IPNV from 0 to 3). We have also implemented a new simple quantification method derived from region of interest (ROI) signal intensity ratio as assessed by QLAB software. Further information is available in “Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization and its correlation to plaque echogenicity in human carotid arteries atherosclerosis (M. Cattaneo, D. Staub, A.P. Porretta, J.M. Gallino, P. Santini, C. Limoni et al., 2016) [1].http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916306138Contrast enhanced ultrasoundEchogenicityCarotid atherosclerosis
spellingShingle Mattia Cattaneo
Daniel Staub
Alessandra P. Porretta
Jeanne Marie Gallino
Paolo Santini
Costanzo Limoni
Rolf Wyttenbach
Augusto Gallino
Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
Data in Brief
Contrast enhanced ultrasound
Echogenicity
Carotid atherosclerosis
title Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
title_full Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
title_fullStr Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
title_full_unstemmed Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
title_short Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
title_sort data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery
topic Contrast enhanced ultrasound
Echogenicity
Carotid atherosclerosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916306138
work_keys_str_mv AT mattiacattaneo dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT danielstaub dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT alessandrapporretta dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT jeannemariegallino dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT paolosantini dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT costanzolimoni dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT rolfwyttenbach dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery
AT augustogallino dataonconsistencyamongdifferentmethodstoassessatheroscleroticplaqueechogenicityonstandardultrasoundandintraplaqueneovascularizationoncontrastenhancedultrasoundimaginginhumancarotidartery