Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea

Objective: To compare sleep-related outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients following base of tongue resection via robotic surgery and endoscopic midline glossectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 114 robotic and 37 endoscopic midline glossectomy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Folk, Mark D'Agostino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-06-01
Series:World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881117300537
_version_ 1811319685418844160
author David Folk
Mark D'Agostino
author_facet David Folk
Mark D'Agostino
author_sort David Folk
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare sleep-related outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients following base of tongue resection via robotic surgery and endoscopic midline glossectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 114 robotic and 37 endoscopic midline glossectomy surgeries were performed between July 2010 and April 2015 as part of single or multilevel surgery. Patients were excluded for indications other than sleep apnea or if complete sleep studies were not obtained. Thus, 45 robotic and 16 endoscopic surgeries were included in the analysis. Results: In the robotic surgery group there were statistically significant improvements in AHI [(44.4 ± 22.6) events/hâ(14.0 ± 3.0) events/h, P < 0.001] Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.3 ± 4.6 to 4.5 ± 2.9, P < 0.001), and O2 nadir (82.0% ± 6.1% to 85.0% ± 5.4%, P < 0.001). In the endoscopic group there were also improvements in AHI (48.7 ± 30.2 to 27.4 ± 31.9, P = 0.06), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.6 ± 5.5 to 8.3 ± 4.5, P = 0.08), and O2 nadir (80.2% ± 8.6% to 82.7% ± 6.5%, P = 0.4). Surgical success rate was 75.6% and 56.3% in the robotic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Greater volume of tissue removed was predictive of surgical success in the robotic cases (10.3 vs. 8.6 ml, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Both robotic surgery and endoscopic techniques for tongue base reduction improve objective measures of sleep apnea. Greater success rates may be achieved with robotic surgery compared to traditional methods. Keywords: Sleep surgery, Transoral robotic surgery, TORS, Midline glossectomy, Partial glossectomy, Posterior glossectomy
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:47:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-01ebf4e867b14a6c8c8caa82e8819dd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-8811
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:47:01Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj.art-01ebf4e867b14a6c8c8caa82e8819dd62022-12-22T02:46:20ZengWileyWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2095-88112017-06-0132101105Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apneaDavid Folk0Mark D'Agostino1Yale University, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA; Corresponding author. 800 Howard Avenue 4th Floor, Yale Physicians Building, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.Yale University, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA; Middlesex Hospital, Middletown, CT, USAObjective: To compare sleep-related outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients following base of tongue resection via robotic surgery and endoscopic midline glossectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 114 robotic and 37 endoscopic midline glossectomy surgeries were performed between July 2010 and April 2015 as part of single or multilevel surgery. Patients were excluded for indications other than sleep apnea or if complete sleep studies were not obtained. Thus, 45 robotic and 16 endoscopic surgeries were included in the analysis. Results: In the robotic surgery group there were statistically significant improvements in AHI [(44.4 ± 22.6) events/hâ(14.0 ± 3.0) events/h, P < 0.001] Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.3 ± 4.6 to 4.5 ± 2.9, P < 0.001), and O2 nadir (82.0% ± 6.1% to 85.0% ± 5.4%, P < 0.001). In the endoscopic group there were also improvements in AHI (48.7 ± 30.2 to 27.4 ± 31.9, P = 0.06), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.6 ± 5.5 to 8.3 ± 4.5, P = 0.08), and O2 nadir (80.2% ± 8.6% to 82.7% ± 6.5%, P = 0.4). Surgical success rate was 75.6% and 56.3% in the robotic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Greater volume of tissue removed was predictive of surgical success in the robotic cases (10.3 vs. 8.6 ml, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Both robotic surgery and endoscopic techniques for tongue base reduction improve objective measures of sleep apnea. Greater success rates may be achieved with robotic surgery compared to traditional methods. Keywords: Sleep surgery, Transoral robotic surgery, TORS, Midline glossectomy, Partial glossectomy, Posterior glossectomyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881117300537
spellingShingle David Folk
Mark D'Agostino
Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
title Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
title_full Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
title_fullStr Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
title_full_unstemmed Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
title_short Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
title_sort transoral robotic surgery vs endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881117300537
work_keys_str_mv AT davidfolk transoralroboticsurgeryvsendoscopicpartialmidlineglossectomyforobstructivesleepapnea
AT markdagostino transoralroboticsurgeryvsendoscopicpartialmidlineglossectomyforobstructivesleepapnea