Submission of structural biology data for review purposes

Submission of structural biology data for review purposes

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Edward N. Baker, Charles S. Bond, Elspeth F. Garman, Janet Newman, Randy J. Read, Mark J. van Raaij
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	International Union of Crystallography 2022-01-01
Series:	IUCrJ
Subjects:	structural biology data peer review
Online Access:	http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S2052252521012999

Similar Items

AlphaFold and the future of structural biology
by: Randy J. Read, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)

Peer Review of Research Data Submissions to ScholarsArchive@OSU: How can we improve the curation of research datasets to enhance reusability?
by: Clara Llebot, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Online Submission and Review System for Open Science: A Case of AccessON Peer Review Management System Plus (ACOMS+)
by: Jaemin Chung, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals
by: Daniel Garcia-Costa, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/ViIqTX]
by: Iain Chalmers, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Uniform manuscript submission formats: The need and challenges
by: Molly Mary Thabah, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Patterns of database citation in articles and patents indicate long-term scientific and industry value of biological data resources [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: David Bousfield, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

Quantifying professionalism in peer review
by: Travis G. Gerwing, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Peer Feedback Tool for Lectures & Small-Group Teaching
by: Maria Blanco, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)

Indexed journals – Roles and purpose
by: Kuldeep Singh Shekhawat, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Peer Feedback Tool for Clinical Teaching
by: Elisa Zenni, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)

The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Jonathan P. Tennant, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 2; referees: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Jonathan P. Tennant, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)

The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; referees: 3 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Jonathan P. Tennant, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01)

Acknowledgement of Reviewers Vol 7 (2019), IJMS
by: Executive Committee of IJMS
Published: (2019-12-01)

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
by: Francesco Pomponi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

A new twist on peer review
by: Mark Patterson, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

BioéthiqueOnline: Moving to Peer-Review / BioéthiqueOnline : Passage à l’évaluation par les pairs
by: Master, Zubin, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01)

Towards an open science publishing platform [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Vitek Tracz, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

Evaluation of unique identifiers used for citation linking [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Heidi Holst Madsen, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)

An ORCID based synchronization framework for a national CRIS ecosystem [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5dr]
by: João Mendes Moreira, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)

A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Laura McDonald, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Imagining tomorrow's university in an era of open science [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Adina Howe, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

Journal subscription expenditure of UK higher education institutions [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/4v0]
by: Stuart Lawson, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Data publication consensus and controversies [v3; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/4ja]
by: John Kratz, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)

Data publication consensus and controversies [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/3hi]
by: John Kratz, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01)

Evaluation of unique identifiers used as keys to match identical publications in Pure and SciVal – a case study from health science [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Heidi Holst Madsen, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01)

Examination Of Online Submission And Peer Review Systems In Terms Of Author Role Capability In Iranian
by: Fereydoon Azadeh, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)

Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
by: Andrea Capaccioni
Published: (2022-12-01)

Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
by: Amy Bourke-Waite
Published: (2015-07-01)

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
by: Piitu Parmanne, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

The Peer Review Process: An Expanded Role for Repositories
by: Joanna Richardson, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01)

Examination Of Online Submission And Peer Review Systems In Terms Of Author Role Capability In Iranian Medical Journals
by: Fereydoon Azadeh, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)

“Because It Is the Right Thing to Do”: Taking Stock of the Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative
by: Maike Dahrendorf, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Toward a new model of scientific publishing: Discussion and a proposal
by: Dwight eKravitz, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Acknowledgements
by: Engaged Scholar Journal
Published: (2023-12-01)

Acknowledgements
by: Engaged Scholar Journal
Published: (2022-11-01)

Acknowledgements
by: Engaged Scholar Journal
Published: (2022-12-01)

Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation
by: Mauro Guerrini, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

In Appreciation: A Thank-You to Our Industrious Reviewers
by: Darshana T. Shah
Published: (2022-01-01)