Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor

Background: Cuff leak test (CLT) has been proposed as a simple method of predicting post-extubation stridor (PES), however due to different cut-off point of cuff-leak volume between previous studies, the laryngeal ultrasonography (US) including measurement of air column width was used to predict PES...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mai A. Sahbal, Kamel A. Mohamed, Hanan H. Zaghla, Mahmoud M. Kenawy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2017-12-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300361
_version_ 1827333135537274880
author Mai A. Sahbal
Kamel A. Mohamed
Hanan H. Zaghla
Mahmoud M. Kenawy
author_facet Mai A. Sahbal
Kamel A. Mohamed
Hanan H. Zaghla
Mahmoud M. Kenawy
author_sort Mai A. Sahbal
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cuff leak test (CLT) has been proposed as a simple method of predicting post-extubation stridor (PES), however due to different cut-off point of cuff-leak volume between previous studies, the laryngeal ultrasonography (US) including measurement of air column width was used to predict PES. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of laryngeal US versus cuff leak test in predicting PES. Methods: The study included fifty patients admitted to the Critical Care Department, Cairo University Hospitals from the period of November 2014 to January 2016, intubated for at least 24 h and examined prior to extubation using CLT and laryngeal ultrasound. Results: Four cases developed PES. CLT identified PES patients with a sensitivity of 75%, with PPV of 50% for leakage volume of 132.5 ml. Laryngeal ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 50% for those patients with air column width before deflation less than 10.955 mm and air column width difference (ACWD) of 0.905 mm with PPV of 11.8% and 14.3% for both respectively. Conclusion: Both CLT and laryngeal US might have low sensitivity and PPV in predicting PES and should be used with caution in prediction of PES.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:15:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-014b845788144078b3c4e93f08c81f67
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-7303
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:15:24Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
spelling doaj.art-014b845788144078b3c4e93f08c81f672024-03-02T22:18:50ZengSpringerEgyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine2090-73032017-12-0153838610.1016/j.ejccm.2017.10.002Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridorMai A. SahbalKamel A. MohamedHanan H. ZaghlaMahmoud M. KenawyBackground: Cuff leak test (CLT) has been proposed as a simple method of predicting post-extubation stridor (PES), however due to different cut-off point of cuff-leak volume between previous studies, the laryngeal ultrasonography (US) including measurement of air column width was used to predict PES. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of laryngeal US versus cuff leak test in predicting PES. Methods: The study included fifty patients admitted to the Critical Care Department, Cairo University Hospitals from the period of November 2014 to January 2016, intubated for at least 24 h and examined prior to extubation using CLT and laryngeal ultrasound. Results: Four cases developed PES. CLT identified PES patients with a sensitivity of 75%, with PPV of 50% for leakage volume of 132.5 ml. Laryngeal ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 50% for those patients with air column width before deflation less than 10.955 mm and air column width difference (ACWD) of 0.905 mm with PPV of 11.8% and 14.3% for both respectively. Conclusion: Both CLT and laryngeal US might have low sensitivity and PPV in predicting PES and should be used with caution in prediction of PES.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300361Cuff leak testLaryngeal ultrasonographyLaryngeal edemaPost-extubation stridor
spellingShingle Mai A. Sahbal
Kamel A. Mohamed
Hanan H. Zaghla
Mahmoud M. Kenawy
Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor
Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Cuff leak test
Laryngeal ultrasonography
Laryngeal edema
Post-extubation stridor
title Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor
title_full Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor
title_fullStr Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor
title_full_unstemmed Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor
title_short Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor
title_sort laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post extubation stridor
topic Cuff leak test
Laryngeal ultrasonography
Laryngeal edema
Post-extubation stridor
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300361
work_keys_str_mv AT maiasahbal laryngealultrasoundversuscuffleaktestinpredictionofpostextubationstridor
AT kamelamohamed laryngealultrasoundversuscuffleaktestinpredictionofpostextubationstridor
AT hananhzaghla laryngealultrasoundversuscuffleaktestinpredictionofpostextubationstridor
AT mahmoudmkenawy laryngealultrasoundversuscuffleaktestinpredictionofpostextubationstridor