Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences
Abstract Background Many suggest that shared decision-making (SDM) is the most effective approach to clinical counseling. It is unclear if this applies to surgical decision-making-especially regarding urgent, highly-morbid operations. In this scoping review, we identify articles that address patient...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0 |
| _version_ | 1818347841321435136 |
|---|---|
| author | Laura A. Shinkunas Caleb J. Klipowicz Erica M. Carlisle |
| author_facet | Laura A. Shinkunas Caleb J. Klipowicz Erica M. Carlisle |
| author_sort | Laura A. Shinkunas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Many suggest that shared decision-making (SDM) is the most effective approach to clinical counseling. It is unclear if this applies to surgical decision-making-especially regarding urgent, highly-morbid operations. In this scoping review, we identify articles that address patient and surgeon preferences toward SDM in surgery. Methods We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to develop our protocol. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception through 11.2017. Title/abstract review identified peer-reviewed, empirical articles that addressed patient/surgeon preferences toward SDM in surgery. Identified articles underwent full review by two independent investigators. We addressed the following questions: (1) What is known from existing empirical evidence about patients’ and/or surgeons’ surgical decision-making preferences? (2) Why might patients and/or surgeons prefer SDM? (3) Does acuity of intervention impact surgical decision-making preferences? Outcome measures included study methods, surgical specialty, diagnosis, study location/setting, type/number of subjects, acuity of intervention, surgeon/patient decision-making preferences, and factors associated with favoring SDM. Data was analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Results 20,359 articles were identified with 4988 duplicates, yielding 15,371 articles for title/abstract review. 74 articles were included in final analysis. 68% of articles discussed oncologic decision-making. 46% of these focused on breast cancer. 92% of articles included patients, 22% included surgeons. 75% of articles found surgeons favored SDM, 25% demonstrated surgeons favored surgeon guidance. 54% of articles demonstrated patients favored SDM, 35% showed patients favored surgeon guidance, 11% showed patients preferred independent decision-making. The most common factors for patients favoring SDM included female gender, higher education, and younger age. For surgeons, the most common factors for favoring SDM included limited evidence for a given treatment plan, multiple treatment options, and impact on patient lifestyle. No articles evaluated decision-making preferences in an emergent setting. Conclusions There has been limited evaluation of patient and surgeon preferences toward SDM in surgical decision-making. Generally, patients and surgeons expressed preference toward SDM. None of the articles evaluated decision-making preferences in an emergent setting, so assessment of the impact of acuity on decision-making preferences is limited. Extension of research to complex, emergent clinical settings is needed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T17:40:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-015284ade6b04542a7a13971620688fc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6947 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T17:40:34Z |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
| spelling | doaj.art-015284ade6b04542a7a13971620688fc2022-12-21T23:36:45ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472020-08-0120111410.1186/s12911-020-01211-0Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferencesLaura A. Shinkunas0Caleb J. Klipowicz1Erica M. Carlisle2Program in Bioethics and Humanities, University of Iowa Carver College of MedicineDepartment of Anthropology, University of IowaProgram in Bioethics and Humanities, University of Iowa Carver College of MedicineAbstract Background Many suggest that shared decision-making (SDM) is the most effective approach to clinical counseling. It is unclear if this applies to surgical decision-making-especially regarding urgent, highly-morbid operations. In this scoping review, we identify articles that address patient and surgeon preferences toward SDM in surgery. Methods We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to develop our protocol. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception through 11.2017. Title/abstract review identified peer-reviewed, empirical articles that addressed patient/surgeon preferences toward SDM in surgery. Identified articles underwent full review by two independent investigators. We addressed the following questions: (1) What is known from existing empirical evidence about patients’ and/or surgeons’ surgical decision-making preferences? (2) Why might patients and/or surgeons prefer SDM? (3) Does acuity of intervention impact surgical decision-making preferences? Outcome measures included study methods, surgical specialty, diagnosis, study location/setting, type/number of subjects, acuity of intervention, surgeon/patient decision-making preferences, and factors associated with favoring SDM. Data was analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Results 20,359 articles were identified with 4988 duplicates, yielding 15,371 articles for title/abstract review. 74 articles were included in final analysis. 68% of articles discussed oncologic decision-making. 46% of these focused on breast cancer. 92% of articles included patients, 22% included surgeons. 75% of articles found surgeons favored SDM, 25% demonstrated surgeons favored surgeon guidance. 54% of articles demonstrated patients favored SDM, 35% showed patients favored surgeon guidance, 11% showed patients preferred independent decision-making. The most common factors for patients favoring SDM included female gender, higher education, and younger age. For surgeons, the most common factors for favoring SDM included limited evidence for a given treatment plan, multiple treatment options, and impact on patient lifestyle. No articles evaluated decision-making preferences in an emergent setting. Conclusions There has been limited evaluation of patient and surgeon preferences toward SDM in surgical decision-making. Generally, patients and surgeons expressed preference toward SDM. None of the articles evaluated decision-making preferences in an emergent setting, so assessment of the impact of acuity on decision-making preferences is limited. Extension of research to complex, emergent clinical settings is needed.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0SurgeryShared decision makingEthics |
| spellingShingle | Laura A. Shinkunas Caleb J. Klipowicz Erica M. Carlisle Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Surgery Shared decision making Ethics |
| title | Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences |
| title_full | Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences |
| title_fullStr | Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences |
| title_full_unstemmed | Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences |
| title_short | Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences |
| title_sort | shared decision making in surgery a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences |
| topic | Surgery Shared decision making Ethics |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lauraashinkunas shareddecisionmakinginsurgeryascopingreviewofpatientandsurgeonpreferences AT calebjklipowicz shareddecisionmakinginsurgeryascopingreviewofpatientandsurgeonpreferences AT ericamcarlisle shareddecisionmakinginsurgeryascopingreviewofpatientandsurgeonpreferences |