Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice

Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns and trends in the editorial process and features of the first decade of Pharmacy Practice, with the final goal of initiating a benchmarking process to enhance the quality of the journal. Methods: Metadata of all of the articles publis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mendes AE, Tonin FS, Fernandez-Llimos F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2016-12-01
Series:Pharmacy Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/847/478
_version_ 1828542635396038656
author Mendes AE
Tonin FS
Fernandez-Llimos F.
author_facet Mendes AE
Tonin FS
Fernandez-Llimos F.
author_sort Mendes AE
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns and trends in the editorial process and features of the first decade of Pharmacy Practice, with the final goal of initiating a benchmarking process to enhance the quality of the journal. Methods: Metadata of all of the articles published from 2006 issue #3 to 2016 issue #2 were extracted from PubMed and complemented by a manual data extraction process on the full-text articles. Citations of these articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar on August 15, 2016. The references from all of the articles published by Pharmacy Practice in 2015 were also extracted. International collaboration was explored with a network analysis. Results: A total of 40 issues were published in this timespan, including 349 articles, 91.1% of which were original research articles. The number of citations received by these articles varies from 809, as reported by the WOS, to the 1162 reported by Scopus and the 2610 reported by Google Scholar. The journals cited by Pharmacy Practice are mainly pharmacy journals, including Pharm Pract (Granada), Int J Clin Pharm, Am J Health-Syst Pharm, Am J Pharm Educ, and Ann Pharmacother. Only 17.3% of the articles involved international collaboration. Delays in the editorial process increased in 2013, mainly due to an increase in acceptance delay (mean=138 days). Conclusion: Pharmacy Practice has improved its visibility and impact over the past decade, especially after 2014, when the journal became indexed in PubMed Central. The editorial process duration is one of the weaknesses that should be tackled. Further studies should investigate if the low international collaboration rate is common across other pharmacy journals.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:59:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-016718d754a9424bbe51c17746b21675
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1885-642X
1886-3655
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:59:36Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format Article
series Pharmacy Practice
spelling doaj.art-016718d754a9424bbe51c17746b216752022-12-22T00:42:12ZengCentro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones FarmaceuticasPharmacy Practice1885-642X1886-36552016-12-0114484784710.18549/PharmPract.2016.04.847Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy PracticeMendes AETonin FSFernandez-Llimos F. Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns and trends in the editorial process and features of the first decade of Pharmacy Practice, with the final goal of initiating a benchmarking process to enhance the quality of the journal. Methods: Metadata of all of the articles published from 2006 issue #3 to 2016 issue #2 were extracted from PubMed and complemented by a manual data extraction process on the full-text articles. Citations of these articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar on August 15, 2016. The references from all of the articles published by Pharmacy Practice in 2015 were also extracted. International collaboration was explored with a network analysis. Results: A total of 40 issues were published in this timespan, including 349 articles, 91.1% of which were original research articles. The number of citations received by these articles varies from 809, as reported by the WOS, to the 1162 reported by Scopus and the 2610 reported by Google Scholar. The journals cited by Pharmacy Practice are mainly pharmacy journals, including Pharm Pract (Granada), Int J Clin Pharm, Am J Health-Syst Pharm, Am J Pharm Educ, and Ann Pharmacother. Only 17.3% of the articles involved international collaboration. Delays in the editorial process increased in 2013, mainly due to an increase in acceptance delay (mean=138 days). Conclusion: Pharmacy Practice has improved its visibility and impact over the past decade, especially after 2014, when the journal became indexed in PubMed Central. The editorial process duration is one of the weaknesses that should be tackled. Further studies should investigate if the low international collaboration rate is common across other pharmacy journals.http://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/847/478Periodicals as TopicBibliometricsAuthorshipPublishingCooperative BehaviorPharmacists
spellingShingle Mendes AE
Tonin FS
Fernandez-Llimos F.
Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
Pharmacy Practice
Periodicals as Topic
Bibliometrics
Authorship
Publishing
Cooperative Behavior
Pharmacists
title Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
title_full Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
title_fullStr Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
title_short Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
title_sort analysis of ten years of publishing in pharmacy practice
topic Periodicals as Topic
Bibliometrics
Authorship
Publishing
Cooperative Behavior
Pharmacists
url http://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/847/478
work_keys_str_mv AT mendesae analysisoftenyearsofpublishinginpharmacypractice
AT toninfs analysisoftenyearsofpublishinginpharmacypractice
AT fernandezllimosf analysisoftenyearsofpublishinginpharmacypractice