Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren

The results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren of primary and senior levels of education are presented. In order to identify differences in the levels of formation of individual characteristics of thinking linked, inter alia, with the chara...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. N. Alekseyev, T. S. Mamontova, M. V. Shustova, E. V. Chepurnenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018-04-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/783
_version_ 1797245873762074624
author V. N. Alekseyev
T. S. Mamontova
M. V. Shustova
E. V. Chepurnenko
author_facet V. N. Alekseyev
T. S. Mamontova
M. V. Shustova
E. V. Chepurnenko
author_sort V. N. Alekseyev
collection DOAJ
description The results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren of primary and senior levels of education are presented. In order to identify differences in the levels of formation of individual characteristics of thinking linked, inter alia, with the characteristics of social, physical and physiological development of students in urban and rural schools, a number of works were studied on the comparison of functional indicators of hemodynamics, psycho-emotional stability, verbal and logical thinking and characteristics of educational and cognitive activity among urban and rural schoolchildren. The results of the interpretation of the data obtained during the experiment conducted by the authors (54 respondents, 27 rural and urban high school students) are presented. It is concluded that rural pupils are characterized by higher level of development of abilities and qualities of the personality, providing them successful performance of the main types of mathematical activity: low level of psychoemotional tension, qualitative analysis of visual and visually-spatial information, logical conclusions, generalization of information, interest in the correct solution of a problem, etc. In the future, it is expected to find out possible reasons for “lagging” of urban schoolchildren from rural ones in terms of individual indicators of formation of mathematical thinking operations.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:31:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-01f0aebd48274cd19c6d22ef02a7edb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:33:50Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj.art-01f0aebd48274cd19c6d22ef02a7edb72024-03-25T14:30:55ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952018-04-010428029110.24224/2227-1295-2018-4-280-291779Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural SchoolchildrenV. N. Alekseyev0T. S. Mamontova1M. V. Shustova2E. V. Chepurnenko3Ishim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityIshim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityIshim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityIshim Pedagogical Institute named after P. P. Ershov, Branch of Tyumen State UniversityThe results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren of primary and senior levels of education are presented. In order to identify differences in the levels of formation of individual characteristics of thinking linked, inter alia, with the characteristics of social, physical and physiological development of students in urban and rural schools, a number of works were studied on the comparison of functional indicators of hemodynamics, psycho-emotional stability, verbal and logical thinking and characteristics of educational and cognitive activity among urban and rural schoolchildren. The results of the interpretation of the data obtained during the experiment conducted by the authors (54 respondents, 27 rural and urban high school students) are presented. It is concluded that rural pupils are characterized by higher level of development of abilities and qualities of the personality, providing them successful performance of the main types of mathematical activity: low level of psychoemotional tension, qualitative analysis of visual and visually-spatial information, logical conclusions, generalization of information, interest in the correct solution of a problem, etc. In the future, it is expected to find out possible reasons for “lagging” of urban schoolchildren from rural ones in terms of individual indicators of formation of mathematical thinking operations.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/783rural schoolchildrenurban schoolchildrencomparative analysis of peculiarities of thinkingmathematical activity
spellingShingle V. N. Alekseyev
T. S. Mamontova
M. V. Shustova
E. V. Chepurnenko
Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
Научный диалог
rural schoolchildren
urban schoolchildren
comparative analysis of peculiarities of thinking
mathematical activity
title Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
title_full Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
title_short Comparative Analysis of Peculiarities of Thinking of Urban and Rural Schoolchildren
title_sort comparative analysis of peculiarities of thinking of urban and rural schoolchildren
topic rural schoolchildren
urban schoolchildren
comparative analysis of peculiarities of thinking
mathematical activity
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/783
work_keys_str_mv AT vnalekseyev comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren
AT tsmamontova comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren
AT mvshustova comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren
AT evchepurnenko comparativeanalysisofpeculiaritiesofthinkingofurbanandruralschoolchildren