Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones
Assessing the factors that have an impact on potential evapotranspiration (PET) sensitivity to changes in different climate variables is critical to understanding the possible implications of climatic changes on the catchment water balance. Using a global sensitivity analysis, this study assessed th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/2107/2017/hess-21-2107-2017.pdf |
_version_ | 1818449476973494272 |
---|---|
author | D. Guo S. Westra H. R. Maier |
author_facet | D. Guo S. Westra H. R. Maier |
author_sort | D. Guo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Assessing the factors that have an impact on potential evapotranspiration (PET)
sensitivity to changes in different climate variables is critical to
understanding the possible implications of climatic changes on the catchment
water balance. Using a global sensitivity analysis, this study assessed the
implications of baseline climate conditions on the sensitivity of PET to a
large range of plausible changes in temperature (<i>T</i>), relative humidity (RH), solar radiation (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>) and wind speed (<i>u</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>). The analysis was conducted at 30 Australian locations representing different climatic zones, using the Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor PET models. Results from both
models suggest that the baseline climate can have a substantial impact on
overall PET sensitivity. In particular, approximately 2-fold greater
changes in PET were observed in cool-climate energy-limited locations
compared to other locations in Australia, indicating the potential for
elevated water loss as a result of increasing actual evapotranspiration (AET)
in these locations. The two PET models consistently indicated
temperature to be the most important variable for PET, but showed large
differences in the relative importance of the remaining climate variables.
In particular for the Penman–Monteith model, wind and relative humidity were the second-most important variables for dry and humid catchments,
respectively, whereas for the Priestley–Taylor model solar radiation was the second-most important variable, with the greatest influence in warmer
catchments. This information can be useful to inform the selection of
suitable PET models to estimate future PET for different climate conditions,
providing evidence on both the structural plausibility and input uncertainty
for the alternative models. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T20:36:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-017b3363ce034f36b9559595b32d8cab |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T20:36:01Z |
publishDate | 2017-04-01 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-017b3363ce034f36b9559595b32d8cab2022-12-21T22:48:23ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382017-04-012142107212610.5194/hess-21-2107-2017Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zonesD. Guo0S. Westra1H. R. Maier2School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, AustraliaSchool of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, AustraliaSchool of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, AustraliaAssessing the factors that have an impact on potential evapotranspiration (PET) sensitivity to changes in different climate variables is critical to understanding the possible implications of climatic changes on the catchment water balance. Using a global sensitivity analysis, this study assessed the implications of baseline climate conditions on the sensitivity of PET to a large range of plausible changes in temperature (<i>T</i>), relative humidity (RH), solar radiation (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>) and wind speed (<i>u</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>). The analysis was conducted at 30 Australian locations representing different climatic zones, using the Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor PET models. Results from both models suggest that the baseline climate can have a substantial impact on overall PET sensitivity. In particular, approximately 2-fold greater changes in PET were observed in cool-climate energy-limited locations compared to other locations in Australia, indicating the potential for elevated water loss as a result of increasing actual evapotranspiration (AET) in these locations. The two PET models consistently indicated temperature to be the most important variable for PET, but showed large differences in the relative importance of the remaining climate variables. In particular for the Penman–Monteith model, wind and relative humidity were the second-most important variables for dry and humid catchments, respectively, whereas for the Priestley–Taylor model solar radiation was the second-most important variable, with the greatest influence in warmer catchments. This information can be useful to inform the selection of suitable PET models to estimate future PET for different climate conditions, providing evidence on both the structural plausibility and input uncertainty for the alternative models.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/2107/2017/hess-21-2107-2017.pdf |
spellingShingle | D. Guo S. Westra H. R. Maier Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
title | Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones |
title_full | Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones |
title_short | Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones |
title_sort | sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different australian climatic zones |
url | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/2107/2017/hess-21-2107-2017.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dguo sensitivityofpotentialevapotranspirationtochangesinclimatevariablesfordifferentaustralianclimaticzones AT swestra sensitivityofpotentialevapotranspirationtochangesinclimatevariablesfordifferentaustralianclimaticzones AT hrmaier sensitivityofpotentialevapotranspirationtochangesinclimatevariablesfordifferentaustralianclimaticzones |