Parfit D. We Are Not Human Beings / trans. from Engl. U. V. Dobronravova
The article presents a comparative analysis the views on the problem of personality identity by Neo-Lockeanism (Shoemaker, Parfit, Lewis) and Animalism (Olson, Snowden, Carter). A certain of main objections to the psychological criterion (the problem of too many thinkers, the too many persons pro...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/82-95%20%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%82%20%D0%94..pdf |
| Summary: | The article presents a comparative analysis the views on the problem of personality
identity by Neo-Lockeanism (Shoemaker, Parfit, Lewis) and Animalism (Olson,
Snowden, Carter). A certain of main objections to the psychological criterion (the
problem of too many thinkers, the too many persons problem, the thinking parts
problem, etc.) are critically examined. Basic animalist intuitions are refuted by the
embodied person view (McMahan) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |