A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes

We examine the coseismic influence of the 5 July 2019, M<sub>W</sub>7.1 Ridgecrest and the 24 June 2020 M<sub>W</sub>5.8 Owens Lake earthquakes on rockfall distributions in two undisturbed high-altitude areas of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. These eve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louis A. Scuderi, Evans A. Onyango, Timothy Nagle-McNaughton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/8/1962
_version_ 1827743798784950272
author Louis A. Scuderi
Evans A. Onyango
Timothy Nagle-McNaughton
author_facet Louis A. Scuderi
Evans A. Onyango
Timothy Nagle-McNaughton
author_sort Louis A. Scuderi
collection DOAJ
description We examine the coseismic influence of the 5 July 2019, M<sub>W</sub>7.1 Ridgecrest and the 24 June 2020 M<sub>W</sub>5.8 Owens Lake earthquakes on rockfall distributions in two undisturbed high-altitude areas of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. These events occurred within the geologically recent (<2 Mya) Walker Lane/eastern California shear zone. While both study areas are characterized as plutonic, the Owens Lake event largely affected terrain that was formerly glaciated and oversteepened while the Ridgecrest event affected non-glaciated terrain. Our inventory of rockfall locations was derived from analysis of Sentinel-2 images acquired just prior to and immediately after the events. This difference mapping approach using readily-available Sentinel-2 imagery allows for rapid rockfall and landslide mapping. GIS analysis shows that even though the total area assessed for both earthquakes was similar (~1500 km<sup>2</sup>), the significantly lower magnitude Owens Lake event produced nearly twice as many (102) mappable rockslides as the significantly stronger Ridgecrest event (58), a difference likely due to slope oversteepening in the formerly glaciated area. Significant seismic amplification by topography and reactivation of preexisting failures was apparent for both areas. Inclusion of these factors may improve failure predictions and rockfall probability estimation.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:34:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-016fc612188a4e0fb27dc4384ad75131
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:34:36Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-016fc612188a4e0fb27dc4384ad751312023-11-17T21:10:04ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-04-01158196210.3390/rs15081962A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) EarthquakesLouis A. Scuderi0Evans A. Onyango1Timothy Nagle-McNaughton2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USAWe examine the coseismic influence of the 5 July 2019, M<sub>W</sub>7.1 Ridgecrest and the 24 June 2020 M<sub>W</sub>5.8 Owens Lake earthquakes on rockfall distributions in two undisturbed high-altitude areas of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. These events occurred within the geologically recent (<2 Mya) Walker Lane/eastern California shear zone. While both study areas are characterized as plutonic, the Owens Lake event largely affected terrain that was formerly glaciated and oversteepened while the Ridgecrest event affected non-glaciated terrain. Our inventory of rockfall locations was derived from analysis of Sentinel-2 images acquired just prior to and immediately after the events. This difference mapping approach using readily-available Sentinel-2 imagery allows for rapid rockfall and landslide mapping. GIS analysis shows that even though the total area assessed for both earthquakes was similar (~1500 km<sup>2</sup>), the significantly lower magnitude Owens Lake event produced nearly twice as many (102) mappable rockslides as the significantly stronger Ridgecrest event (58), a difference likely due to slope oversteepening in the formerly glaciated area. Significant seismic amplification by topography and reactivation of preexisting failures was apparent for both areas. Inclusion of these factors may improve failure predictions and rockfall probability estimation.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/8/1962rockfallSentinel-2difference mappingearthquakeeastern California shear zoneSierra Nevada
spellingShingle Louis A. Scuderi
Evans A. Onyango
Timothy Nagle-McNaughton
A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes
Remote Sensing
rockfall
Sentinel-2
difference mapping
earthquake
eastern California shear zone
Sierra Nevada
title A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes
title_full A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes
title_fullStr A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes
title_full_unstemmed A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes
title_short A Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis of Rockfall Distributions from the 5 July 2019 Ridgecrest (M<sub>W</sub>7.1) and 24 June 2020 Owens Lake (M<sub>W</sub>5.8) Earthquakes
title_sort remote sensing and gis analysis of rockfall distributions from the 5 july 2019 ridgecrest m sub w sub 7 1 and 24 june 2020 owens lake m sub w sub 5 8 earthquakes
topic rockfall
Sentinel-2
difference mapping
earthquake
eastern California shear zone
Sierra Nevada
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/8/1962
work_keys_str_mv AT louisascuderi aremotesensingandgisanalysisofrockfalldistributionsfromthe5july2019ridgecrestmsubwsub71and24june2020owenslakemsubwsub58earthquakes
AT evansaonyango aremotesensingandgisanalysisofrockfalldistributionsfromthe5july2019ridgecrestmsubwsub71and24june2020owenslakemsubwsub58earthquakes
AT timothynaglemcnaughton aremotesensingandgisanalysisofrockfalldistributionsfromthe5july2019ridgecrestmsubwsub71and24june2020owenslakemsubwsub58earthquakes
AT louisascuderi remotesensingandgisanalysisofrockfalldistributionsfromthe5july2019ridgecrestmsubwsub71and24june2020owenslakemsubwsub58earthquakes
AT evansaonyango remotesensingandgisanalysisofrockfalldistributionsfromthe5july2019ridgecrestmsubwsub71and24june2020owenslakemsubwsub58earthquakes
AT timothynaglemcnaughton remotesensingandgisanalysisofrockfalldistributionsfromthe5july2019ridgecrestmsubwsub71and24june2020owenslakemsubwsub58earthquakes