A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy

Abstract Background Malaria chemoprophylaxis options in pregnancy are limited, and atovaquone–proguanil (AP) is not recommended because of insufficient safety evidence. An anonymous, internet-based survey was disseminated to describe outcomes of pregnancies accidentally exposed to AP. Outcomes of in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathrine R. Tan, Jessica K. Fairley, Mengxi Wang, Julie R. Gutman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-05-01
Series:Malaria Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2352-z
_version_ 1818338546521473024
author Kathrine R. Tan
Jessica K. Fairley
Mengxi Wang
Julie R. Gutman
author_facet Kathrine R. Tan
Jessica K. Fairley
Mengxi Wang
Julie R. Gutman
author_sort Kathrine R. Tan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Malaria chemoprophylaxis options in pregnancy are limited, and atovaquone–proguanil (AP) is not recommended because of insufficient safety evidence. An anonymous, internet-based survey was disseminated to describe outcomes of pregnancies accidentally exposed to AP. Outcomes of interest included miscarriage (defined as pregnancy loss before 20 weeks), stillbirth (defined as pregnancy loss at or after 20 weeks), preterm birth or live birth prior to 37 weeks, and the presence of congenital anomalies. Results A total of 487 women responded and reported on 822 pregnancies. Of the 807 pregnancies with information available on exposure and outcomes, 10 (1.2%) had atovaquone–proguanil exposure, all in the first trimester, and all resulted in term births with no birth defects. Conclusions Use of an anti-malarial not recommended in pregnancy is likely to occur before the woman knows of her pregnancy. This study adds to the limited evidence of the safety of AP in pregnancy. Further study on use of AP in pregnancy should be a high priority, as an alternative option for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy in non-immune travellers is urgently needed.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:12:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-015c150366bb4a128418116f3f2f1b63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-2875
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:12:50Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Malaria Journal
spelling doaj.art-015c150366bb4a128418116f3f2f1b632022-12-21T23:40:48ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752018-05-011711410.1186/s12936-018-2352-zA survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancyKathrine R. Tan0Jessica K. Fairley1Mengxi Wang2Julie R. Gutman3Malaria Branch, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of MedicineDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory UniversityMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAbstract Background Malaria chemoprophylaxis options in pregnancy are limited, and atovaquone–proguanil (AP) is not recommended because of insufficient safety evidence. An anonymous, internet-based survey was disseminated to describe outcomes of pregnancies accidentally exposed to AP. Outcomes of interest included miscarriage (defined as pregnancy loss before 20 weeks), stillbirth (defined as pregnancy loss at or after 20 weeks), preterm birth or live birth prior to 37 weeks, and the presence of congenital anomalies. Results A total of 487 women responded and reported on 822 pregnancies. Of the 807 pregnancies with information available on exposure and outcomes, 10 (1.2%) had atovaquone–proguanil exposure, all in the first trimester, and all resulted in term births with no birth defects. Conclusions Use of an anti-malarial not recommended in pregnancy is likely to occur before the woman knows of her pregnancy. This study adds to the limited evidence of the safety of AP in pregnancy. Further study on use of AP in pregnancy should be a high priority, as an alternative option for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy in non-immune travellers is urgently needed.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2352-zMalariaPregnancyProphylaxisAtovaquone–proguanil
spellingShingle Kathrine R. Tan
Jessica K. Fairley
Mengxi Wang
Julie R. Gutman
A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy
Malaria Journal
Malaria
Pregnancy
Prophylaxis
Atovaquone–proguanil
title A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy
title_full A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy
title_fullStr A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy
title_short A survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone–proguanil exposure in pregnancy
title_sort survey on outcomes of accidental atovaquone proguanil exposure in pregnancy
topic Malaria
Pregnancy
Prophylaxis
Atovaquone–proguanil
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2352-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrinertan asurveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT jessicakfairley asurveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT mengxiwang asurveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT juliergutman asurveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT kathrinertan surveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT jessicakfairley surveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT mengxiwang surveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy
AT juliergutman surveyonoutcomesofaccidentalatovaquoneproguanilexposureinpregnancy