“Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine
Background: The corona pandemic is changing the framework conditions for medical studies and continuing education as well as the work with patients and within teams. Systematic reflection and communication about experiences and ways of dealing with them forms the basis for successful learning in and...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | GMS Journal for Medical Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2020-37/zma001388.shtml |
| _version_ | 1818389558565273600 |
|---|---|
| author | Klement, Andreas Ibs, Torben Longard, Sebastian Klinkhart, Catarina Frese, Thomas Heise, Marcus |
| author_facet | Klement, Andreas Ibs, Torben Longard, Sebastian Klinkhart, Catarina Frese, Thomas Heise, Marcus |
| author_sort | Klement, Andreas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The corona pandemic is changing the framework conditions for medical studies and continuing education as well as the work with patients and within teams. Systematic reflection and communication about experiences and ways of dealing with them forms the basis for successful learning in and out of the crisis. Therefore, we designed a 90-minute workshop “Corona-Debriefing” for students and physicians in specialist-training in family medicine (ÄiW) using three successive moderated interaction phases: Questionnaire survey via tele-dialogue voting (TED) with immediate presentation of results and discussion, moderated experience reports on the categories risk/assessment/support/coping and finally moderated group discussions in small groups to collect “best practice” examples of crisis management. Objective: We tested “Corona-Debriefing” as a pilot test with 48 participants (TN) in July 2020 (30 present, 14 online) in order to assess mental stress and risk perception of participants plus formative/brief summative evaluation of the workshop. Methods: The PHQ-4 with its subscales GAD-2 (anxiety) and PHQ-2 (depression) was used to assess mental stress; risk assessments were made by means of self-constructed 5-point Likert-scales for the dimensions person/society/health/economy. A formative evaluation was carried out by means of a questionnaire at the end of the event; the brief summative assessment was asked for by means of a school grading scale. Results: 37 complete TED questionnaires and 22 evaluations were obtained. TN showed a low personal risk assessment, but considerable fears about social and economic developments. Needs are seen mainly in improvements regarding organization, protective equipment and technical communication (e.g. official recommendations for action). The workshop was rated “good” or “very good” in 95% of the evaluations. Criticism was directed at the limited time available, the narrowing of topics by moderators and the desire for (even) more room for the exchange of personal experiences.Conclusion: The workshop “Corona-Debriefing” is a relatively easy way to use crisis experiences for learning processes. “Corona-Debriefing” can be used by changing the focus of moderation in various courses, years or fields of study, whereby the participants‘ own personal and clinical crisis experiences remain a prerequisite for a meaningful “debriefing”. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T04:43:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-01addc4c6bc541eb88c84cf5f3076341 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-5017 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T04:43:39Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | GMS Journal for Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-01addc4c6bc541eb88c84cf5f30763412022-12-21T23:16:44ZdeuGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS Journal for Medical Education2366-50172020-12-01377Doc9510.3205/zma001388“Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicineKlement, Andreas0Ibs, Torben1Longard, Sebastian2Klinkhart, Catarina3Frese, Thomas4Heise, Marcus5Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, KOMPAS: Kompetenzzentrum für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle/Saale, GermanyUniversität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, KOMPAS: Kompetenzzentrum für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle/Saale, GermanyUniversität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, KOMPAS: Kompetenzzentrum für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle/Saale, GermanyUniversität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, KOMPAS: Kompetenzzentrum für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle/Saale, GermanyUniversität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, KOMPAS: Kompetenzzentrum für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle/Saale, GermanyUniversität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, KOMPAS: Kompetenzzentrum für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle/Saale, GermanyBackground: The corona pandemic is changing the framework conditions for medical studies and continuing education as well as the work with patients and within teams. Systematic reflection and communication about experiences and ways of dealing with them forms the basis for successful learning in and out of the crisis. Therefore, we designed a 90-minute workshop “Corona-Debriefing” for students and physicians in specialist-training in family medicine (ÄiW) using three successive moderated interaction phases: Questionnaire survey via tele-dialogue voting (TED) with immediate presentation of results and discussion, moderated experience reports on the categories risk/assessment/support/coping and finally moderated group discussions in small groups to collect “best practice” examples of crisis management. Objective: We tested “Corona-Debriefing” as a pilot test with 48 participants (TN) in July 2020 (30 present, 14 online) in order to assess mental stress and risk perception of participants plus formative/brief summative evaluation of the workshop. Methods: The PHQ-4 with its subscales GAD-2 (anxiety) and PHQ-2 (depression) was used to assess mental stress; risk assessments were made by means of self-constructed 5-point Likert-scales for the dimensions person/society/health/economy. A formative evaluation was carried out by means of a questionnaire at the end of the event; the brief summative assessment was asked for by means of a school grading scale. Results: 37 complete TED questionnaires and 22 evaluations were obtained. TN showed a low personal risk assessment, but considerable fears about social and economic developments. Needs are seen mainly in improvements regarding organization, protective equipment and technical communication (e.g. official recommendations for action). The workshop was rated “good” or “very good” in 95% of the evaluations. Criticism was directed at the limited time available, the narrowing of topics by moderators and the desire for (even) more room for the exchange of personal experiences.Conclusion: The workshop “Corona-Debriefing” is a relatively easy way to use crisis experiences for learning processes. “Corona-Debriefing” can be used by changing the focus of moderation in various courses, years or fields of study, whereby the participants‘ own personal and clinical crisis experiences remain a prerequisite for a meaningful “debriefing”.http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2020-37/zma001388.shtmlcoronadebriefingworkshopfamily medicinepilottesting |
| spellingShingle | Klement, Andreas Ibs, Torben Longard, Sebastian Klinkhart, Catarina Frese, Thomas Heise, Marcus “Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine GMS Journal for Medical Education corona debriefing workshop family medicine pilottesting |
| title | “Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine |
| title_full | “Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine |
| title_fullStr | “Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine |
| title_full_unstemmed | “Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine |
| title_short | “Corona-Debriefing”: concept and pilot testing of a 90-minute workshop for undergraduate-education and specialist-training in family medicine |
| title_sort | corona debriefing concept and pilot testing of a 90 minute workshop for undergraduate education and specialist training in family medicine |
| topic | corona debriefing workshop family medicine pilottesting |
| url | http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2020-37/zma001388.shtml |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT klementandreas coronadebriefingconceptandpilottestingofa90minuteworkshopforundergraduateeducationandspecialisttraininginfamilymedicine AT ibstorben coronadebriefingconceptandpilottestingofa90minuteworkshopforundergraduateeducationandspecialisttraininginfamilymedicine AT longardsebastian coronadebriefingconceptandpilottestingofa90minuteworkshopforundergraduateeducationandspecialisttraininginfamilymedicine AT klinkhartcatarina coronadebriefingconceptandpilottestingofa90minuteworkshopforundergraduateeducationandspecialisttraininginfamilymedicine AT fresethomas coronadebriefingconceptandpilottestingofa90minuteworkshopforundergraduateeducationandspecialisttraininginfamilymedicine AT heisemarcus coronadebriefingconceptandpilottestingofa90minuteworkshopforundergraduateeducationandspecialisttraininginfamilymedicine |