Artifacts and levels of abstraction

The purpose of this article is to show how the comparison or analogy with artifacts (i.e., systems engineered by humans) is foundational for the idea that complex neuro-cognitive systems are amenable to explanation at distinct levels, which is a central simplifying strategy for modeling the brain. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Chirimuuta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.952992/full
_version_ 1811310025830825984
author M. Chirimuuta
author_facet M. Chirimuuta
author_sort M. Chirimuuta
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this article is to show how the comparison or analogy with artifacts (i.e., systems engineered by humans) is foundational for the idea that complex neuro-cognitive systems are amenable to explanation at distinct levels, which is a central simplifying strategy for modeling the brain. The most salient source of analogy is of course the digital computer, but I will discuss how some more general comparisons with the processes of design and engineering also play a significant role. I will show how the analogies, and the subsequent notion of a distinct computational level, have engendered common ideas about how safely to abstract away from the complexity of concrete neural systems, yielding explanations of how neural processes give rise to cognitive functions. I also raise worries about the limitations of these explanations, due to neglected differences between the human-made devices and biological organs.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:52:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-01b6a60091b84bb596b8b96e7647f4ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-701X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:52:29Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-01b6a60091b84bb596b8b96e7647f4ff2022-12-22T02:51:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2022-08-011010.3389/fevo.2022.952992952992Artifacts and levels of abstractionM. ChirimuutaThe purpose of this article is to show how the comparison or analogy with artifacts (i.e., systems engineered by humans) is foundational for the idea that complex neuro-cognitive systems are amenable to explanation at distinct levels, which is a central simplifying strategy for modeling the brain. The most salient source of analogy is of course the digital computer, but I will discuss how some more general comparisons with the processes of design and engineering also play a significant role. I will show how the analogies, and the subsequent notion of a distinct computational level, have engendered common ideas about how safely to abstract away from the complexity of concrete neural systems, yielding explanations of how neural processes give rise to cognitive functions. I also raise worries about the limitations of these explanations, due to neglected differences between the human-made devices and biological organs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.952992/fullphilosophy of neurosciencelevels of abstractionlevels of explanationanalogyphilosophy of cognitive science
spellingShingle M. Chirimuuta
Artifacts and levels of abstraction
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
philosophy of neuroscience
levels of abstraction
levels of explanation
analogy
philosophy of cognitive science
title Artifacts and levels of abstraction
title_full Artifacts and levels of abstraction
title_fullStr Artifacts and levels of abstraction
title_full_unstemmed Artifacts and levels of abstraction
title_short Artifacts and levels of abstraction
title_sort artifacts and levels of abstraction
topic philosophy of neuroscience
levels of abstraction
levels of explanation
analogy
philosophy of cognitive science
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.952992/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mchirimuuta artifactsandlevelsofabstraction