The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.

Bilingual adaptations remain a subject of ongoing debate, with varying results reported across cognitive domains. A possible way to disentangle the apparent inconsistency of results is to focus on the domain of language processing, which is what the bilingual experience boils down to. This study del...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camilla Masullo, Alba Casado, Evelina Leivada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298648&type=printable
_version_ 1797279579495202816
author Camilla Masullo
Alba Casado
Evelina Leivada
author_facet Camilla Masullo
Alba Casado
Evelina Leivada
author_sort Camilla Masullo
collection DOAJ
description Bilingual adaptations remain a subject of ongoing debate, with varying results reported across cognitive domains. A possible way to disentangle the apparent inconsistency of results is to focus on the domain of language processing, which is what the bilingual experience boils down to. This study delves into the role of the bilingual experience on the processing of agreement mismatches. Given the underrepresentation of minority bilingual speakers of non-standard varieties, we advance a unique comparative perspective that includes monolinguals, standard language bilinguals, and different groups of minority language bilinguals, taking advantage of the rich linguistic diversity of the Italian peninsula. This comparative approach can reveal the impact of various sociolinguistic aspects of the bilingual experience across different bilingual trajectories. We developed an auditory acceptability judgement task in Italian, featuring Subject-Verb agreement mismatches. Participants evaluated the stimuli on a 5-point Likert scale and reaction times were recorded. The results do not reveal significant differences between the speakers of standard languages: Italian monolinguals and Italian-Spanish bilinguals. Instead, significant differences are found between monolinguals and the two groups of minority language bidialectals, as well as between the bidialectal groups themselves: Italian-Pavese bidialectals were faster than both Italian-Agrigentino bidialectals and Italian monolinguals, while Italian-Agrigentino bidialectals were less accurate than both Italian-Pavese bidialectals and Italian monolinguals. This intricate picture is explained through variables associated with second language use and language switching. Our findings suggest that if bilingualism is viewed as a yes/no phenotype, it is unavoidable that the bilingual experience will remain a mystery linked to intensely debated results. If, however, one accepts that bilingual adaptations are shaped by the environmental ecology of each trajectory, variation across bilingual processing outcomes is unsurprising. Overall, we argue that specific sociolinguistic factors behind each bilingual experience can reveal where bilingual adaptations on language and cognition stem from.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:28:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-01eddd2f7a8546a5abd207dcf6e5382c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T16:28:10Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-01eddd2f7a8546a5abd207dcf6e5382c2024-03-03T12:55:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01192e029864810.1371/journal.pone.0298648The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.Camilla MasulloAlba CasadoEvelina LeivadaBilingual adaptations remain a subject of ongoing debate, with varying results reported across cognitive domains. A possible way to disentangle the apparent inconsistency of results is to focus on the domain of language processing, which is what the bilingual experience boils down to. This study delves into the role of the bilingual experience on the processing of agreement mismatches. Given the underrepresentation of minority bilingual speakers of non-standard varieties, we advance a unique comparative perspective that includes monolinguals, standard language bilinguals, and different groups of minority language bilinguals, taking advantage of the rich linguistic diversity of the Italian peninsula. This comparative approach can reveal the impact of various sociolinguistic aspects of the bilingual experience across different bilingual trajectories. We developed an auditory acceptability judgement task in Italian, featuring Subject-Verb agreement mismatches. Participants evaluated the stimuli on a 5-point Likert scale and reaction times were recorded. The results do not reveal significant differences between the speakers of standard languages: Italian monolinguals and Italian-Spanish bilinguals. Instead, significant differences are found between monolinguals and the two groups of minority language bidialectals, as well as between the bidialectal groups themselves: Italian-Pavese bidialectals were faster than both Italian-Agrigentino bidialectals and Italian monolinguals, while Italian-Agrigentino bidialectals were less accurate than both Italian-Pavese bidialectals and Italian monolinguals. This intricate picture is explained through variables associated with second language use and language switching. Our findings suggest that if bilingualism is viewed as a yes/no phenotype, it is unavoidable that the bilingual experience will remain a mystery linked to intensely debated results. If, however, one accepts that bilingual adaptations are shaped by the environmental ecology of each trajectory, variation across bilingual processing outcomes is unsurprising. Overall, we argue that specific sociolinguistic factors behind each bilingual experience can reveal where bilingual adaptations on language and cognition stem from.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298648&type=printable
spellingShingle Camilla Masullo
Alba Casado
Evelina Leivada
The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.
PLoS ONE
title The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.
title_full The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.
title_fullStr The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.
title_full_unstemmed The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.
title_short The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.
title_sort role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors evidence from italian varieties
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298648&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT camillamasullo theroleofminoritylanguagebilingualisminspottingagreementattractionerrorsevidencefromitalianvarieties
AT albacasado theroleofminoritylanguagebilingualisminspottingagreementattractionerrorsevidencefromitalianvarieties
AT evelinaleivada theroleofminoritylanguagebilingualisminspottingagreementattractionerrorsevidencefromitalianvarieties
AT camillamasullo roleofminoritylanguagebilingualisminspottingagreementattractionerrorsevidencefromitalianvarieties
AT albacasado roleofminoritylanguagebilingualisminspottingagreementattractionerrorsevidencefromitalianvarieties
AT evelinaleivada roleofminoritylanguagebilingualisminspottingagreementattractionerrorsevidencefromitalianvarieties