Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
The results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren of primary and senior levels of education are presented. In order to identify differences in the levels of formation of individual characteristics of thinking linked, inter alia, with the chara...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Научный диалог |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/783 |
_version_ | 1797245873762074624 |
---|---|
author | V. N. Alekseyev T. S. Mamontova M. V. Shustova E. V. Chepurnenko |
author_facet | V. N. Alekseyev T. S. Mamontova M. V. Shustova E. V. Chepurnenko |
author_sort | V. N. Alekseyev |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren of primary and senior levels of education are presented. In order to identify differences in the levels of formation of individual characteristics of thinking linked, inter alia, with the characteristics of social, physical and physiological development of students in urban and rural schools, a number of works were studied on the comparison of functional indicators of hemodynamics, psycho-emotional stability, verbal and logical thinking and characteristics of educational and cognitive activity among urban and rural schoolchildren. The results of the interpretation of the data obtained during the experiment conducted by the authors (54 respondents, 27 rural and urban high school students) are presented. It is concluded that rural pupils are characterized by higher level of development of abilities and qualities of the personality, providing them successful performance of the main types of mathematical activity: low level of psychoemotional tension, qualitative analysis of visual and visually-spatial information, logical conclusions, generalization of information, interest in the correct solution of a problem, etc. In the future, it is expected to find out possible reasons for “lagging” of urban schoolchildren from rural ones in terms of individual indicators of formation of mathematical thinking operations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:31:38Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-01f0aebd48274cd19c6d22ef02a7edb7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2225-756X 2227-1295 |
language | Russian |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T19:33:50Z |
publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
publisher | Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov |
record_format | Article |
series | Научный диалог |
spelling | doaj.art-01f0aebd48274cd19c6d22ef02a7edb72024-03-25T14:30:55ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952018-04-010428029110.24224/2227-1295-2018-4-280-291779Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural SchoolchildrenV. N. Alekseyev0T. S. Mamontova1M. V. Shustova2E. V. Chepurnenko3Ishim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityIshim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityIshim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityIshim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityThe results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren of primary and senior levels of education are presented. In order to identify differences in the levels of formation of individual characteristics of thinking linked, inter alia, with the characteristics of social, physical and physiological development of students in urban and rural schools, a number of works were studied on the comparison of functional indicators of hemodynamics, psycho-emotional stability, verbal and logical thinking and characteristics of educational and cognitive activity among urban and rural schoolchildren. The results of the interpretation of the data obtained during the experiment conducted by the authors (54 respondents, 27 rural and urban high school students) are presented. It is concluded that rural pupils are characterized by higher level of development of abilities and qualities of the personality, providing them successful performance of the main types of mathematical activity: low level of psychoemotional tension, qualitative analysis of visual and visually-spatial information, logical conclusions, generalization of information, interest in the correct solution of a problem, etc. In the future, it is expected to find out possible reasons for “lagging” of urban schoolchildren from rural ones in terms of individual indicators of formation of mathematical thinking operations.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/783rural schoolchildrenurban schoolchildrencomparative analysis of peculiarities of thinkingmathematical activity |
spellingShingle | V. N. Alekseyev T. S. Mamontova M. V. Shustova E. V. Chepurnenko Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren Научный диалог rural schoolchildren urban schoolchildren comparative analysis of peculiarities of thinking mathematical activity |
title | Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren |
title_sort | comparative analysis of peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren |
topic | rural schoolchildren urban schoolchildren comparative analysis of peculiarities of thinking mathematical activity |
url | https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vnalekseyev comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren AT tsmamontova comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren AT mvshustova comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren AT evchepurnenko comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren |